gamb00ler

https://voice.google.com/u/0/rates

Koch's work was very good in the 1880's. Do you only have very old material to learn from? I assume you use gas and oil lamps the same as Koch used since electrification was extremely rare those days. I like the kerosene lamps myself because they amazed me when I was under 10. Here's a recent publication that identifies the flaws in that 19th century effort by Koch. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/kochs-postulates Enjoy, read and join the modern era!

I use Google Voice (GV). There is a mobile phone app and you can use on your computer as well via a webpage. The call recipient can be on any landline or mobile with no app. I don't call any country other than USA and Canada which are free to call using GV. Many years ago I did use GV rarely to call Thailand from US and the rates were reasonable but the connection was mediocre. Lately my connections to USA from Thailand have been near perfect so the connections have probably improved. I think you may need the assistance of someone in the USA to help you set it up initially. I did that myself before I moved here 5 years ago. GV requires an actual US based phone number to get started. If you need more help, just ask on AN. There are many GV users here.

Yeah... sign me up.... I'll write a chat bot to fill your misinformation group with real information. Sorta like your role here only faster!

See above. All in English and layman's terminology. Easy peasy..... can you not read?

Even your all time hero, Koch abandoned one of his postulates (assumptions). Here's a breakdown of the refutations and limitations of the 140 year old Koch postulates: 1. Viruses and Prions: Viruses: Koch's postulates were originally designed for bacteria and other culturable microorganisms. Viruses, being obligate intracellular parasites, cannot be grown in pure culture outside a host cell, making it impossible to fulfill postulates 2 and 3. Prions: These infectious proteins cannot be grown in culture and also don't elicit an immune response, making them impossible to identify using Koch's postulates. 2. Asymptomatic Carriers: Koch abandoned the first postulate when he discovered asymptomatic carriers of cholera, where an individual carries the pathogen without showing symptoms. Modern understanding of diseases recognizes that many pathogens can be carried without causing illness, making it difficult to definitively link a microbe to a disease solely based on its presence in all affected individuals. 3. Difficulty Culturing Pathogens: Some pathogens are difficult or impossible to grow in the lab, even with modern techniques, preventing the fulfillment of postulate 2 (isolation and culture). Examples include viruses, some bacteria, and certain fungi. 4. Polymicrobial Infections: Koch's postulates tend to focus on a single pathogen causing a disease, but many diseases are actually caused by a combination of different microorganisms. This polymicrobial nature makes it challenging to isolate and test the role of each individual microbe in the disease process. 5. Genetic and Host Factors: Individuals can have different susceptibilities to the same pathogen due to genetic factors or other underlying health conditions, meaning the pathogen may not always cause the disease in every individual. This variability makes it difficult to apply the postulates universally. 6. Molecular Koch's Postulates and Alternatives: Modern approaches, like molecular Koch's postulates, focus on identifying specific genes in a pathogen that are responsible for causing disease. Techniques like PCR and DNA sequencing have also been developed to identify pathogens, even those that are difficult to culture, and to establish links between pathogens and diseases. Other criteria, such as the Bradford Hill criteria, are also used to establish causality in infectious diseases.

I would think that you know the very simple rules of logic that pertain to your statement. It is nigh impossible to logically prove that a negative statement such as yours is correct. Since it is an obvious violation of pure logic it MUST be discarded. On what basis do you say that your post is true? Have you seen ALL evidence? I don't think so. Since you definitely haven't seen ALL evidence, your statement is just more of the usual boastful ignorance for which you've become infamous.

That's fast processing. Schwab and Capital One take several days for the transaction to hit my account.

Today is a good day to do a cash advance at Krungsri bank on a US debit card with no foreign transaction fee. You can get up to 150,000 ฿ each time. No fee using MasterCard, but 200 ฿ for VISA. VISA rate is 32.44 will remain at that setting until 7AM tomorrow Thai time. WISE rate is 32.24 if sending 30K US$ smaller amounts get a worse rate and higher amounts get slightly better

Since @spidermike007 has replied with silence... I'll adopt the anti-vaxers approach and make up an answer. My guess is that he was trained by Professor Plum in the library with a candlestick. The humor/humour will be lost on anyone without a Clue (game).

The flip side is the not the one that people actually want to buy

Wackos spreading harmful nonsense aren't called messengers. Rightfully they should be dissuaded until they grow weary and stop.

I agree... when BLMFem posted it... it was very appropriate.

The real info about MSG. https://www.health.harvard.edu/nutrition/monosodium-glutamate-msg-what-it-is-and-why-you-might-consider-avoiding-foods-that-contain-it

I notice that now WISE gives a discount for larger transfers. For 60K US$ their net rate(after fees) is 32.78, for 30K US$ it is 32.766, for 10K US$ you get 32.759.... not much of a discount. Those rates assume you are transferring funds that are already in your WISE account. Rates will be worse for any other method of funding the transfer.

Here's a reminder of the many inventions that are younger than the very aged Koch Postulates. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_United_States_inventions_(1890–1945)#:~:text=1890 Tabulating machine,data processing had been born. Time to modernize your thinking!

why not just learn how to use search efficiently rather than waiting for a response from AN? Learn once and use for the rest of your life. Don't be so lazy. I see... Yandex... a Russian search engine. Comrade, now I see things a lot more clearly.

They were a decent attempt but modern science soon turned them into Swiss cheese. Check you calendar.... it's 2025 not 1890. The discovery of the first virus came after Koch formulated his postulates. He's not at fault for that... but you are for blindly following ancient thinking. Koch's postulates, while foundational in establishing links between microbes and diseases, have limitations that have led to their weakening in the 21st century. These limitations include the inability to culture all pathogens, variations in host susceptibility, and the existence of asymptomatic carriers. Furthermore, some diseases are caused by viruses or prions, which don't fit neatly within the original framework of the postulates. Here's a more detailed look at the weakening of Koch's postulates: Inability to Culture All Pathogens: Koch's postulates assume that all disease-causing agents can be isolated and grown in pure culture. However, many microorganisms, especially viruses and some bacteria, are obligate intracellular parasites, meaning they can only replicate within a host cell. This makes it impossible to fulfill the second postulate, which requires isolation and culture of the pathogen. Examples include HIV, which only infects humans, and Mycobacterium leprae, the causative agent of leprosy, which has limited culturing capabilities.

Are you really going to assert that your knowledge of how to search is that weak? No wonder you're unable to find the truth.... Mulder could... the truth is out there.

I have to admit, you certainly are a good source of information on Wackos. Some very entertaining chumps there. I assume you know what happens to chumps and their money... BBC is great: A German biologist who offered €100,000 (£71,350; $106,300) to anyone who could prove that measles is a virus has been ordered by a court to pay up. Stefan Lanka, who believes the illness is psychosomatic, made the pledge four years ago on his website.

Did you happen to count the number of times the authors used words and phrases like: "remains unknown", "may", "reasonable to assume", "further research will clarify", "mRNA can theoretically" ??

You can save even more by reviewing modern medical science rather than postulates from the late 1800's. By the way, have you ever looked up the definition of 'postulate'? Did you miss the part of the definition that states: suggest or assume the existence, fact, or truth of (something) It doesn't mention testing or verifying anything... only ASSume.

I did find out that when I request a quote using a domestic wire to move the money to WISE, they also showed me the quote for using money already in a WISE account. The option is shown but greyed out.

To get the WISE quote what funding choice do you use? Using funds already in your WISE account always gives the best net result. I don't have enough in my WISE account to get a quote using that as a source.

Since the TH banks haven't yet updated their TT rates since Friday ... and the WISE rate has risen ⅓% since 6AM this morning ... it is not a fair comparison. Oooops... BBL just updated about 15 minutes ago... now paying 32.75/US$ yielding 1,964,500 afer deducting 500 fee but SWIFT fee assumed to be 0