impulse

Making up laws to go after political opponents is hardly a legal technicality.

She was his insurance against getting impeached. Sheer genius. Evil, yes. But genius. Edit: I'd add that she's probably the reason nobody will invoke the 25th, in spite of an obvious and compelling need.

That's not what my company's HR told me. And I can't imagine an American teacher paying tax on 80K. But maybe they are...

How'za 'bout WaPo? 8. Michelle Obama This is the fantasy option for Democrats — and we mean that in more than one way. She would seem to be the ideal alternative for many, but she also seems unlikely to run. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/28/democrat-options-replace-biden/ Have a look at the Fox video referencing the 10 alternatives mentioned in the WaPo article, look at the faces, and tell me who ticks the DEI boxes, other than Kamala and Michelle? https://www.foxnews.com/video/6356008437112

It's even cringy-er. There were stairs. Even I felt bad for the guy. .

Even the Supreme Court is calling out the 2 tier justice system, contorting the laws to punish political opposition. I can hear lefty heads exploding.

By that token, isn't Biden just riding the same wave. (If you neglect the fact that the jobs he's "created" are mostly part time and for the foreign born, which aren't the jobs on which to build the American dream of home ownership)

Dems have a Kamala problem. They can't ditch her without alienating a core constituency. And there's no way she wins the election. They're gonna beg Michelle to run, for the good of the country with Newsom as her VP. She'll step aside after a year or two and Newsom will be able to serve 2-1/2 terms. That's his carrot to run as VP and not top of the ticket. Michelle may hate politics, but she loved living in the White House. (and Barak gets another term, which he'd kill for)

I'm not a Biden fan at all. In fact, just the opposite. But this morning, I felt sorry for him, suffering the elder abuse. With another twinge of sympathy watching Jill lead him off the stage. The presidential debate isn't the only thing that ended today.

She believes the whistleblower has the shipside tracker. Wouldn't it be easy to confirm that, and make a definitive statement? All she has to do is ask the FBI. Instead, she makes a weasel statement that can later give her plausible deniability if it's taken to trial. I believe... The whistleblower was under oath, pretty adamant, and a lot less weaselly. A Boeing whistleblower said there is a “criminal coverup” surrounding January’s Alaska Airlines blowout. “Records do exist documenting in detail the hectic work done on the Alaska Airlines airplane, and Boeing’s corporate leaders know it too,” Pierson said. “I know this Alaska airplane documentation exists because I personally passed it to the FBI.” (links above) So who do you believe, the guy who's definitive, under oath, and testifying under penalty of perjury, or the nice lady who claims to believe, is not under oath and isn't really sure?

Could be he was referring to the 25th Amendment, and not Project 2025.

$29 fine. That'll stop him doing it again.

It's not age. I know 90 somethings that are sharp as a tack, and 60 somethings that have already lost the plot.

Look at the photo in the OP and tell me how many people had to fall down on the job to not notice those bolts were missing. I count the insulation people, the interior trim people and probably the electrical people. All of them had an opportunity to call out the safety escape. Just the folks who covered up the area with the interior panels should have noticed that the bolts were missing. The bolts they've seen the previous 152 times they did the same work. I read the link. I understood it perfectly. And I laughed at the arrogance. If you want a good conspiracy theory, how about the whistleblower who claims that the missing documents do exist, and he handed them over to the FBI. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/boeing-critic-says-he-shared-missing-737-bolt-records-with-fbi/ar-BB1lNVB5

And he was having one of his best days.

Seriously? You'd think that any employee should stop work when they notice missing bolts that they're about to cover up with trim moulding. Like, "The past 152 times I did this work, there were bolts. This time, there aren't any. Maybe I should mention that to the safety guy before I cover it up". Not that I'd expect them to install the bolts themselves. But that they bring it up to the people responsible. Paper or no.

All that Biden did was confirm that Hur was right.

The sad thing is that you can wear a Biden shirt or hat and the Trumpers will leave you alone. Maybe laugh a little. Wear a Trump hat, and the lefties will assault you, call the cops, and try to get you thrown out of wherever you are.

Full analysis... Denying what your lying eyes just saw.

Call me cynical, but is Boeing claiming that the employees who put the interior trim moulding on over the door plug need paperwork to notice that the bolts were missing?

Mumbler in Chief.

You mean they should censor misinformation like "smoking causes cancer"? Because for decades, that was contrary to the (bought and paid for) "science".

Asked and answered: Google maps said they're open (I've been let down by Maps before...) I went up to Mixt Chatuchak and they were open. As a bonus, they were much less crowded without the bleedover from the weekend market. Sad for the vendors. Great for me. Found a nice camera at a decent price, but they didn't have a battery for it so I couldn't test it. Walked away slightly disappointed. They had literally hundreds of other cameras, but I had a specific type and specification in mind (though was open to several brands). Camera store is on the 2nd floor and well worth a visit if you're already at Chatuchak. No new cameras, but gobs of used ones, and accessories.

If you believe that, you obviously didn't read all the pages. You missed the part about doing diddly squat until the numbers go to 5000 a day. Then, they'd think about shutting it down. That's 1.8 million a year, normalized and codified. You also missed the part about HR.2 which passed the Repub controlled House last year, but the Dem controlled senate won't even take it up. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4390204-5-things-to-know-about-border-bill-hr2-gop-shutdown-threats/

Seems like you shouldn't need your entire budget if you're only going after the crimes by the right. Maybe 1/3 would be appropriate, because conservatives voters aren't committing more than 1/3 of the crimes. That's from the FBI stats back when we could trust them. But they didn't fit the narrative, so they changed the way they count crimes. And now we can't even trust the FBI crime stats. Yet another reason to cut the budget, and put that money toward an impartial statistics keeper.