impulse

They know him best... And a bad decision when they see one. Should'a gone with Shapiro. Edit: AP's calling MN Blue. But she still should have gone with Shapiro...

And he was prescient about "the syndrome". "You can't argue with a sick mind."

Speaking of fraud, they tried to do it again... “Early this morning we learned that Republican poll watchers in Philadelphia, York, Westmoreland, Allegheny, Lehigh, Cambria, Wyoming, and Lackawanna Counties were being turned away,” RNC Chair Michael Whatley posted on X. “We deployed our roving attorneys, engaged with local officials, and can now report that all Republican poll watchers have been let into the building,” he wrote. Kudos to the RNC for being ready this time... https://www.westernjournal.com/republican-election-attorneys-score-early-morning-victory-pennsylvania-report/ https://www.rt.com/news/606985-trump-harris-election-live/ (14:23 GMT update)

Careful... That toad'll get you while you're dealing with the snek.

Today's update: Truth Social is a 3 years old tech startup. It’s worth $5.4 billion. If you (a venture capitalist) had done a $1m on $10m post seed round, you would be sitting on $500m+ in gains and a 714% IRR. This is why VCs should NEVER pass on founders based on political views. — John Coogan DJT’s shares skyrocketed over 200% in October, The New York Post reported. https://dailycaller.com/2024/11/04/truth-social-donald-trump-stock-election-day-net-worth/

In 2020, all 5 voted Biden. Now it's tied at 3 each. Not looking good for Team Harris. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/02/politics/dixville-notch-2020-results/index.html

I remember within my voting lifetime when candidates were dropping out of races if they had illegal nannies or other employees in their past. Back then, there were real consequences for hiring illegals. I miss those days...

Musk having probably the most extensive intelligence network beside the FSB, the CIA and Mossad (and maybe the Zuck), I know who I'd bet on in a fact checking contest.

Hey, I'll always choose a lefty link if it makes the case. I could choose a righty link that also discusses FBI involvement and entrapment and the "mysterious" pipe bombers, but those get deleted as "unapproved sources" Lefty links rarely (if ever) get deleted. No matter how phoney (your speeling, not mine).

If you say so. CNN and the Portland police seem to disagree... Anti-Trump protesters march for 3rd night; Portland police call it a ‘riot’ https://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/11/us/oregon-protest-riot/index.html Remind me... How long did Jan6 go on? I think the answer is in the name. Jan6. Not Jan6-xx.

On Jan6? 4 people died. 2 protestors of heart attacks, one protestor from an overdose, and one shot by a cop. The next day, a cop died from multiple strokes. In the next few weeks, some cops died by their own hand... https://www.factcheck.org/2021/11/how-many-died-as-a-result-of-capitol-riot/ Hardly the bloodbath it's been painted as...

They rioted for about a week, and all over the country. Burning and looting against innocent people and their businesses who had absolutely nothing to do with Hillary taking the L. https://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/11/us/oregon-protest-riot/index.html https://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/13/us/protests-elections-trump/index.html https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/09/501513889/anti-trump-protests-break-out-in-cities-across-the-country https://www.cbsnews.com/news/anti-trump-protests-carry-on-for-fourth-straight-day-after-election/ What was Jan6? A couple of hours?

No, when did antifa ever express any interest in the outcome of an election. You're clutching at straws. Gosh. If only there wasn't that week of rioting after Trump won in 2016...

I think you'll find that there are 2 correlations to what part of America... Which are not independent variables. So really, just one. And the color is Blue.

I'd have given the guy $0.60- $1.50 for a place in line rather than risk getting banged up for stabbing him.

Yeah. 'Cause they got all kinds of witnesses to lie under oath...

If you want to hurt Trump, misquote him or take a snippet of what he says, out of context. If you want to hurt Harris, quote her actual words in their full context. She's a gaffing machine. And that's on top of her dangerous ideology.

Please tell me that at least investigated the possibility he had some help getting over the balcony. While I agree that Thai balcony railings are often too low for safety and the odds are he was alone, I'd hope they at least look at any CCTV and talk to witnesses.

If you don't like the source, go to the root document. Here's more for you to not bother reading... So you can claim that "there's no evidence" or "that's been debunked". Like the MSM. But there is evidence, and it hasn't been debunked. It's being squelched. https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/report-how-fbi-prebunked-true-story-about-biden-familys-corruption-advance https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/FBI-Election-Interference-Report-FINAL--10-30-24-.pdf

That's what the MSM said about the Floyd (BLM) riots, when there were cars and buildings burning in the background on the news video. How disingenuous is that? Mostly peaceful arson and looting. That cost innocent people and shop owners $Billions. As stupid as January 6 turned out, there's a rationality to protesting where there's a chance of influencing change. Rioting all over the country was irrational, and evil. Causing misery to people who had nothing to do with their grievance. Of course, they did score some big screen TVs.

They rioted for about a week, and all over the country. Burning and looting against innocent people and their businesses who had absolutely nothing to do with Hillary taking the L. https://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/11/us/oregon-protest-riot/index.html https://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/13/us/protests-elections-trump/index.html https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/09/501513889/anti-trump-protests-break-out-in-cities-across-the-country https://www.cbsnews.com/news/anti-trump-protests-carry-on-for-fourth-straight-day-after-election/

Does Trump masquerade as a news outlet like CNN does?

You'd think that CNN wouldn't have to dig 3+ years in the past to come up with an instance where someone was harmed by the laws that are saving thousands of kid every year.

a) Because this isn't a news report. It's a blatant political message. b) Tragic as this story is, there's been thousands of kids not killed, and living their lives because of the same laws.

I wonder if there's any significance to the fact that this tragedy happened in 2021 and it's just now being "reported" less than a week before the election. And no reports of the thousands of kids that are living happy lives after not being aborted...