Jump to content

Sceptict11

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sceptict11

  1. Normal is up to 30 days early. Bangkok is now saying 45 days.

    Philip from Thaivisarun did my 12 months extension over 90 days before the expiry date last time.

    That is interesting !

    I was always under the impression that extensions had to be applied for in person.

    And "Philip" obtained a new extension a full 9o days in advance ?

    Are you sure where the "extension" came from ?

    As a matter of interest how much does this service cost in excess of 1900Bht ?

  2. GettingOlder

    You will not receive a "retirement" visa in KL.

    The best you can hope for would be a single entry NON "O" visa with which you can apply ( within Thailand) for an extension of stay based on retirement .

    At worst you will be offered a single entry tourist visa which can be converted , again in Thailand to a NON "O" visa and subsequent extension of stay if you meet the financial requirements .

  3. Yes, the fear of ghosts has never made sense to me especially as regards people who were known and loved, but there you have it. The Cambodians and Burmese are the same. Firmly believe in ghosts and petrified of them.

    The belief in the "Pee" (ghost) is reinforced by popular Thai "soap operas"!

  4. The local Government funded Kindergarten is excellent.

    Free for Thai children and nominal fees for others. Structured play, painting , dance and other activities. Gentle "fun" oriented introduction to written Thai and the English language .

    Lunch provided and the day runs from 08:30 to 15:30

    An excellent introduction to "school" and an ideal environment for children to learn to socialise

  5. Sorry about your friends.

    Death is something which different societies/cultures manage in many ways.

    In the "West" death is often sanitised and "hidden away" which why the Thai way may seem strange to an "outsider"

    Grieve for your friends but take your clues on what is acceptable from the Thais.

    • Like 1
  6. Forgot to give this link

    http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/spotcancerearly/screening/breastcancerscreening/breast-cancer-screening

    Note !

    "for every life saved from breast cancer by screening, around three women are overdiagnosed".

    Some of these ladies will undergo mastectomy which is of no benefit and all will suffer some degree of psychological harm.

    Nobody perfroms or undergoes mastectomy based on a mammogram result. Mammograms may lead to unnecessary biopsies (unnecessary in retrospect) but not to unnecessary mastectomies..which in any case are not nowadays the most common treatment for early breast cancer in situ.

    With any screening test there is a trade-off between sensitivity (ability to detect a condition if it is there) and specificity (risk of a false negative). A screening test is just that..a tool for screening, flagging cases for further diagnostic evaluation. Screening tests are not in themselves diagnostic nor are they expected to be.

    And with any screening test there will be both false negatives and false positives. If one wants to minimize the false negatives, i.e. to maximize the chance the screening will flag cases that have the problem, one has to accept an increased number of false positives. If you want to remove the possibility of false positives, you will inevitably increase the numbers of false negatives. It is generally better to err on the side of the former.

    Nonetheless it is very concerning that a quite a significant percentage of both breast cancer and prostate cancer screenings are leading to unecessary interventions.

    It leaves patients in a very difficult situation should they test positive.

    Partial content of an email received from a Dr friend .

    "A review, published last year, shows the effects of three decades of breast cancer screening in the US. During this period, the number of “early-stage” cancers more than doubled, from 112 to 234 per 100,000 women. This should have drastically reduced the number in whom the disease was diagnosed in its “late” stages, were the rationale for screening sound; but this fell by just eight per cent.

    The only possible inference from this discrepancy has to be that many of those with “early stage” cancers, 70,000 every year, do not have the disease. Or, to be specific, that the interpretation of the tissue specimens obtained at biopsy is incorrect, and that they are benign rather than cancerous.
    These women would none the less have undergone treatment, which leads on to the further disturbing revelation highlighted in a recent report in this paper, titled “Genetic tests could spare thousands from chemotherapy”. This confirms what many have suspected: that a substantial proportion of those in whom screening identifies a genuine cancer endure the rigours of chemotherapy to no purpose."
    The same considerations apply to prostate cancer in men, where the massive upswing in the number of cases since the introduction of PSA screening has not been paralleled by a fall in mortality from the disease. It must be presumed that many gain no advantage from treatment. No doubt in time these screening programmes will adapt to take into account the profound uncertainties about their effectiveness, but for the moment, those found to have “early” cancers need to ask searching questions."
  7. I went to see the urologist yesterday and he is abroad a few days so will see after.

    In the meantime here is the information I collected which educated....and rather surprised....me. Bear in mind it is a congeries from various sources so a bit jumbled, and I have inserted most of the UpToDate rundown for added breadth (it's a peer reviewed condensed information source for physicians).

    The sources are all highly reputable.

    The bolding of keypoints is mine:

    An interesting collation of fact!

    The information will be inaccessible to many owing to the academic/scientific jargon used.

    What is clear is that "screening" by PSA is a very blunt tool which leads potentially to over diagnosis and treatment. .

    An elevated PSA places both patient and doctor between a rock and a hard place.

    There are no clear answers to this problem which is similar to the problems associated with female breast screening by mammogram which has resulted in many ladies being over diagnosed and treated for "disease" which would have a very low risk of mortality.

  8. Yep. A 15 day Visa Exempt entry.

    Since he didn't mention his nationality, does this apply to everyone?? ... for example someone from India or Pakistan ??

    Well spotted!

    Believe if he comes from any one of the following countries .............

    Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Brunei, Belgium, Canada, Czech, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, New Zealand, Oman, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Slovak, Slovenia, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, UAE, USA and United Kingdom.

    The 15 day visa exempt entry is available !smile.png

    Have I missed any ?coffee1.gif

  9. "I had it because I was accompanying my girlfriend who was given a 2 year contract, all in all the "visa" lasted 15 months. I then went to Laos and got a single entry tourist visa to tie me over until I came home. Thailand is the sort of country where people couldn't care if you teach on a tourist visa so this is why I am asking what people do if they are a TEFL teacher without a degree, what visa do they get?"

    Interesting why should a NON "O" visa be granted to a "boyfriend" because his "girlfriend" had a two year contract ?

    Am I missing something ?

    If so will one of the experts please enlighten me smile.png

  10. There are Care Homes for the elderly in Bangkok.

    There are also care homes in Pattaya and Phuket.

    I'm elderly already and handicapped. My Thai wife left after I started to need assistance walking. I hired a Thai woman to take care of me. Well two in fact though I had to terminate the first one because she is unreliable. The second hire was a great success. She has been with me for four years now. She organises everything cleaning, cooking, shopping repairs, excursions and manages my medications both purchasing and administration thereof. For injection, vaccinations etc. The nurse from the government clinic, which is in our soi, comes to my house. I pay 200 Baht a minute. These Thai women are a wonder.

    I'm in my own home 24/7 and always someone here with me. Better than a care home and cheaper too. All I have to do is sit at home and pay the bill when the girl gives the to me.

    You really pay 200 Bht a minute ? 12,000 Bht an hour ?

    I hope that was typed in error if not I will come and work for you at a rate of 11,000 Baht an hour smile.png

×
×
  • Create New...