Jump to content

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    15,169
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Eric Loh

  1. 2 hours ago, pornprong said:

    If PTP (and friends) win 251 seats in the lower house then the Senate is irrelevant.

    The Senate only comes into play if no party can muster the 251 votes required to elect a PM.

    SO the answer to your question is no - the Senate will never concede, it exists solely to elevate Prayuth into the Premiership.

    It can all end in the lower house if the alliance works. Prayut’s crooked plan to involve the upper house will not come into play like you indicated. 

     

    This may affect the allegiance of the upper house and the senators even appointed may switch side. Really nothing that will hold down their allegiance if Prayut is rendered just another citizen. Just like all previous coup generals, he will face into oblivion; hopefully stand trial for the damages he has caused the country. 

  2. 2 hours ago, Chang_paarp said:

    Looks like the penny finally dropped that not having election observers might have unwanted consequences.

    I wouldn't pop the champagne yet. They still have to be approved by the EC and they can make the approval a tedious and laborious process. I rather wait and watch for new developments and feet on the ground before agreeing the EC relented.  

    • Like 2
  3. 14 minutes ago, zzaa09 said:

    Yeah.

    If such is case, all elective processes the world over might be suspect and therefore require "International monitoring". 

    Reeks of this make believe superiority complex, emanating from particular civilised Western cultures that view such activity as an empire extension. 

     

    Mind your own and recheck yourself firstly. 

    No one's business - let the Thais get on however they see fit. 

    Ahem, the article was written by a Thai and that person expressed concern about the fairness of the election. Thais are minding their own business and see fit to call out the junta for banning international observers. You should mind your own.

  4. I don't think Thailand can afford to be a welfare state like the Scandinavia countries which are well-known welfare poster boys. Thailand is not economically equal and does not have a large enough middle-class paying income tax demography. It will need a lot of taxpayers and only a few people who permanently need the welfare. The inequality is just too large and disproportionate of small pool of tax payers versus a large pool of those needing welfare. Moreover Thailand has an aging population who will soon become net beneficiaries of welfare. We also have a large pool of unemployed young people who are not interested in be part of the work force. No doubt it will need serious reform and continuity (no coups). Thailand may perhaps look at the eastern approach to welfarism like in Singapore. 

    • Like 2
  5. 6 hours ago, webfact said:

    He told The Nation that Malaysia’s newly appointed peace facilitator, Abdul Rahim Noor, a former police chief who is knowledgeable about the security situation along our countries’ common border, is determined to get the peace process properly up and running in the Thai South.

    Abdul Rahim Noor, the IGP who gave Anwar the black eye when he was handcuffed and in custody. That must be awkward when PM designate Anwar become prime minister. In any case, Rahim Noor has little experience and contact with the current BRN although he made that claim. His only involvement was an observer in the signing of the peace treaty with the Communist Party of Malaya in Hatyai. He served under Mahathir and got the job because of their relationship. I don't see him contributing much to the peace process. Mahathir has little interest to solve the south problem too. He is mindful of his own Malay constituent backlash which has been very vocal recently. Thailand got to carry the heavy load themselves if they want to bring peace to the south.  

×
×
  • Create New...
""