candide

Sure! There's no impeachment because they are afraid of Harris becoming President, not because they don't have any evidence. Typical MAGA reasoning. (well, should I call it "reasoning"?) FD-1023 anyone?

You're not expecting any coherence in the MAGA parallel universe, are you?

Actually, even after winning the 2016 election, he claimed the 2016 election had been rigged because he was pissed off that Hillary won the popular vote. He even created an investigation commission, which went nowhere, as all other GOP committees! 😀

B.S. conspiracy theories again. Trump did what he did. The Dems did not make it up. Give me 11,800 votes, the fake elector plot, Trump hiding documents and lying about it, etc... it's not made up.

You're "not a MAGA" but you write your posts with MAGA conspiracy theories! 😀

No. It's even if he's not elected, "he won the election because the election has been rigged". It's the line of thinking which is collapsing the country.

Now 36.42. It seems it slowly goes down every day.

Right. Trump went up until recently. Since January, both were actually going up, and Biden recently went up faster than Trump. There has been no Trump decline so far.

I have no expertise about it. The article mentions the opinion from experts, that's all I know.

The website takes time before showing all tables and graphs. There's a table with all polls by date, and also an historical graph before ( attached below). Having said that, I have no idea whether the recent short-term trend will go on or not. Actually the trend change is due to the decrease of the "unsure" category In replies. It seems that the "unsure" are progressively making a choice, and more of them choose Biden rather than Trump.

A part of the article worth quoting: "The little-known insurance company that rescued Donald Trump by providing a last-minute $175 million bank fraud bond isn’t just unlicensed in New York; it hasn’t even been vetted by a voluntary state entity that would verify it meets minimum “eligibility standards” to prove financial stability. Perhaps even more troubling, the legal document from Knight Specialty Insurance Company doesn’t actually promise it will pay the money if the former president loses his $464 million bank fraud case on appeal. Instead, it says Trump will pay, negating the whole point of an insurance company guarantee, according to three legal and bond experts who reviewed the contract for The Daily Beast."

So it's not Trump who called them to a protest called "Stop the steal" and asked them to march to the Capitol? Was the protest called "Stop the BLM"? Another example of MAGA claim's complete incoherence! 😀

They should be severly punished for having assaulted the Capitol in an attempt to steal elections! 😀

Baseless claim. It's Trump who sent them to march to the Capitol, not the BLM.

Lol! Are you leaving in his head to know what he really meant? Anyway, in case of doubt, let's put a gag order on Schumer for his trial by the Supreme Court! 😀

He has clarified what he said! https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/schumer-denies-threatening-supreme-court-justices-says-i-shouldn-t-n1150446 Waiting for Trump to declare he should not have used the words he said... 😀

Not any more, it seems.... https://www.racetothewh.com/president/polls#google_vignette

Says someone who considers Trump's complaints as proof! 😀 But don't hesitate to contact me for apologizes after an appeal court has validated this "proof". I will gladly oblige.

It's not my habit to defend Trump, but we must be honest and admit he already passed a quite difficult test! The last questions are much more difficult,” he said. “Like a memory question. It’s, uh, like you’ll go, ‘Person, woman, man, camera, TV.’ So they say, ‘Could you repeat that?’ So I said, ‘Yeah.’ So it’s ‘person, woman, man, camera, TV.’ ‘Okay, that’s very good.’”The doctors said very few people can do that, very few people get that,” Trump elaborated, with evident pride. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/07/trump-repeated-5-words-person-woman-man-camera-tx-dementia-cognitive-test.html 😀

Don't be impatient! Let's wait for an appeal court to decide if Trump's "proof" is valid or not.

Why should I lose my time reading the numerous attempts by Trump to delay his trials? No proof until an appeal court decides so. Don't be impatient! 😀 I have provided plenty of examples in the links. If you don't like them, go search by yourself.

It was a personal interpretation, not an assertion. About your links. Not proof, just Trump's defense claim!

Which claim did I make?

I don't know if it's caused by Brexit or not. It's just not a sign of "doing just well" I did not pick anything. These were the two examples given in the article to justify the comment that "we're not out of the woods yet"

Not only that. Trump is trying the get emotional reactions from judges, which would result in unfair or unbalanced decisions he could then appeal. However, they are too smart to fall into this pathetic kind of traps. 😀