candide

1. Providing only one example would be anedoctical, so it's better to provide several examples which can be compared and analysed. In particular as Frank83628 has not precisely specified which type of example. 2. If some posters are so keen about examples, they can do the search by themselves instead of trolling.

What's your point? If it's at the weakest level since 2013, it cannot be a sign of "doing just fine", can it?

Sir Trollsalot with nothing again! 😀

You want examples of gag orders in other cases? Google is our friend.... https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/10/21/gag-order-violations-roger-stone-marilyn-mosby/ https://www.af-lawfirm.com/blog/2021/july/gag-orders-in-federal-criminal-matters-speech-an/ Edit. Note that most defendants don't insult, smear or threaten Judges, court staff, witnesses and their families, so there may not be a large number of cases.

"but experts said 'we're not out of the woods yet' as measures of business optimism and employment rates both tumbled. BDO's business optimism index declined by 0.16 points to 99.33 – the first drop since November. And the employment index fell for the ninth consecutive month to 98.32 last month – its weakest point in nearly 11 years."

Contact Comer and Jordan! They desperately need witnesses! 😀

What about the pshychology of someone who stresses he's not a Trumper, and yet has written an immense number of posts supporting Trump? 😀

Free Donald Mandela! 😅

That's not the topic discussed here. BTW, I have shown data to support it and provided an explanation (the law of supply and demand). You have shown nothing to contradict my claim! 😁

Unlike you, I am not assuming anything.

You are assuming that what was shown on the website was the authentic and unaltered diary. There is no confirmation of it.

Trump is becoming completely nuts! After comparing himself to Jesus Christ, It's now with Nelson Mandela! 🤣 Trump Says He’ll Become ‘Modern Day Nelson Mandela’ Over Right to Attack Judge’s Daughter https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-ll-become-modern-204752129.html

Interesting question: Why has Illisdean stopped overflowing this thread with Biden vs Trump election polls' results? 🤣

Back to topic. Comer claims an IRS whistleblower said the CIA prevented Morris from being interviewed by the IRS, while another IRS whistleblower already testified he actually interviewed Morris. Of course, Comer refuses to communicate the elements he's supposed to have to the Dem Committee members. Hmmm.....

So the GOP fake committee chairman lied, as usual, and is trying to hide it! 😀 Morris which the CIA allegedly prevented from being interviewed, was actually interviewed! Pathetic! 😀

May I correct you? From an unauthenticated stolen diary.

It's you who absolutely want something unproven to be true. I don't want anything. I just recall to your attention that It's unproven and unauthenticated. But as I wrote before, in the MAGA alternate universe, unproven often means true.

Ridiculous, he was caught hiding documents and lying about it!

She did not state this second option is valid, she just asked the two parties to provide alternative arguments. I also doubt she knows better than the NARA, who's job is to apply the PRA, among others. (Source provided before) There's nothing written in the PRA that says that an outgoing President has the authority to convert Presidential records (as defined precisely in the PRA. Source provided before) into personal records. It also specifies that sorting the documents must happen before the outgoing President goes.

Not at all! As I wrote before in another post, if Trump had given back the documents when asked, there would have been no prosecution. One reason being, as the Republican prosecutor made clear, that it is very difficult to prove intent beyond reasonable doubt. The other reason is the the NARA would probably not even have notified the DOJ if it had got the documents back. The NARA notified the DOJ, after waiting for one year, only because Trump did not give back the documents. And Trump got indicted only after he was caught hiding documents and lying about it. This not only added new "crimes" to the initial one, but also proved beyond any reasonable doubt that that there was an "intent" for the "initial crime"

Which facts did you bring up? I did not see any...

"Americas untold story site says it's true"! 😃

Has its authenticity been confirmed? Has the authenticity of every page been confirmed? 😃

Not grasping at straws at all. Facts+ basic economic reasoning. Now, as you seem to be keen on challenging my assertions based on facts, why don't you bring up facts to contradict my assertions?

I know. In the MAGA universe, "unproven" is equivalent to "It's true". 😆