34 minutes ago, Logosone said:

My apologies, even the Euro trading operations are leaving already. The second phase of the exodus has begun:

 

JPMorgan Chase buys second Paris office as post-Brexit plan accelerates

Bank to shift more staff out of London after purchasing seven-storey building

 

JPMorgan Chase has bought a second building in Paris that can house up to 450 employees, as it steps up the shift of its euro-related trading operations out of London due to Brexit.

 

Paris is emerging as a winner from the dislocation, particularly as a hub for investment bank sales and trading. It has attracted institutions such as Bank of America, which has opened a new trading floor with room for 1,000 staff. HSBC is also moving as many as 1,000 jobs to France from Canary Wharf. Meanwhile, the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock, has made Paris, not London, its new base to provide “alternative” investment services across Europe and Asia after a charm offensive led by French president Emmanuel Macron.

 

https://www.ft.com/content/1189ae1e-3b71-11ea-a01a-bae547046735

Macron has been smart enough to change the French tax policy in anticipation of Brexit.

However, one should not solely focus on the EU. If there is no particular UK-EU agreement, New York may likely be more competitive than London for some activities.

4 minutes ago, twocatsmac said:

They surely have that right or do you believe otherwise ?

Does the right of protest now only belong to the looney left in America?

Faceache has done a pretty good job of protecting anti American terrorists and now they want to give a leg up to the “not the Democratic Party”

Carry on. 

Instructions received! ????

When Trump says he has plans,  we have all reasons to be worried....

I am surprised that Trumpers did not already start complaining about discrimination by social media.

3 hours ago, izod10 said:

3.6 are going. No matter what amendments were stated, even one case individual here for 40 years,now appealing  against notice to quit   Hol   now that is something else Baroness Flather was tabled a FoI request,   how many muslim immigrant households receive any form of welfare ,answer 85%.  Well published approx 7 years ago,now no evidence,even request from her ,she will not answer that q. Cover up after cover up,but the evidence is there just what is read re crime,esp London.. Bradford,Blackburn hell holes.   Universal Credit is a marvellous leveller,religious duty,apparrel,language,no work ,no pay with PC to follow,why get shut? let them suffer

 

   Getting slung out is one thing ,cutting any means of survival is another,hell they will be pouring out,no work ,no pay ,no housing,no nothing

Complete BS

1 hour ago, izod10 said:

Boris has the number he wants shut of 3.6 million,that are known to be from EU.   Cut off point January next year.

You come up once more with the same phony claim as before. You are trolling again.

"Calls to offer a unilateral guarantee to EU nationals and indeed the House of Lords amendment to the Article 50 Bill only scratch the surface of the issues involved. They also ignore the fact that approximately 85% of the 3.6 million EU citizens now in the UK will have been in the UK for at least five years by the time that the UK leaves the EU and that very large numbers will already acquired the right to permanent residence by then."

https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/briefing-paper/405/the-rights-of-eu-nationals-in-the-uk-post-brexit

On 3/2/2020 at 7:18 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

You are correct, Trump has done a lot.

 

Like firing the US Pandemic Response Team in 2018.

 

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-fire-pandemic-team/

The usual Trump's m.o.: no anticipation and then talk any B.S. when confronted with the consequences.

It seems that people don't buy it this time, I.e. even the Rassmussen poll which usually shows a significant pro-Trump bias has been indicating negative scores for a few days now.

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_updates/prez_track_mar03

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/daily-presidential-tracking-poll/ar-AADKLI1

28 minutes ago, looking on the bright side said:

To Stevenl and Candide :No point in arguing , you can think what you wish, I agree . Whoever says different is a Russian blogger for you. That is why Trump will have a landslide win. Have a nice evening!

Berruyer is a known pro-Russia blogger in France and frequently interviewed by RT and Sputnik.

8 minutes ago, looking on the bright side said:

Here is a report ,and it is not the only one, about Viktor Shokin filing a complaint against Joe Biden. 

Please, check  https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/breaking-fired-ukrainian-prosecutor-viktor-shokin-files-complaint-against-joe-biden/

 

So what? The corrupt prosecutor fired at the request of the US, the EU, the IMF and the Ukrainian parliament is not happy and filed a complaint. How does it proves anything? Ukrainian officials have already stated there was no investigation.

By the way, the source quoted in the article is a French pro-Russia bligger who is suspected of belonging to the Russian disinformation network. Surprising, isn't it?

3 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

I suppose I could ask the same of how the crooked Dems and Obama era FBI opened up an investigation on

Citizen Trump....based on some cooked up BS based purely on appearances and no proof. The investigation and its many subpoenas that followed were supposed to provide incontrovertible evidence but it turned out to be a lie.

 

Now the shoe is on the other foot....expect no mercy for Joe.

According to IG the investigation on Russian interference was properly predicated.

Until now, there has been no official investigation into Biden, likely because they find it hard to properly predicate it.

The Senate commission is collecting information and plans some hearings, let's see if they find enough ground to launch an official investigation. It is very far from it, yet.

55 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said:

Father point man on Ukraine, at time when Ukrainian oil company needs investigations to into CEO to end, re gas leases. Prosecutor forced out, more crooked prosecutor put in, son Hunter is passed through over 3 million USD. Seemingly because prosecutor was off Burisma back. 

 

Yeah, let's have a look. The son has been a scumbag in all he has done, I think more scum will be found. And I want the Biden's China scam looked at too.

It's not true. There was no active investigation.

https://www.justsecurity.org/66271/timeline-trump-giuliani-bidens-and-ukrainegate/

39 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

No, he's not a politician. But the laws on corruption apply to him. 

 

And his Daddy is most certainly a politician.

 

His appointment to a foreign firm, for which he was totally unqualified, whilst his VPOTUS Daddy was responsible for American relations with that country might suggest something a little strange to even the dumbest most naive person perchance?

 

And now it seems he may have been traveling around at tax payer expense too.

 

They were under the radar until they crawled out from under their stone and shone the light on themselves. 

 

 

So where is the evidence of corruption? There is no evidence that Burisma got any money from the US government. That's easy to check, the current administration has access to all the information. Nothing has been shown.

7 minutes ago, Chiphigh said:

Please tell us what investigation was done by the previous administration on the clear conflict of interest by the Bidens. And what are you afraid of? You seemed to want everything to be investigated based on a phony unfounded dossier, but when you see a clear obvious example of corrupt cronyism you seem to be quite uninterested. 

Why are you complaining about the previous administration? The current administration did not start any investigation. So If the previous administration was guilty of some kind of misconduct about it, the current administration is just as guilty, if not more.

It's completely incoherent.

1 hour ago, Chiphigh said:

When the previous administration has tried to bury it and never allowed any investigation, why should we expect you to have any objective questions, while claiming bias, using your own biased perspective....? 

Wrong. It's the current administration which did not start any official investigation. The previous one did not block anything. And oh, surprise! The Republicans start now an investigation which will likely not be concluded before elections.

10 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

That is your opinion. I would argue that the impeachment process started with the Bidens corruption overseas in Ukraine and involved his son Hunter landing a job he was unqualified for, but only got it through and because of his father Joe. Trump then rightly started investigating it, and that appalling video "son of a bleep he got fired" came out then it was a lot of backpedaling and clumsy attempts to claim Biden was exonerated and cleared (false). So we have a chicken and egg conundrum. We will have to let the courts decide who is right and wrong. Still, this is dreadful timing for Joe.

There was no official investigation. How many times should we tell you before you understand.

2 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Well there were always going to be ramifications from the botched impeachment saga. Having the Bidens dirty laundry hung out at such a critical time was clearly a massive own goal by the democrats. And here we are. The Hunter gets captured by the game. 

In case you did not notice, the impeachment process started exactly for this reason: Trump trying to discredit Biden. So there is nothing new, Trump started to discredit Biden before being impeached, and the Republicans go on with it.