dinsdale

I bring you back to the case of early onset intervention and late onset intervention. If a study is set up to fail as in late intervention then the results will be constant.

This was before the Ivermectin doesn't work official narrative. As I remember positive results were shown from Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (which were being used) when administered at very early stages of onset.

My guess is there were studies of the efficacy of Ivermectin when given early and the results were positive but it got buried in favour of the negative result study when Ivermectin was administered too late. An almost free solution does not make billions of dollars for big pharma.

The thing that justified the killing of Ivermectin as a treatment was a study that used the prophylactic too late into the onset of the disease where it's efficacy is much reduced.

I'm no right wing conspiracy theory diehard. Indeed I'm not right wing but I have rational, independent thought and what this tells me is the conspiracy comes from big pharma, Fauci and the WHO not those who questioned the "mainstream science".

Restricting freedom of speech to only that which agreed with the narrative was certainly part of the plan. A very big part of it I would suggest. Pushed by CDC, pushed by legacy media etc. this has to be the 2nd greatest con job of all time and I'm NOT saying Covid isn't real. It is. It was made in and escaped from the Wuhan lab. Religion is still a clear 1st greatest con of all time.

Sorry my mistake. I meant gene therapy.

Your post is interesting. The Great Reset. This of course is a conspiracy theory. OR IS IT? One really does have to wonder.

It depends on how road fatalities are measured. I've heard died at the scene I've also heard died within 24 hrs. of the crash. Either way it definitely skews the number downwards.

Of course what this doesn't say is how many idiot car drivers were involved and/or caused the motorcycle crashes.

If there's a 24 hr. sun in Antarctica the world must be a rotating globe. Oddly this is what science says is the case. I guess the 100's of thousands that have seen it for themselves will also say it's the case.

Sorry. I must where you answered the question does a 24 hr sun occur in Antarctica during the summer. Maybe you could post again. Yes or No. As for your explanation as to how an Antarctic 24 hr. sun works on the Gleason map. Remember that the flat earth grifters tell you it's not possible. Well at least they used to. I'm sure they've been working on a new model since TFE was announced because they knew what the result would be. A 24 hr. sun because the earth is a rotating sphere. They know it is.

Evidence like a 24 hr. sun in Antarctica. You still haven't explained how this is possible on the Gleason map.

As I said there is zero evidence the earth is flat as is there's zero evidence of the existence of god.

Sadly many on here will not agree. I remember some espousing that injecting the experimental DNA therapy was the only way to go and natural immunity was seen as dis or misinformation. My thinking is that without lockdowns the virus would have evolved faster into what it is now i.e. Omicron a cold or flu like virus that for the vast majority is non-severe.

Please explain why? If anything is nonsensical it's a belief in the earth being flat and it is a "belief" because there is absolutely nothing to support it that can't be debunked by science and ration thought.

Sadly the reality we live in is not so good and also sadly there are very many people whose reality in their own minds doesn't match reality. Reality is the earth isn't flat. No one has proved it to be so. ZERO evidence. Why? Because it ISN'T FLAT. IT ISN'T a NASA conspiracy. IT ISN'T the Freemasons. It's a con pushed by grifters to make money and believed by the gullible. 24 hour sun in Antarctica. That's it. It happens. Can't happen on the Gleason map. The grifters and their flock are now trying to debunk actual footage of this being released by The Final Experiment.

24 hour sun. Yes or no?

Yep. Not possible on any flat earth model. The north is possible but not the "south".

No it's not. Science isn't a belief system. Again the Antarctic continent is a vey big and very extreme environment and is controlled by the treaty to keep it neutral, have no mining and no military presence. You keep throwing comments back yet you haven't addressed my posts about people/civilians can go to the south pole and there is a 24hr sun in the Antarctic summer. Here's a direct question. Is there a 24 hour sun in Antarctica in it's summer? This is a Yes/No question. a) Yes, there is. b) No, there isn't. It's not possible. What's your answer. a) or b)?

What sort of a question is this. We live in a diverse world. Body positivity is a good thing.

Sure can. Depending on the situation and as a foreigner it might just be better to handover the tea money.

Sure these places are simply inaccessible. Reason being your chances of dying are high. Doesn't change the fact that anyone who has the money can venture to inland regions of Antarctica and the South Pole. Flerfs say you can't. Well the fact is you can. All the people who go there in summer will see is a 24 hour sun. Flerfs say this isn't possible. It's not just possible it's reality and it's realty because the earth is a rotating oblate speroid. I'm sorry but having any belief system IMHO defies reality. The flat earth belief is one of these systems of belief. It's believed by very few people, pushed by even fewer grifters and accepted as truth by the gullible. Bit like religion.

The answer to your question is the US. It's called the NGAD (Next Generation Air Dominance)