dinsdale

Guys a nutter. Just like all those blue haired lesbos and rainbow haired activist trannies having breakdowns because Trump won. Radicalism/activism and mental illness seem to go hand in hand now. Never used to be this way IMHO. Having said this religious nutters have always been nutters.

Strategically it's a big hit but doesn't cripple Russia's strategic bomber fleet. It could've been a lot worse for Russia. Not all attacks succeeded. Seems only 30% got through. It won't change what's happening on the ground. Jets hit aren't frontline bombers/attack bombers. This is after all a ground war.

Thanks. They are indeed. I should've have said hypersonic mid-range ballistic missiles. Thanks for the correction.

Several aerodromes wiped out. Are you sure? Sounds like something the BBC would say or Ukraine state media. Maybe you can support this comment.

Hypersonic intercontinental missiles.

So basically you didn't know that these jets are very rarely used for strikes into Ukraine if at all for most of them and there are two other main jets for this as I explained and your reply is this. Great stuff. The jets hit are high asset intercontinental nuclear capable bombers. Absolutely no reason to put them at risk in this war. You don't know what you're talking about so stop talking about it.

They rarely use these for strikes. Way to valuable of an asset. The SU-34 and SU-25 are the jets doing the most damage on the battlefield dropping FAB's from Russian controlled regions. Try not to make out you know what you talking about. As for just parking up aircraft on runways you once again show your ignorance. This was more than 4000 km away out of range of missiles and drones. Obviously not out of range of trucks carrying drones. Closer to the front precautions are taken.

Let's see the link.

It's a fair question. Why don't you answer it rather than deflect? Of course tactically there is no benefit at all but do you think there's an actual strategic benefit? Be good if you could actually answer the question. So many on here never do.

2027. Get real. Too late and the EU knows this. The EU has been funding Putin's war because it's dependent on the fuel.

I never said it wasn't. Please show me where I said this. I said heads will roll but it wont be Putin's.

What you said is you don't know. I asked very nicely who do you think is winning the war. You said you don't know. I never said you said Russia isn't winning the war. You can deflect as much as you like but the question is who do you think is winning the ground war? Again this is not Putin cheering it's simply the reality on the battlefield. Ukraine winning. Russian forces pushed back. Russia winning. Russian forces advancing. Can't get more basic than this. Russian forces are advancing. So why don't you know. It's pretty simple. It's war. The side gaining ground is at the time winning. Do you think Ukraine can win militarily and push Russia back across the border? Simple yes, no questions. Again you won't answer any of these direct questions and simply deflect because that's the sort of person you are. Mind you you're never shy of insults and personal attacks so maybe that's the response I'll get. Not an adult answering questions but a puerile adolescent reply.

Ridiculous comment. For sure Putin thought this would be a breeze but it obviously wasn't. Ukraine had the chance to push Russia back across the border in 2022 but they couldn't. Things have changed significantly since then. If a paper tiger is winning the war then how would you describe the other side? Please say Russia isn't winning the war just to demonstrate your knowledge or obvious lack thereof of what is actually happening.

Indeed. Just another brainless post. It really is pitiful. Everyone knows Putin is a dictator, everyone knows Trump isn't and everyone should know China is the real threat.

Again, and I say again only for the dimwitted, I've never "cheered" one side or the other on here about this war. What I post is always neutral and I challenge you to show where it hasn't been. I know you can't because as everyone knows on here you simply troll. Always deflect. To say you don't know that Russia is winning the ground war means any comment on this topic from you is not grounded in reality. As for school children showing arrows pointing one way not the other doesn't need a guess.

Why don't you know? The war front continues to move west as Russian forces capture more territory. Even a primary school child could answer the question of who's winning the ground war. Sadly it seems you can't.

Hi mate. Fantastic post. Up to your standard. Answer this question. Who's winning the war? Of course you won't answer because you never do. No balls. p.s. love the emoji.

Actually it's the other way round. The summer offensive on the ground will see IMO, and the way things are going, much more Ukrainian territory taken.

Yes to the first bit (actually the SBU) but as for the second bit this will be a blow more to those who should have protected the assets than Putin but you're welcome to exist in your own little world.

Another thumbs down for above war map post. What a moron you are. A person posts almost up to date war maps with a neutral assessment and the response is a thumbs down from an anonymized idiot. Is it thumbs down because you think it's all propaganda and doesn't fit that intellectually stagnant organ between your ears? No man enough to actually reply? Pitiful.

That's an interesting fact. Seem like it's been in the planning for around 18 months. I must say a very impressive plan and operation.

This ain't WWII or the Vietnam war mate. The most effective bomb being used by Russia are the FAB's and they're being dropped by SU 34's from behind the front lines. BTW how do you explain the bridges being blown up. One collapsing onto a train and the other with a train on it. As for "you guys" let me point out once again (as I have to for the dimwitted every now and again) I just call it as I see it. No side taken. As for "intentionally, daily, routinely targets civilians" This is a bit of an overreach. Yes, civilians are killed. Are they directly targeted? This is another thing. There's such a thing in the international laws of war as legitimate targets and acceptable collateral damage i.e. killing non-combatants. Believe me my opinion on this war is it needs to stop and Putin is an rshole and so is Zelensky and so is the EU and so were the war mongers in the Biden administration.

I got a thumbs down for this. Why? This is what the situation looks like or there about. DeepState is Ukrainian so it's usually worse than shown. Eventually catches up but again is slow to update. Some people on here are just complete idiots. There are multiple other war mappers. Go and look. I've said so many times and I'll say it again Russia is winning the ground war albeit slowly because this is A WAR OF PROTRACTED ATTRITION. I've simply stated the situation yet some moron, probably will be joined by others, gives the thumbs down.

This is something you really need to back up. How about a source or two otherwise this can only be seen as something you've made up.

There are "Putin stooges" for sure. Just as there are "Zelensky stooges". Then there are those who who have rational thought. Where would you place yourself. Your history of posts suggests not the latter.