BangkokReady

Yeah, you cannot film private property without permission, even if you are standing on public property. Also, it's kind of rude to film people anyway. I always find it annoying when I see someone with a mike and a smartphone. I know we don't have a right to really have an expectation of privacy when we are out in public, but I don't really want to end up in the background of a YouTube video. It gets to the point where, if someone is making money from filming members of the public, where is the cut for the community they are using?

Why don't you want to answer the question? What weakness in your argument are you protecting?

That's how I describe comments that deliberately ignore or misrepresent what I have said because the author doesn't want to debate or discuss, they only want to score a point for their side. You weren't trying to. That was my point. As I said, I already have done.

I'm not discussing the laws of Texas, Louisiana, and maybe Alabama.

Simple question, does she or not?

Doesn't the woman in some way consent to this responsibility when she chooses to have sex?

It's a human life from conception.

I think the act of rape would make it a different scenario.

Ah, well I can't really speak for Pattaya, I haven't really visited there.

And women having rights magically nullifies men's feelings?

So, bad faith argument then?

Isn't it more about the human life inside the female body? Literally no one actually says anything about the body itself.

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you then. Could you expand a little on how this: "Then as my post said, she has the burden of 9 months pregnancy and can make her choice." In any way answers this: "Isn't it sad for a man that a woman can abort his baby and he has no say in it?"

So how does that relate to the post that you were originally replying to? "Isn't it sad for a man that a woman can abort his baby and he has no say in it?" Do you guys actually follow the discussion that you are having, or do you just say whatever comes into your head?

But it inevitably will grow into a full human if left to its own devices. Every baby is a potential human of which both the father and mother have a claim to.

But the baby is equally his.

And if she does?

1, It is an unborn baby, or a being that will become a baby. 2, It goes on within her body, but the unborn baby is a being of its own. 3, The issue is men being stripped of their rights over their unborn children.

Who said anything about rapists?

I feel my throat being attacked by pollution without a mask.

What if the man is wonderful, with a good job and wants to keep the baby that he made with a woman who now doesn't want it? Why does he need to be in the relationship in order to keep his baby?

That's one opinion. You could equally say that the baby is not "her body", so she doesn't have a choice.

Why would the mother support the child? In this scenario, the father wants the baby and the woman doesn't. Presumably the man would take the baby if he wanted it and the woman didn't. Besides, we know that regardless of the circumstances, the man will generally be made to pay.

Why would he need to respond to removing the wires? Someone removed incinerated wires and people want something done about it? Surely removing the wires would be a good thing?

Isn't it sad for a man that a woman can abort his baby and he has no say in it?