BangkokReady

Why? What's wrong with an adult male of any age wishing to have sex with an adult female of any age?

He was simply taking aim at too many people who are in power.

I'm sure things must be different from when humans first ventured to these areas. I can't imagine anyone moving through a much milder sunny climate and choosing to keep going until they find cold and gloominess.

He said exactly that. Keep trolling. ????

What on Earth do you think that I have written that is abusive?!! A tad dramatic.

So are all ages of men who wish to do this "creepy sex predators"?

I was simply asking the user to clarify an ambiguous comment so that their point was clear (if that is what they wanted) to facilitate discussion. If you choose see that as aggressive or "uncalm", that's up to you. ????‍♂️

As I thought. Just another troll. ????

I agree. I'm not sure why people act this way.

What was your understanding of it and why did you reach that conclusion?

Not looking for any argument. It's simply that you responded to someone's comment that people should obey the law with an ambiguous quote. Obviously you meant that quote to make some sort of point, as you chose it as a reply, but the point is unclear. As I pointed out, the quote could mean that you have to be stupid to obey the law, or only stupid people have to obey the law. Which interpretation you wanted to use obviously changes the meaning of your response. As I said, if you want your reply to remain ambiguous, that's fine, up to you, but it takes a lot of meaning away from your comment and limits its contribution to the discussion. No one can really formulate a response to your comment if it is ambiguous. ????‍♂️

Have you spent any time in the UK? It's wet, grey and miserable for about 9 months a year. It even seems to rain over Christmas now.

That would depend on the man. I'm sure most older men find much younger women attractive (e.g. a 60 year old guy who encounters an attractive 20 year old). I can't see any reason why not. They likely feel the need to pretend they don't though.

OK. So you weren't making a point, you were just posting an ambiguous quote without explanation in direct reply to someone else. You're free to do that, of course, but it reduces your contribution to the discussion considerably. "Your post was unclear, what do you mean?" "I don't know." "OK." ????‍♂️

It's quite interesting that "5 things you love" is a lot less popular than "5 things you hate". If anyone is curious, there's actually an evolutionary reason for this "negativity bias".

Why post something without a clear meaning? What point were you making?

I get that some people have the "creepy" idea because they find it unpleasant to see an ugly/old man express sexual desire for a young woman, but where does the perverted or sexual predator bit come from?

But does that mean that you would have to be a fool to obey the law, or that only wise men are qualified not to?

Some people lack the ability to think critically and appreciate nuance. I assume their idea of "hate" is to have every waking moment filled with anger and bitterness aimed at these topics.

The guy doesn't even know what "developing country" means, let alone how to select or analyse evidence. He obviously has some sort of issue with the UK.

Isn't it strange how foreigners know more about the reality of some elements of Thai culture than some Thais do?

Noise. Dangerous roads. Racism. Poor quality workmanship. Foreign Thai apologists/Thai supremacists.

Can't wait till she graduates and gets a good job. I hope nobody allows her to forget what she has claimed to have been denied (nor all the people who support her).

So if they didn't switch the coalition, they wouldn't let the PTP candidate be PM either?

It's tricky, becuase there isn't actually any corrupt wrong-doing now. It all happened years ago when the system was put in place. It's quite clever really, as it kind of fractures the causal chain and muddies the waters. Case in point, people are actually discussing the decisions of the senators much more than the legitimacy of their position. Realistically, they should have been protesting their power and appointment since day one.