
Andrew Dwyer
Advanced Member-
Posts
9,894 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Andrew Dwyer
-
Yes, again, if the pig fat is cooked enough I can eat it, love pork scratchings , it’s the slimy undercooked variety that I have trouble with.
-
I could probably eat the chicken feet soup if the feet were removed before eating but couldn’t chew on the feet !, am the same with beef and pork fat , it just doesn’t go down ????
-
Only jesting Owl, I know you are on the “ to be taken externally “ stage. I don’t like to eat any chicken skin ( unless crispy ) and scrape it off chicken breast and wings etc . As my dear old mum would say “ don’t be so nesh “
-
Chicken feet soup or the urine challenge ?, probably tastes the same imo. GF just finished some chicken feet soup and left the offending limb lying there like some galine autopsy , nearly put me off my spring rolls ! She did complain that the soup was a little spicy though ……. really ?
-
Yes, appears like another difference between immigration offices, some ask you to return at the end of the visa exempt stay and others use a 2 week template irrespective of when you apply. I applied at day 5 at Ayutthaya, of my 30 day exempt, and they gave me a 17 day return date. A friend did similar at Sisaket and got a 15 day return date. Another report recently of someone applying shortly after arriving and got a 42 day return date. Others are notified by phone when their O visa is ready. I suppose it makes no difference really as I don’t recall anyone reporting being refused on their return to pick up the visa stamp, any discrepancies would be picked up at application.
-
EV Owners … Real life experience & help thread
Andrew Dwyer replied to KhunLA's topic in Thailand Motor Discussion
Found out this week, via a FB MG group that there’s an update for MG ICE ( and possibly older ZS EV’s , not sure ) to stop the radio coming on automatically on startup and also for , my pet problem of, the radio coming on at maximum volume under certain circumstances. Had it installed Wednesday and so far so good, haven’t noticed any other changes. -
I had a 17 day notice to return when I applied for my O visa ( from a visa exempt ), the actual issue stamp was dated 10 days after my application. I would recommend anyone applying for an O visa from visa exempt to do it soon after arrival ( although the 45 days exempt is a better safety net ). Although they quote at least 15 days of exempt stay remaining that can cut it fine , always the 30 days extension on exempt available but 1,900 baht unnecessarily spent imo.
-
What work did you do back in your home country?
Andrew Dwyer replied to Non Immigrant's topic in ASEAN NOW Community Pub
Wringer-outer for a one-armed window cleaner. -
I think the requirement for a 12 month statement is Immigration Office dependent, my office ( Ayutthaya ) requested one for an OA extension but I understand other offices do not. I would expect if you weren’t asked for a 12 months statement in previous extensions then they probably won’t request one now either.
-
Did you read any of the topic ? The question was should I have to justify my previous extension when it became null and void and I started again with a new non imm visa. The answer being yes, at least for Ayutthaya immigration, and I have already ordered a 12 month statement to comply with their request.
-
Agree Bob, a friend of a friend arrived Hua Hin visa exempt opened a bank account, applied for an O visa and obtained an extension with a 3 month bank statement. My history of retirement extensions must have spurred the IO into requesting a 12 month statement for the reasons stated previously, maybe wouldn’t have happened in a different Immigration Office but c’est la vie .
-
Not sure if “ in house “ O visa is more of a headache or my IO is more of a headache !. Either way it’s all local so not too much hassle. I have a friend who is following the exact same route as me but 1 week later, he has a few hours round trip to his IO so would be well peeved if it happens to him, but turns out his bank will give a 12 month statement immediately so again not too much hassle. My choice of IO and bank has given me this result …….oh well , all part of Thailand’s rich tapestry ????
-
I guess it boils down to me thinking that i knew the requirements for extension of this O visa and omitting to visit the office yesterday to get the confirmed requirements. I would have still been annoyed at the request for a 12 month statement but could have visited the BKK Bank ( literally 100 metres away ) ordered said statement and be done by Thursday.
-
Yes, I realise that now from previous replies. What would be interesting would be their reaction if I had defaulted on the previous extension financial requirements and started over with an O visa because of this. Could they refuse my O extension based on a misdemeanour of my OA extension , or fine maybe ??
-
When initially planned incorporating a visit to my home country with an opportunity to lose the OA extension back in March 2020 I planned to get an O visa from a Thai consulate ( Hull ) . Of course Covid19 hit and the consulate closed so my trip was abandoned. When I finally decided I should make another attempt to lose the OA extension, May 2022 , the U.K. consulates were still closed and the alternative of obtaining an O visa from Thai Embassy was being reported as being complicated plus health insurance was also required so I chose to go the visa exempt/O visa in house route. Am not sure if health insurance is still required for an O visa from Thai Embassy in London is still required but visa exempt/O visa in house is simple and costs 2000 baht, with the extension the usual 1,900 baht and no health insurance required.
-
So, I understand that some IO’s request a 12 month statement on extension and some don’t but irrespective of this: Should I have to justify compliance from a previous extension with a 12 month statement when that story has finished and I am starting again with a new O visa and subsequent extension which, imho, should only require 2 months compliance of the 800k rule ??