Yellowtail

A "little different" indeed. I liked it.

try Gourmet Market, I think they have both. IMO, Nathans are way over-rated.

I meant do you trust his opinion, generally? I think the prosecutors are simply out to get Trump for political reasons. All the "facts" would have been known whether Trump had been reelected or not, and Biden would still have all his classifies documents.

I miss the dogs that used to have at Jiffy, loaded up with chopped onions, great quick bite on the road. My boy loves decent sausage, and he's in Germany this week so he's having a hay-day! They have these at Villa and Tops, and often buy-one-get one when close to expiry.

If you say, he'll pull up a hundred examples of how he has attacked Trump. "Even a blind hog gets an acorn every now and then."

Do you trust his opinion?

And what is the "criminal nature" of Trump's orders? How is paying someone to keep quiet illegal? Yeah, I agree, the jurors really need to "connect the dots" to GET Trump.

No, not at all.

The left has to stop assimilation at all cost, divide and concur.

Sorry, I misspoke, what I meant to say was: "No one is claiming no illegals got across the border and into the US during the Trump administration, and even though the left did everything in their power to keep it open, the border was largely closed when Trump left office." People that want open borders should vote for Biden, people that don't, should vote for Trump.

No, do you have a quote?

The moment the conversation turns to Biden his supporters start talking about Trump. It's a tacit admission that they have nothing supportive to offer.

It's sad regardless.

How does a Thai get cash by selling air as water when the state collects the money? If air is passing though the meter, nothing after the meter is going to change that.

The Rothschilds probably got to them.

There are a lot of things Trump has said and done that are embarrassing. The court cases are not among them. Whan the state has to change laws and or make up new laws to get someone, it is the state that should be embarrassed. I believe Trump may or may not have had consensual sex with the porn actress, but having sex with a porn actress is not illegal, nor is paying them to keep quiet. At the time the E. Jean Carroll story took place, Trump was about 40, and a rich, arguably handsome, tall, popular, New York playboy. E. Jean Carroll's claim is that she (the about 43) willingly accompanied him into Bergdorf Goodman dressing room dressing room to fool around, but that that she'd had second thoughts, and that Trump then raped her. We are supposed to believe that a rape in the dressing room of a busy, high-end New York department store in the middle of the did not draw any attention. I do not believe her story. Interestingly: "In 2012 — seven years before E. Jean Carroll publicly accused Donald Trump of raping her — "Law & Order: SVU" aired an episode featuring a rape in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room, while a victim was trying on lingerie. Carroll's allegations against Trump, first published in a book excerpt in New York magazine in 2019, sounded remarkably similar. She claimed that, in the mid-1990s, Trump raped her in the dressing room of Bergdorf Goodman's lingerie section." E. Jean Carroll Talks 'SVU' Episode With Rape Similar to Trump Claim (businessinsider.com)

Doesn't matter.

Danderman is the same guy that posted a photo of illegals that was taken after Biden took office, and says it was during the Trump administration. After you find the origin of the photo and show Danderman that he is wrong, he changes the subject. Then later Danderman posts the same photo of illegals that was taken after Biden took office, and again lies and says it was during the Trump administration. After you show Danderman the post that includes the photo, the origin of the photo and shows that he is wrong again, he again changes the subject. "Truth is not a left-wing value'"

I think he's winning the case as well, but I did not say that, what I said was: "I think most people expect he will be convicted." Trump’s lawyer pays Stormy’s lawyer to influence one party to enter into an NDA with another party, which is legal. Stormy’s lawyer pays Stormy to enter into an NDA with another party, which is legal. An NDA is payment in consideration of a contract, which is legal. Trump pays his lawyer and calls it legal expenses, which is legal. Stormy violates the contract, which is not legal. Trump is indicted, which is legal. I think he will be convicted as well. (which I think is not legal)

Did she work them off?

I think most people expect he will be convicted.

And most everyone working for a legitimate company. If a Thai works for a company that does not pay overtime, unless they are management, they can go to the labor department and the labor department will get them their money.

Yeah, he's always been a liar, a cheater and a racist, why bring it up now?