Chomper Higgot

It looks like the head kicking cop is on his way to class.

Yet more ill informed nonsense laced with your customary accusation of DEI whenever the selected person isn’t white.

I don’t recall even seeing a hammer, let alone getting ‘hammered down’. Are you making stuff up?

As in storming the Capitol to stop the certification of the election result?

Oh you mean Democrats support the Democrat Party and will gladly back an alternative Democrat Candidate. OK. So not a cult then.

Moths to a flame? I’m shocked to learn opinions I post are my own.

I’ve stated precisely why the Republicans don’t have the same opportunity to change their candidate. 1. Trump will not step down. 2. The Republicans will not separate themselves from Trump. This Democrat cult you imagine is very strange. Last week the Democrat’s presumptive candidate was Joe Biden, he withdrew and now the presumptive Democrat candidate is Kamala Harris. That’s an odd way for a cult to behave.

Enough of your fuzzy use of language. No I am not saying ‘Trump can’t step down’ not implying that is how ‘it’s set up’. Trump will not step down, and the Republicans will not separate themselves from Trump. Hence the cult, recently referred to by no other than Elon Musk, so not something of my own imagination. I’ll pass on your personal attack.

Let’s parce this; Strong anti gay views. Talks about homosexuality being a sin. Shares his collection of videos promoting masculinity. …

I suggest you read up on who funds who.

No they do not. The GOP are wedded to Trump, it’s a cult, that’s how cults works. There is no other choice but Trump. However, I wouldn’t bet on Vance lasting.

Unable to come to terms with the outcome subject case you invent a new one to feed your need for grievance.

That’s what’s known as a non sequitur.

Nothing wrong with Christians, so long as they aren’t indoctrinating other people’s kids.

We are not discussing the MET.

Clearly not, the screwed up math teacher and his insanity have been removed.

Thank you Jonny for inventing points of view for me which I myself have never addressed. Feel free to continue by arguing with the points of view you yourself invented.

Actually there’s a lot of discussion about policy. It’s probably not reaching you.

Thanks for inventing a point of view on my behalf.

I agree. The Telegraph report fails to understand a complex problem can’t be fixed in three weeks.

This bit is: “It paid extraordinary dividends, achieving a 48 per cent decrease in non-sexual violent crime, a 38 per cent fall in homicide and a 43 per cent fall in attempted murder and serious assault since 2006/7.” That it was achieved by a broad swath of policies is not disputed. But here’s a thing, it wasn’t achieved resorting to the overt racism Richard calls for; “Sorry Keir, but unless you lock up all the blacks 24/7in London it will just keep getting worse” It seems the lessons of the ‘suss laws’ have been forgotten.

I think I knew that, but thanks anyway.

There’s a reason it sounds racist Richard. Because it is. “Nothing has worked in the past” Except something has worked in the past: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-45572691

I rather like the idea of it being a bait and switch. I doubt very much it was, but the thought of the lifelong conman Donald Trump falling for a bait and switch is too pleasant to let go.

Which branch of mathematics requires any discussion on homosexuality, let alone sin? As for a math teacher students videos on the subject of ‘masculinity’?! Of course he thinks it’s acceptable because he’s ‘a Christian’. I think the term creep fits better.