Chomper Higgot

Let’s put you to the test. Provide evidence to back up your claim that ‘Donors to the Democrats are making $trillions on immigration programs’. Give it your best shot, put up the evidence or be owned by your own baseless claims.

You could not have said it better: “the rambling writings and fanatical musing”

It’s not an ‘accusation’ that has been used to remove Trump from the ballot.

Supporting the bid for admirers of Hitler to win public office is definitely relevant ‘dirt’ on someone in public office making accusations of antisemitism. If nothing else it reveals the hypocrisy and absurdity of your claim. “ In 2023, the anti-semitism comes firmly from the left.” Antisemitism is widespread, especially in the US and is not the reserve of left or right.

What is enough of an accusation is a matter for debate, but their is no requirement in the Fourtheenth Amendment for a guilty verdict in a court of law. If you had ever read the Fourteenth Amendment you would have at least had the opportunity to be less ill informed on the matter. To better inform yourself, I recommend you look up the ruling of Justice Neil Gorsuch on the matter of the rights of the States to choose who gets on the ballot.

Putting the episode in the correct context of the publically expressed views of the two people engaged in the questioning is not whataboutism. It is however background knowledge missing from your customary ill informed posts on anything to do with the U.S.

Gray’s questioner was Republican Elise Stefanik who endorsed Carl Paladino after his gushing praise of Hitler. Bit of Republican accusation/confession going on.

Can you please provide a link to where the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states ‘a conviction in a court of laws’ law a necessary requirement for the Amendment clauses to be enacted?

Forgive me for being prudish over Epstein’s pedophilia.

Well they don’t if they are between consenting adults. But Epstein wasn’t dealing in consulting adults was he?!

Why on earth should I answer your question that bears absolutely no relation to anything I’ve said, opinion I have expressed or opinion I might rationally be considered to hold? It was you who introduced Amendment into this discussion. Nobody else owes you any answers to address such off the wall nonsense,

I posted a link, you’ll find it above.

You are rambling, manically it would seem.

You were wondering why evidence of a prospective candidate for the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election who relies on a Christian Evangelicals, and rightwing moral crusaders for much of his support being a frequent flyer and associate of a notorious pedophile might be an issue? Then you stretched your brain to come to some kind of ridiculous conclusion that I might consider the issue to be something to do with an ‘Amendment’ prohibiting flying on private jets. 0 out of 10. You really must try harder.

Oh look, a bit of whataboutary. Perhaps discussing which hopefuls in the 2024 presidential race are named and proven frequent traveling buddies with the pedophile Epstein on his ‘Lolita Express’ is a little uncomfortable given folk will soon have to decide who to vote for. The guy who hangs out with pedophiles or the guy who doesn’t. The stink around Trump is widely reported and real.

Can you please point out where I stated, or even suggested, any ‘Amendment’ prohibits travel on a private jet?

$Trillions in tax give seats to the hyper wealthy don’t seem to bother you.

Ill informed nonsense trolling.

Clinton isn’t ‘my boy’, nor is he hoping to stand for election to President of the United States in 2024. There is one hopeful for the 2024 presidential elections named as a passenger on the ‘Lolita Express’ and he’s named multiple times. Oh, and his name isn’t Biden.

Lay off the whataboutary.

He certainly was, and he gets multiple mentions: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10331943/amp/Trump-flew-seven-times-Jeffrey-Epsteins-private-Lolita-Express-jet-flight-logs-reveal.html

So Biden ordered Putin to invade Ukraine and Hamas to go on a killing spree in Israel. Who knew?!

It’s meaningless to state Democrat confidence in elections alongside of those of Republicans if no sense of why each group holds their views. Democrats might reasonably question election integrity where Republican administrations have enacted gerrymandering policies targeting Democrat voters, while Republicans might, as an example, buy into fruitcake scribblings in an anonymously authored 32 page stack of nonsense. I myself would like to be sure that the election returns submitted to Congress are signed off by real Electors and not by slates of fake electors returning fake results in a criminal conspiracy to override the vote and keep a stinking man child in office when the electorate have democratically voted him out. Fortunately we don’t need to puzzle our heads over this, the courts have returned scores of rulings dismissing claims of election fraud and the DOJ is in the process of prosecuting those who actually attempted to overthrow the election. It’s helpful that some of these anti democratic extremists signed their own names on fake elector documents and submitted them to Congress. Their attempt to fraudulently overthrow the legitimate election result is a matter of Congressional Records with their own signatures appended. So give up this gas lighting hs of yours. And please print your 32 page anonymous dossier on softer paper, it might be then comfortably put to the only use it’s fit for, perhaps by Trump himself, I hear he has a problem in that area.

There is a sniffing problem, it’s widely reported the stench is oozing out of Trump.

Like who has time to read 32 pages of garbage assembled by someone who won’t even put their own name to it? That’s not a lack of curiosity, it’s a short cut to avoiding the brown stuff that comes out he back r d of horses.