The problem with 100% true is it can’t be applied when referring to complex causes.
There was indeed ‘a need’ to borrow to spend during the pandemic.
There was absolutely not ‘a need’ to hand $1.3 Trillion in tax breaks to the hyper wealthy and high profit corporations.
Starmer is engaging in the wise policy if not interrupting your enemy while they are making mistakes.
He need only remind the electorate that while the Tories squabble the key issues faced by the nation are getting worse and getting zero attention from the Tories.
This ‘Witch hunt’ that relies on the sworn testimony of Trump loyalists, his attorneys, members of his administration, Republicans and members of his own family.
We know as a matter of recorded fact Trump hid evidence and documents from his attorneys, why then pin hopes on Trump’s attorneys saying they can’t find documents?
Obviously you don’t understand the basic principle that a law cannot be broken if the law isn’t in place at the time.
The lockdown rules were changed more than once, thee rules in place at the time of Johnson’s partying were not the same as those at the time of Starmer’s work related event.
“Document No. 19 Formerly Restricted Data concerning nuclear weaponry of the United States.”
Now, why did he want to hold in to this and who had access to it?
He’s just been on FOX running his mouth again and destroying reasonable doubt arguments by the minute.
Trump’s mouth is an evidence rich environment.
Give him a ‘gag order’?
Nah, give him a stage a microphone and cameras to capture the flow of self incriminating statements as they flow.
The problem with your attempt of whataboutary is you fail to tell us what these ‘a lot worse things going on’ were.
People being denied visits to dying loved ones or to attend funerals of family members while parties were being held at Conservative Party HQ would be my punt.
The video under discussion reveals the attitude of those on camera towards the rules the rest of the nation was subjected to.
Starmer doesn’t make an appearance.
Back to Law 101 class you go Johnny.
Innocent until proven guilty.
……
Corruption in the Met is a matter of public record.
https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/crime-and-misconduct-within-the-metropolitan-police/
Don’t let the facts of the Police inquiry get in the way of your need for a baseless conspiracy:
https://www.durham.police.uk/News/News-Articles/2022/July/Durham-Constabulary-press-statement.aspx
Obviously you don’t understand my juxtaposition of the rules applied to the general public and the partying of the Conservative Party staff.
Or you choose not to.
Does groping meet the definition of sexual battery?
If so then groping is sexual battery regardless of rape.
But surely Trump has more pressing legal to deal with, perhaps not, perhaps he really can’t stomach a woman standing up to him.