Chomper Higgot

I have never once suggested you are a racist - not ever. I do not call other members racist, not ever.

I’m pleased for you that it all gives you a warm cuddly secure feeling, but it would be far better for you to face reality. Justice is coming.

I think that’s a variation on ‘some of my best friends are Black’.

This thread is not about Thailand, India Saudi Arabia, Africa or any other place than the UK. I’ve never claimed racism doesn’t exist in any other country.

It was her own MP’s that forced her to sack the Chancellor and will force a Budget U-turn, they are in danger of loosing their seats at the election, very many to Labour.

Are ‘the Left’ being blamed yet?

I’m not sure any of that is true, or otherwise misrepresented. Try this: You earlier mentioned furthering ‘political beliefs’. I Personally believe that non of the mainstream political parties are racist, not the Tories, Labour, Lib Dems, Greens, Scottish Nationalist, none of them. But there are political parties and movements in the UK that are profoundly racist. Racism is a fact n British society and politics. Deny that at cost to your credibility.

Racism exists in the UK, it’s a reality.

Oh no, the favored Guardian defense.

No logic is, if you can’t provide a verification of your opinion then your opinion is unverified. Here’s another logical argument for you. Observing racism isn’t a cause of racism.

It’s very much more likely that the King was aware that Truss was was deliberately seeking a ‘photo opportunity’. Who thought it a good idea to broadcast video of her meeting the King and why?

Logic.

I’d like her to hang on for the full term of the Government, these bar tenders need to deal with the mess they have created.

I said from the start, Truss is a gift to the opposition. I have to honest, I never really grasped how much of a gift.

I don’t disagree with Government reports written by the Civil Service with links to data included.

I notice the members who spend so much time ranting about immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers have been very quiet on Ukrainian refugees and have had virtually nothing to say about Russians fleeing overseas. So I’m not convinced by your argument.

What the police choose to investigate and what the law defines as a hate crime (of which racism is an example) are not necessarily the same thing. People report what they perceive to be a crime, the police investigate. Convictions in court are based on what the law says. The definitions under the law are very clear.

No, not only if I want it to be anything. It’s what the law says that counts: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/30/section/1/enacted

Still a slave.

Not so, hate crimes, like racism have a very clear legal definition. You’ll find it under ‘Definitions’ in the respective laws.

There are times witticisms are entirely appropriate and there are times when they are not. Read the report of how that guy was treated for 40 years and then have a word with yourself.

Padlocking somebody in a shed with no access to bathing and toilet facilities and forcing them to work for you meets the criteria. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/30/contents/enacted

Here’s an example: https://news.sky.com/story/man-kept-as-a-slave-for-40-years-now-enjoys-watching-football-and-old-world-cups-says-charity-12532461

And yet: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/hate-crime-england-and-wales-2021-to-2022/hate-crime-england-and-wales-2021-to-2022

The UK Government disagrees with you: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2021-uk-annual-report-on-modern-slavery/2021-uk-annual-report-on-modern-slavery-accessible-version