Lacessit

AFAIK it is climate deniers that do all the cherry picking.

It is irrelevant to compare 8000 years ago, when there were next to zero anthropomorphic emissions, with today, when there are about 8 billion humans generating them.

The literacy of your post tells me all I need to know.

I have no experience of the Philippines. I have never felt threatened or in danger in Thailand. i guess it depends what circles one moves in.

I agree; however, I only gave two because I am not a mutant.

One can state as many facts as they want, it's whether those facts are relevant to the current situation that's in question.

Breaking my age at golf every year for the next ten years.

Not even close. 95% of scientists accept the reality of global warming and climate change. It does not even need a scientist to see the trends in average air temperature, average ocean temperature, and carbon dioxide levels since the Industrial revolution. Another attempt at whataboutism.

I don't bother. I just smile.

I prefer copper sulphate. Hypochlorite works on bacteria, it is not as effective on biomass.

Easier to do it yourself, in the long run.

Tigers are just a fraction of the problem. Economic refugeeism is the big one. Pray tell, what are your scientific qualifications enabling you to judge mine? There's that word judgmental again. It's pretty simple, our air and oceans are getting warmer. Second Law of Thermodynamics. Resulting in climate change, i.e. more violent storms. Bigger bushfires, check out Australia. First Law of Thermodynamics. As less than 0.5% of the world's population has any training in the discipline of thermodynamics, much easier to shoot the messenger with dumb#ss comments. Troll someone else, O Prince of Pontification.

What's the life of a deodorant, 8 hours? You get up and mix with other people during the day, with body odor getting worse as time passes. Yuck indeed.

Hire a flamethrower.

Forests burn better when it is hot, even a child knows that. Your comment is the usual deflection.

Funny about that, many of your posts are judgmental.

Here we go again, the usual chorus of deniers. Scientifically illiterate. Can't be bothered, goodbye.

How much ginseng, Owl? I wouldn't want to get toooo horny.

IMO the problem I had in both my long term relationships in Australia was the fact both were high maintenance. I got to the stage I just could not be bothered with all the s##t I kept getting, which got worse with time. 28 years ( married ) and 16 years ( defacto ) so it's not as if I was a quitter. If I had not had the mental baggage of duty and responsibility, I probably would have ended both in a couple of months. Maybe longer with the defacto, at least she was good in bed. Both screwed me out of half my assets. About 8 years with my Thai GF now, she is not high maintenance, and does things for me a Western woman simply would not do. We would average one argument every six months, usually miscommunication or cultural differences. Done and dusted after an hour, no sulking. I walked out on both, with relief. Enjoyed freedom again.

What a horrible thought, I would sooner swallow razor blades.

Seems to me Nivea assumes everyone showers before they go to bed. AFAIK most people in Australia shower in the morning before going to work or school.

There are organic compounds in sweat. A proper test of the hypothesis would involve using antiperspirant on one armpit, and not the other, then observing if there is a difference. When I read these types of assertions that have no authoritative link or reference, I question it.

Please post a link to the research/statistics indicating anti-perspirants cause cancer. I'm not aware of any epidemic of armpit cancers, what type of cancer are they supposed to cause? What compounds in the formula are flagged as endocrine disruptors?

AFAIK aluminium salts are all colorless, it is probably organic components in the deodorant that causes a yellow coloration. I get the same effect on my shirt collars with sunblock, which does not contain aluminium.

The hypothesis aluminium is linked to dementia has been discredited quite some time ago. The most recent observations of the brains of deceased dementia patients indicate magnesium deficiency. The aluminium hypothesis arose out of sample contamination, when an aluminium microtome blade was used to prepare brain schists for spectroscopic analysis.