scorecard

Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Which is NOT relevant in terms of 'nobody is above the law' - nobody, never, including past presidents and GOD.

Hope you recover totally and quickly.

You say "... a pardoned man ...". So who is going to pardon him and on what legally sound point of law?

Sure but not desantis. Surely the GOP has much younger highly intelligent, balanced, ethical, moral offerings, with no baggage. Or do they?

He already has new blinds, all fitted.

Sounds like you're desperate for attention, sounds like you believe you're special. Good luck.

Well that was a total waste of cyber space.

I wonder why he is stating he will return. He must know: - His return means he should be arrested on sight, and any attempts by his party to stop him being detained will turn very ugly and break every item of judicial ethics and morals. Could turn into very ugly protests and do great damage to his party. - The military could quickly/easily override the police in their duties in such circumstances. - Why right now? He knows the current situation is very complex and tense and his return won't help. - Or does he perhaps believe his return, right now, will help get his daughter into the PM seat? - Does he have a strategy plan yet not evealed that he believes will shoot him into the PM seat. - I wonder if he has considered what actions/dictates/orders might come from a higher authority if he steps foot on Thai soil?

And their belief in the glory of the Thai military will keep hem together, unfortunately.

For many of the charges there was / is clear specific undistputed evidence that serious laws were broken and he was guilty, and got serious punishment and the trial was fair, and nothing to do with politics in any way . Further, there is no need nor reason for a new trial, he fact he was once a PM doesn't specifically mean he has any entitlement to a new trial.

Quote: "As to whether he should go to jail? Personally I don't think the trail that condemned him was fair. It was clearly rigged and the sentence given was illegitimate. All people are supposed to be treated equally under the law....Thaksin was clearly not, and neither was Yingluck, and she was a complete travesty of justice." I don't buy your statements, There's conclusive evidence he broke serious laws. ALos meaning it wasn't rigged and wasn't illegitimate. All ben discussed and aid out in complete detail before. Yingluck was clearly complicite in rice trading scams which were clearly proved and she now lives day by day with the fact theat several senior gov't oficials plyed serious/speciifc/personal roles in these scgeems and still doing long jail sentences. There was no 'travesty of justice', she broke serious laws which was well proven.

Not relevant comparison.

Guess this was posted by a USA person where the term 'liberal' is used to refer to left leaning. They use 'socialist/socialism' as a replacement word for communism which is prety much history.

Does 'superior' mean 'players', e.g. trump, MJT, lauren boebert, gaetz and many more...?

Read the full details.

A while back I was at the main Amphur office at Chiang Mai muang. Attendant comes in, talks over the top of the locals at the reception desk, insists that a room be prepared for his female hi-so boss, with food and special coffee. He gets ignored so he then speaks, same message in English. Young Govt tells the attendant in Thai and in English that they don't provide that type of service and the lady will have to come to the desk. I sat down with my Thai DIL (she had to get something corrected on her ID card). Thirty minutes later attendant and driver hold the office doors open and in walks the hi-so lady nad sit down. Young gov't man tells the attendant his boss will have to come to the desk to get service. Also tells the attendant "You can't move the furniture around to make an isolated area for your boss. All customers to this office are treated equally and in accordance to the published process. Hi-so woman yells and demands the gov't officer come to her. She gets ignored. Ten minutes later nothing has happened, hi-so lady and enterage sneak out.

"The family has initially planned to faciliate him and to provide him safety." How can they do that, he'll be arrested and detained on site...

It's a bit more complicated than that, do some further reading...

Plus headlines today "A potential knockout blow..." (for Khun Pita). Just more totally unsubstantiated headlines to keep this matter in the news. Boring repetitative reporting, not journalism.

Perhaps their appraoch will not rely so much on taxes.

Done. Thank you.

I decided to start a second free personal gmail account. Now not so easy, so many options and complications. And I don't want to also start domain names etc. Any hints how to nowadays start a new free basic personal gmail account much appreciated. Thanks.

Further, is the EC authorized to decide what symbolizm is OK in electioneering? And on same point is the EC authorized to decide what party policies are allowed? The real answer is NO and NO, but ...

"In the post the party pointed out this could be part two of the Illuminati case whereby the Constitutional Court cleared the dissolved Future Forward Party of a sedition charge over alleged link to an upside-down triangle logo that is supposed to be the symbol of the Illuminati." As clear as a bell? NO, not clear. Come on Move Forward, don't give anybody any reason to query or suspect anything.