Bday Prang

"Some women" allegedly saying they they prefer it is not a reason to force it on a kid

I have heard of mastectomies being recommended following the identification of a rogue gene but that is totally not the same

But its not medical reasons is it other wise all would be encouraged to do it and that is not the case is it?

I could never be with a woman who could not accept and love my foreskin

And how many of these are removed "ritually"

I'm not telling them what to do , I am questioning what they should be allowed to do. and yes I am happy with my carcinogenic bacteria containing excess skin, I'm more worried about my prostate at my age, although I doubt there's a free initiative for that in Nong Pru If science was so sure and so concerned why have the male population not received advice ? When is national circumcision day ? Or is it a secret kept between the "enlightened" cut community

Any such procedure should always be undertaken in a medical environment certainly not in a local mosque or synagogue that's for sure

Banning it for grown men, could, just about, maybe, possibly, be considered religious intolerance in the crazy world we now live in . Banning it for babies is completely different and totally right. Allowing it to continue is just plain wrong, they are not allowed to do it to girls anymore, and nobody argues about that, So in these days of equality why are they still allowed to do this to boys. Times are changing , jesus we are living in a world where rightly or wrongly there are now, many, what used to be everyday words that if spoken aloud could either put you in prison or start a riot some cartoons have provoked extreme responses. people get offended over nothing, and others lose their jobs and careers sometimes just for telling the truth. Many things are getting "banned" day in day out because a minority feels "offence" Why on earth is this male genital mutilation allowed on babies of any faith , colour, or creed , ? Why have these children not been identified as "Vulnerable" (god I hate that word) everybody else seems to have been. Is no one looking out for them, In years to come they will look back in shame on this, Discussions like this are how it starts

The generation of Americans you refer to were also snipped due to religious reasons in many cases , It was alleged to discourage masturbation, that obviously has its roots in religion, Quakers, Puritans etc it wasn't only a cleanliness issue that was just another excuse the god botherers came up with to validate their real reason

Very well put, and lets not forget that the arrogance of some of these unelected civil servants leads them to follow their own woke agendas and not necessarily follow the official narrative of the governments they are supposed to represent. That happened with some UK civil servants recently and when they were called out they started crying and said they were being bullied forcing the resignation of a government minister. Thankfully the UK appears not to have been involved in this unwarranted intrusion into the affairs of an independent sovereign nation. The Eu was mentioned extensively in the OP , are the diplomats representing their elected leaders and their electorates or as I suspect the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels?

You are probably right, but its not the cocks its the unconsented mutilation of them that is winding me up. However enough is enough I've got stuff to do, ....after I've washed my filthy foreskin of course, and offered my apologies to the missis and any other women who I've made to feel nauseous over the past 40+ years

Women really don't care, most are ambivalent,

That's probably only because it's more difficult to do before birth

Must be true then I'm surprised a study was even considered necessary

The truth?? Look, if I had ever experienced any such anti foreskin sentiment or indeed found the possession of my foreskin in anyway a hindrance to sexual encounters with women I would have had it removed years ago But that has never been the case and I have never heard of anybody else ever who has felt the need to do so. If you are happy with being "less than complete" and it works for you that's fine but it does not give you the right to advocate the "procedure" being inflicted on non consenting children Am I right or wrong ?

Unlike all circumcised men presumably ? did your mother tell you that too ? you appear to be getting desperate, are you beginning to have doubts due to the overwhelming opinions of others? That's only to be expected

Do you pay less, being circumcised ? You'll be telling us you get it for free next lol

women don't have a foreskin

Keep on kidding yourself Its up to you but please don't try and convince the rest of us! If wanted to try it I could but you can never go back

Ok I'm convinced, I'll book myself in tomorrow........NOT the link to an article of pure fiction regardless of who wrote it If it really was a doctor he should be struck off. But if it makes you feel better.thats fine.

Open your mind to the fact that you have been the victim of unnecessary genital mutilation without consent. You appear to be in denial, therapy is available

No I am not. Neither are the "nongprue officials" who instigated this abomination, but what has that got to do with anything ? Do you think that most surgeons are circumcised due to there inherent knowledge,? I don't even think they use real surgeons to carry out the procedure, certainly not for the females.

And just how prevalent is penile cancer?, a lot less common than prostate cancer I would think ? Would you advocate the removal of that "non essential " body part ??

That is not true, and you know it deep down inside. Is that what your parents told you when you asked them why ?

I hardly think people need brainwashing to accept their natural unmutilated bodies although religious brainwashing is the fundamental reason for this (and many other atrocities), You certainly seem to have been brainwashed regarding your views on personal hygiene I think its called body dysmorphia and treatment (psychological) is available if you didn't know Ask yourself this, Why is any religion forced on all people from a very young age? could it possibly be that young minds are more easily corrupted ? Would it not be much more difficult to get a fully grown adult to believe any of these fairy stories ? "Backed by women" WTF ! I have NEVER encountered a woman who endorsed this practice "Safer as a baby" is that because they don't struggle in resistance as they don't know what about to happen? do they even allow the use of anaesthesia ? " Backed by science" if that was the case it would be highly recommended, or even compulsory for all, the matter would not be up for constructive debate, a bit like Covid vaccines and global warming "highly emotional" ? really? I think any right minded person would consider the surgical disfigurement of childrens genitals to be a somewhat emotive subject, at least they should do