Dan O

Off topic again. Try to keep up or stop posting on this thread and start your own with a different topic

This thread is about trump and his issue in court and not about what any other president in either party did. Nice try at gaslighting the topic

You need to put on your mister wizard hat if you categorize this a lawfare considering the directions Trump has issue to the doj to go after fbi agents, lawyers and law firms that may have worked on his cases in the past Kinda hard to claim liberal judges when Trump appointed some of them that have ruled against him. You really need to brush up on facts before you weigh in

You apparent didn't read the article you quoted or don't understand it. Thats a start. The country is already in turmoil and confusion on why Trump would.need to use the Alien Act to deport known illegals. If they are illegal and have the due process afforded by the court system then its legal and a done deal. To play legal twister when its not necessary speak to trumps power grab and project 2025 game plan As for this ruling, if it gets kicked up on appeal an over ruled then its a legal act, if not then its illegal act. Not sure why your panties are in a bunch if your so confident then time will tell. Until then, Trump hit a set back on deportation under his plan.

I doubt that and if so you're not very knowledgeable about the different levels of the judiciary system and what is allowed to be filed and the weight of the judges rulings did that degree come from Shopee or Lazada?

Thats the most moronic explanation and so off base it doesnt warrant any further rebuttal. Go try it on a different thread. Oh and renew your Google law degree. Who classified this as foreign policy?

The only "bleeding hearts" I've seen on this forum are the trump cultists that refuse to believe facts about what how Trump is conducting himself. He doesn't need to backdoor everything or burn everything to the ground, just follow a normal legal path and go after your goals with a little planning

Seems the low level judge can. Sure it will get an appeal by trumps lawyers but if the language is as clear as it appears the appeals may be hard pressed to decide otherwise. As for why "those people can file a lawsuit" well its because they feel he's broken the law in some fashion, phrase it any way you want. Thats why we have a legal system, think about it

How do you know what anyone said in the past about any presidents policies. That just illustrate your failure to think and have coherent debate with anyone. The topic is Trump not anyone else so stay on topic or go back to the basement

Only thing stupid is your analysis.. What you will find out is this issue isn't completely foreign policy and may not be at all. The Judiciary is an equal power to the president and has the constitution to uphold.

Not sure about the "such excitment". It seems your easily stimulated not me. I just posted a article. Judges are doing their job that they were put on the bunch to do. They follow the law and precedent. Trump is trying to do anything he can by a backdoor route as he feels even if he loses nothing happens to him since he's president. He can accomplish the same goals by following the normal legal path. It will be slower but he needs to realise he is not a king nor does he hold the power over the country that his idols putin, Kim, Xi.

See this is the problem with you cultist and why you are so sad and mislead. You try to twist everything posted about trump you don't like as a claim that the poster encourages and approves of whatever the issue is. WRONG

Seems trump got a set back in his deportation plans. Extraction from the Miami Herald article below: A federal judge in Texas ruled on Thursday that the Trump administration cannot use an 18th Century law — meant to be deployed against members of a hostile foreign nation during a declared war or military invasion — as a basis to deport undocumented immigrants in the U.S. who supposedly belong to a violent Venezuelan gang known as Tren de Aragua. The judge’s ruling permanently prohibits the Department of Homeland Security from removing immigrants detained under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act in the Southern District of Texas, which includes Houston. His decision represents a major setback for the Trump administration’s effort to deport suspected members of the Venezuelan gang under the archaic law to a notorious mega prison in El Salvador. U.S. District Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr. found that the “plain ordinary meaning” of the act’s language, like “invasion” and “predatory incursion” by “military forces,” does not jibe with President Donald Trump’s claims about the activities of Tren de Aragua in a March 14 proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act. Trump declared that gang members must be booted out of the country because they were “conducting irregular warfare” against the United States at the direction of Venezuela’s leader, Nicolas Maduro.

Nope its different. Seems Zelensky got a lot of what he wanted in the deal. trump will declare it was all him but thats highly questionable. Here's the breakdown from the internet: The mineral deal signed yesterday between the U.S. and Ukraine establishes the United States-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund, which allows the U.S. to invest in Ukraine’s mineral resources and natural assets2. Unlike the earlier agreements, this deal ensures joint management and co-ownership of the fund, with neither side holding a dominant vote. Additionally, 50% of all revenue from new Ukrainian oil, gas, and mineral licenses will go toward the fund. Another key difference is that this agreement is framed as a long-term strategic alignment rather than a security guarantee. The previous proposals included language requiring Ukraine to reimburse the U.S. for wartime military assistance, but that provision was removed in this final version3.

Headline doesn't match the story

well since trump would love to send convicted US citizens there as a convicted felon maybe he should get in line and show how its done.

Nice deflection

Can you show us where you got your information about phony numbers. A link would be helpful.

Thats the sound a defeated trumpette makes when they have no other defense against facts and truth

It wasn't just a result of reduced spending. As for the reduced spending , that didn't happen in a vacuum did it? There was a major contributor to cause reduced spending. Perhaps your google degree in economics has lapsed

Nice try at deflecting. I said the major issues started in 2014 but yes things were going on with Russia well before that, and not just there but in a number of regions. If you want we can go back to before 1991 when Ukraine was split off of SSR. I was addressing your comments you and Frank posted claiming I thought it all started in 2022.

Hahaha old claims and misleading statement. The donbas issue go back to before 2014 but escalated then because russia was supporting the separatist to fight in Ukraine. Nothing wrong with them wanting more protection given that russia invaded Crimea and was signalling more land grabs coming. The peace talks were a joke and would not have changed anything

You need to check your statements for truth and not project you ignorance to blame others. The major problems and conflict in donbas started around 2014 with Russian back separatists fighting against Ukraine. It continued off and on before the 2022 invasion. That was not the catalyst for the invasion by any means. There are others reason for Russian invasion that had nothing to do with anything other than Russia seeing an opportunity to take more land over

How did he have a choice to avoid Russia invading his country?

Tell that to russia