Dan O

Is it a shallow country or just you have a shallow character

He must have seen you in your ultra expensive gym suit and your fake rolex and given you a haircut to match the life you lead. Excellent outcome I think. And look you've now had another experience to post on-line how tragic your life is.

I agree 1000 %. The last 15 years of working was in Private Senior Living Facilities in the USA so I have seen first hand what goes on their, both in private facilities, state nursing homes and also with families unable to have time or money to help give care correctly. Add on the dementia aspect and it compounds the care needed exponentially

My reply was to OP on how to get him there. I was not part of or addressing any discussion other than that.

Well, I hope trump and musk can get the security forces that protect and guard the nuclear weaponry facilities back to work since they fired them last week.

I am not surprised A, that your back as you never really left is my guess. B, you start off with a ridiculous story filled with imaginary wealth references. So not much has changed

There are private courier companies that transport pretty much anything of value. For the fee they dont care. You can also contact any number of medical transport companies that fly injured customers and they can probably also assist. He absolutely should not fly alone for any reason

what are you on about? I think the answer was to your question and was adequate. Having a bad day are you?

No it the bank regs that are changing and the agents see the writing on the wall that banks will not be able to hide those illegal activities so cant support them as in the past. Im sure some will continue but it will become harder and harder as time goes on if the regs are enacted as outlined. Its been slowly change already for the past year.

I dont think your statement is completely accurate about being forced by western countries. These changes are for the reasons stated in the article primarily to help shut down mule accounts for scamming and money laundering. Long overdue. Certainly, there is the integration to comply with international banking, but they have had no real issues moving money internationally using their past regulations even with the differences that exist. They certainly have had issues with odd and indifferent support for people obviously scammed or losing money illicitly from accounts. That needs equally important revisions as part of this effort. I find it interesting that agents are now starting to back away from opening bank accounts when tourist cant properly do it on their own.. These changes most likely will start to impact agencies from faking the monetary requirements for customers to get Imm stamps without the proper finances actually in the bank.

The 3rd week in january there started to changed and canceled flights back to the USA and it took me an extra week to get a flight out of Thailand and into the USA. I didn't say they locked down Thailand but should have been clearer. Other countries were already reacting The US only allowed 1 airport in Seattle Washington as the point of arrival which coincidently is really the first city for the covid to break out in.

Changed your position now I see. Nice one

I'm not disputing where tge virus came from or if natural or lab origin. I also am not debating the beginning but no one has tge conepkete picture on that as the symptoms for many are similar to the flu. I was in thailand when the lock down started there in early January. I never claimed to be an expert in virology or anything else just a career in the medical industry so your comparisons are just your fluff to try to make an off base point. The test is not garbage as you say although the application of how it was handled was which is what I was speaking too. You imply there was no corona virus which is absolutely false so your credibility took a huge hit and doesn't exist any longer from my perspective You have a great day

You cant argue with people that believe their own lies.

Your Google physician's license has expired. You mix information from different areas to support a flash agenda, that is quite misleading as you taking parts of 1 health function and trying to mix it with a different body function and medical process and you have no clue what your saying. The only made up thing here is this misleading and unsupported bs. Here images of the actual virus not one found in a computer. I guess you'll thing this was made up. Sad https://www.sciencealert.com/this-is-what-the-covid-19-virus-looks-like-under-electron-microscopes. Don't reply because your posts are untruth and not factual and it is a waste of time to try to explain this topic to you. Have a great life

Your deflecting and trying to parse words to support your inaccurate agenda. Pathetic By your logic if you never tested for cancer it wouldn't exist. That's bs and that's all you post. The RT PCR test developed in the 1970's and dramatically improved in the 1980's. It was Intended as a monitoring test to identify people that had been exposed to a virus, in this case covid, so isolation or proactive protection could be put in place to slow and contain the spread of a virus that showed a high degree of causing death, especially in the elderly or medically compromised. If you tested positive you had been in contact with the covid virus, simple as that. The cycle rates used could indicate a low, medium or high level of virus in the body but could not predict if you would become ill or not, or whether or not the levels would increase or not or if you would be contagious or even show any signs of illness. The one confusion came with the level of cycle rate or replication to amplify the sample that was selected by different countries and test manufacturers as tge "standard". If a positive showed up at a low cycle rate of say 5 to 10 that indicated you had a higher level of virus in your system. If a high cycle rate of say 20 to 25, and showed positive indicating you had low levels in you system but you were still exposed. Above around 25 cycles the amount within your system would be extremely low but again no way to predict how your body would handle the expose. The test could not tell you if your immune system could handle and control the virus replication in your system but as for accuracy it was very good. How different governments used the information or set the cycle rates is a separate issue and certaining leads to questions on consistency but every country had their own reasons and reaction to try to contain or prevent outbreaks, which has nothing to do with the test itself. Do some real research before you make false claims and post misleading Information.

You are way off base and promoting conspiracy of more than one aspect of this scenario and have lost credibility with misleading and false information your posting. The development of RT PCR was well before his death and the beginning of covid. The test was not created for covid but modified like many tests are to detect covid as it can be for many othe virus or infections so you are actually not correct. The beginning of "covid" has not been confirm conclusively as to when it started, except in the world if conspiracies. There are reports of lab worker showing illness similar to the symptoms of covid in Nov but not being reported properly while the main outbreak was in Jan 2020. The interview comments you used were also disconnected and had nothing to do with covid and comments have been extracted or cherry picked to imply your agenda of conspiracy. That interview and discussion was about HIV. I worked for 25 years in the industry so have some knowledge base to rely on and not just half truths and conspiracy.

It was longer than a few months and your phrasing or understanding of his discussion about it being used diagnostically is not accurate and being taken out of the context of the interview and discussion. The PCR RT was meant to identify exposure to what is being test for, but not for determining level of contagion or if the patient exposure would continue to grow or if you would show signs of illness or if there would be an increase or decrease, only whether you had exposure to what you are tested for.

No did not.. I write about the reasoning behind the test and it is a valid test for what it was intended for. To try to claim i agree it was a bad or fake test or gave fake results in any way is not what I said but that was a nice try to gaslight what I wrote. You almost made it but you can try again after you research and make yourself knowledgeable or I can school you on it but then you might look foolish

you have apparently no knowledge or understanding of what the PCR RT tests was, how it was used or what the results meant. The information surrounding it's use as a identification test was unclear and poorly described but it actually did what it was intended to do. It was intended as a monitoring test to conform if you had been exposed to the virus, not whether you were sick or had symptoms. Unfortunately the consistency of cycle rate meaning how many times the test was run to amplify the virus content in the sample was inconsistent company to company and country to country. The intent of the test was to be able to identify those exposed so you could take precautionary action to help curtail the spread.

Yes I caught covid (comfirm) 3 times and lost family members as well. People can debate if it came from the lab or nature all day long and that's fine. People can debate the measures taken for protection were too much or not enough. People can question why the confusing information. All valid but to claim it did not exist is a lie

That's utter nonsense and ridiculous to post misleading information like this.

Much like your comments

most polls are fairly accurate depending on the topic or questions selected to poll on. But I did expect you to make an excuse.

Its a nothing burger at this point as Biden isn't president any longer nor are we leading up to an election. The overall view isn't a favorable one when you look at how unpopular Trump was for such a long time compared to favorable he was.