James105

No need to cry. It's just 2 guys having a conversation that share similar political views. Harris can have a chat with one of the (many) leftist outfits that will have a similar conversation with her that share her political views.

The people cheering on this tyranny seem to think they are safe from this as they are on the "right side" of it. They are not. It's only the elites that are protected under tyrannical regimes and they would do well to remember that. "A man who falsely claimed on a live-streamed TikTok video that he was “running for his life” from rioters in Derby has been jailed. Dimitrie Stoica had been livestreaming to 700 followers as he walked around Derby on Wednesday 7 August – the same evening that potential protests and disorder had been feared might take place in the city." https://www.derbyshire.police.uk/news/derbyshire/news/news/south/2024/august/man-jailed-after-fake-claim-on-tiktok-video-that-he-was-running-for-his-life-from-rioters/

There is a large enough contingent of the white population who think the only people who can be racist are white people, which is obviously ridiculous, but that is how it happens.

Well Yousaf is a racist, so I am not surprised you are not surprised that I think so.

He called Yousaf a racist, which is an entirely accurate description. Musk also clarified in the second part that: "Legal discovery will show that however big a racist he’s been in public communications, he is vastly worse in private communications." Yousaf clearly has been an even bigger racist in his private communications on X (that Musk will have access to) than he is in public. Musk is not racist and if you are claiming he is then back it up with evidence.

The reason that the imaginary monsters were not in the street is that they are imaginary. The gullible left fell for fake posts on telegram that were written exactly like the left wing middle class think that working class people would speak like. It seems you fell for it too. Bless.

Well, the fact that there was no "far right" on the street, only muslim thugs armed with weapons damaging property and intimidating BBC and Sky news reporters should be evidence enough, but since you ask... https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/aug/07/thousands-of-anti-racism-protesters-take-to-streets-to-counter-far-right-rallies " Earlier Earlier Nick Lowles, a long standing expert on the British far right, and who now leads Hope Not Hate, told the Guardian that he was sceptical there would be widespread trouble on Wednesday evening. The expectation was triggered by a list of targets found on social media. Lowles, speaking before this evening said: “I think it’s a hoax, designed to spread fear and panic. “The list has been compiled by one man in Liverpool, who simply googled immigration law firms etc." Only the really gullible fell for it though, so it could have been worse.

You seem to have posted an article about the "far right" hoax by left wing agitators that the gullible media fell for. There was no "far right" on the streets that evening, but there was plenty of violent muslim thugs armed with weapons out on the streets. There is plenty of evidence for that if you would like to see it. The BBC and Sky accidentally recorded it too. Like I said, the problem with imaginary monsters is that they are really hard to find.

So now they are just "right wing" thugs? Seem to be changing your tune. Is that because despite frantically searching for evidence of far right and nazi saluters you can only find pro hamas protestors doing so? Oh dear. The trouble with imaginary monsters is that they are really hard to find.

1. Tyranny always starts with the pretense of "security" and your "safety" and then escalates from there. 2. Just saying what I am seeing. 3. There are more then tens of thousands of people in the UK. There is no "far right", hence the reason no "far right" turned up to the supposed 100 organized riots by the "far right" which was a hoax (misinformation if you will) by the "far left". "Far right" just a divisive term used by the tyrant to cause division and justify his tyrannical actions. He won't even define what he considers to be "far right" as to do so in the context of the recent rioting would mean describing them as disaffected working class white people who get angry when little girls get murdered, not the swastika tattooed thugs that spring to mind when that term is used. Whatever the white people did on the streets it pales into insignificance when compared to what the 2nd generation immigrant did to those girls.

The PM is a tyrant e.g 1. The use of police to create a visible threat to any dissent and show trials for dissenters. 2. The use of surveillance to create paranoia 3. Social fragmentation of the population and pitting groups against each other using the imaginary "far right". He is ticking all the tyrannical boxes and he knows his government is built on a house of cards with only 20% share of the electoral vote. I think the UK is on a very dark path.

Can you give me an example of something you think she has said that is transphobic?

Doesn't really need a crystal ball does it? Labour in charge: 1. Remove any kind of deterrent. 2. Have a reputation from the criminal people smugglers as "the friendly man". 3. Appoint a home secretary that advertises on social media that "refugees are welcome". 4. Literally do nothing other rename border force to border control or whatever. 5. Grant 100,000 illegal immigrants asylum (or in Labour terminology - process 100,000 claims). If people are allowed a free vote in 5 years time I imagine more people will make the effort to vote for anyone but this tyrannical Labour regime, especially the ones who didn't vote this time as they didn't think it would make any difference whether it was Tory or Labour.

Well, for starters there hasn't yet been a genocidal civil war in Britain (yet), so there is that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_genocide

...long enough to make an impact. The 2 illegal immigrant deaths are Labour's responsibility now. Had Reform been in power there would be 2 less dead people in the channel as they would have made an impact on this.

He doesn't want them to learn "critical thinking". He literally wants them to be indoctrinated with group think. Remember the teacher that actually taught critical thinking in a lesson? He was fired for it: https://scnr.com/article/teacher-from-viral-jk-rowling-critical-thinking-video-fired-from-college_a91f8d69117011ef9c930242ac1c0002

Your links are just opinion pieces spreading the same misinformation you are doing. "Angry fathers rioting after 3 little innocent girls were brutally murdered pushed them over the edge after decades of police inaction from certain 'communities' raping and killing children" is probably a headline closer to the truth but doesn't suit the current narrative really does it?

So 2 out of the hundreds arrested were doing nazi salutes and 1 had a swastika tattoo (again with that same photo of the one man)? That's your evidence to tar hundreds of people with? Stop spreading misinformation if you cannot back it up, or if you don't want your "totally innocent community" to also be tarred with the same brush just because hundreds of them have been found guilty of raping children. The riots were caused by decades of appeasement and ignoring voters at every election about immigration. It wasn't one single incorrect tweet. It was pent up frustration at thousands of girls being raped, about kids being blown up at concerts and kids being stabbed every day of the week, and 3 kids being murdered when they should have been safe was a tipping point for some. People have been ignored for decades about the problems. Voting for the party that promised to fix immigration failed. Also, recent history would have shown them that if democracy fails, then rioting will get you what you want: 1. BLM riots. Got what they wanted, Starmer bent his knee to them. 2. Harehills riots. Got what they wanted, concerns addressed.

Do you have a link to back up your claim of the political motivations of those charged with rioting are actually right wing? My guess (note the use of the word guess here) would be that they are either Labour voters or non voters. But that is all it is - a guess. Their motivations were probably more aligned to simply being fathers who are scared for the future of their children if someone doesn't do something to address the actual problems caused by opening the borders to violent men who think it is normal to rape and kill women and children.

Misinformation does not cause riots and certainly not misinformation that was corrected long before the riots started, but the needless and preventable slaughter of innocent little girls makes people in deprived working class areas angry. It's no coincidence that these areas were the same areas where thousands of white girls were being raped by "asian" men with impunity for decades. "The rightwing thugs, did riot and in response to online lies they attacked a completely innocent community." More misinformation. You have zero idea what the political leanings of those involved in the rioting are, and statistically they are more likely to be Labour voters anyway as these incidents happened in deprived working class communities. It's not the kids that need educating on misinformation, it's people like you.

This is a lie. The riots were fuelled by 3 little girls being killed and many others stabbed at a Taylor Swift dance class. The details that he was a 2nd generation Rwandan immigrant were released way before people started rioting.

Not only is Humza Yousef a racist but he is a particularly stupid one. No doubt he has been even more racist in private messages on the platform of the person he wishes to sue for calling him racist, and as the owner of that platform Elon Musk will know exactly how racist he has been in not only his public statements (which are already pretty racist) but also in his deleted and private messages on there.

I was responding to someone else's whataboutery. Maybe take it up with who I was responding to.

Be afraid, be very afraid. Terrifying people.