Jump to content

Excel

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    6,099
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Excel

  1. Just now, Silencer said:

    Oh...so you have never compared an experience, law, act, food, attraction, people, event, whatever between one country and another? WOW...you are amazing!  Woo-hoo. 

    This thread is not about any type of comparisons. It is about someone killing a protected animal in a Thai national park. Perhaps you should start a separate thread on "Endangered species, their protection and penalties from around the world". if you wish to contribute relevant info on that specific subject matter.

    • Like 1
  2. 3 minutes ago, RandiRona said:

    Was he so dumb or a fortune teller told him that today is his lucky day to not worry about X ray scan?

    Send him to Zoo...he is such a specimen.

     

     

     

    Possibly to be fair to him he is so used to putting live ducks, chickens and geese into the overhead locker on his previous internal Indian flights he never gave much thought to what he shouldn't do here ????

    • Haha 1
  3. 35 minutes ago, proton said:

    It seems to me from reading these threads that they find out you are breaking the rules either by somebody informing on you, or yourself telling them, and hardly ever from them investigating you as a routine check by looking at your bank details or travel history. It is also apparent that when they do find out they can impose a fine and make you pay back over payment, that's clear from the letters posted.

    That would seem to sum it up exactly. However it would also appear to be the case that the £ 50 penalty was simply imposed because @Pumpuynarak knowingly filled the form in wrongly by his own admission and hence seems to be more of a fine for doing so. Hence of course he had to pay back that monies to which he was not entitled.  If he had actually been in the UK when he completed that form then no fine could have been levied and if he had left the UK sometime after then they, either be by somebody informing, or yourself telling them, and hardly ever from them investigating you as a routine check for which it was noted by others elsewhere,  there is no documented evidence supporting that theory.

     

    If anybody wishes to check exactly what information the DWP holds on you then you can make a request to;

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/request-your-personal-information-from-the-department-for-work-and-pensions.

    other useful info

    https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-work-pensions/about/personal-information-charter

    • Like 2
  4. 12 minutes ago, DrJoy said:

    The letter is not required if:

     

    The new passport contains the replacement information.

     

    The new passport is issued outside Thailand and is used to enter Thailand and the entry stamp is in the new passport.

    This question specifically relates to not needing a letter from the embassy, whatever that is. So assuming one leaves on the old passport which contains an extension of stay valid say until 3 months time.  Renew passport in the UK and return to Thailand, how will that new passport get the entry stamp as it has been said elsewhere that you will not receive a VE stamp (new passport has not got extension of stay in it)  if you still have a valid extension of stay, in the old passport ( assuming of course you got the re-entry permit). Or will immigration look at the old passport and see you have an extension so automatically put the entry stamp in your new passport ? Seems a bit unclear to me what they will do, perhaps @ubonjoe could clarify this please

    • Like 1
  5. 2 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

    It will unfortunately be like 2010, and 2014, all over again.  I am sure the major areas in BKK will see the sand bagged checkpoints set-up and the State of Emergency kept in place to deter political unrest and return happiness to the people.

    Well you may have a point although I fear this time it will not just be BKK nor will it be the same numbers of people involved. In 2010 it was the "Red shirts" whose numbers were only into thousands. Since then, due to the ultra corrupt policies of a junta leader/PM, he has successfully brought almost destitution to around 70% of the population. Poverty has grown significantly as statistics show.  So tell me exactly what has around 70% of the population now got to lose further by demonstrating and taking action for major change, when this utter corruption has already deprived so many of a meaningful lifestyle ?

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...