Jump to content

placeholder

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    26,567
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by placeholder

  1. We have plenty of evidence of your real position. And it's clearly hard right wing. Your silly and baiting generalizations about liberals is proof enough of that.
  2. If you actually bothered to do even a cursory investigation of Biden's income you would find that it's all been legitimately accounted for. But I guess you would rather indulge in empty speculation.
  3. Well, a deserved scolding is not the same as belittling, degrading, or demeaning. Trump may feel humiliated, but that's on him. The judge's warning to Trump was clearly legitimate. The judge is not responsible for Trump's feelings.
  4. I don't think so. He's required to face a jury of his peers, but it's not a jury until all have been selected and sworn in.
  5. "I dislike Trump and believe he acts inappropriately on occasion." "Inappropriately"? I see you're taking the gloves off. And "on occasion" to describe how frequently he behaves in such a manner? Now you've gone too far. Please dial it down a lot or some of us might question your claimed status of being a "neutral" observer.
  6. And exactly how has this judge demeaned, degraded, or belittled Trump?
  7. Of course, to accept that statement we would have to agree that you do possess such credibility.
  8. Baiting who? Donald Trump? Is he a member of aseannow.com? Can you share with us what name he is posting under?
  9. All you can offer is an empty and unproven right wing generalization in response to my specific explanation of why it has taken so long for the trial to be scheduled. It is laughable that you call yourself a "neutral" observer. In fact, the judge gave neither side what they asked for.
  10. Clearly you don't know that the reason that the trial didn't take place much earlier is that Trump's legal team kept on filing frivolous motions which were repeatedly denied but were time consuming. And the ridiculous to delay the trial for 3 years is of a piece with that.
  11. I'm pretty sure Clark Kent and Lois Lane were two members of the grand jury in Washington.
  12. Effectively state control? Buriisma had the prosecutor in its pocket. The Chinese company had a government contract? Didn't that company go bankrupt? That's your reasoning? Wasn't the CEO of this company ultimately jailed on corruption charges?
  13. Not at all. You vilified almost 4 million people based on the actions of a few. I just pointed out at the same kind of reasoning could have applied to the Irish back when.
  14. It wasn't the spending it was the tax cuts. Big tax breaks for the wealthy
  15. Just to show you how links work. In this case a link to the landing page of the World Forum where you'll find the rule I quoted. Apparently, you are either unfamiliar with that rule or don't understand it. To put it in a nutshell it means "Put up or..." Share a link that leads to a credible source that backs up your claim that "There are recordings (and public appearances) of Biden committing crimes and confessing to crimes! "
  16. Somebody else needs a reminder that this is not the Fiction Forum: Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source. https://aseannow.com/forum/158-world-news/
  17. So, were Trump to die suddenly, then he's fair game? An interesting reversal on the old saying which yields De mortis nihil nisi malum ([Speak} nothing but ill of the dead)
  18. And what percentage of the almost 4 million Muslims in the UK is that? And wasn't there was a time not long when the same thing could be said of the Irish? Did you make similar generalizations about them?
  19. Do you need me to use words of no more than 2 syllables? Here it goes A person who knows nothing about being an old person doctor tells us what he thinks is wrong with Joe Biden's health.
  20. Are you a penguin whisperer? Maybe you should give these Emperor Penguins advice and tell them be like the Adelies. Tell them to disregard their instincts and start breeding on land instead.
  21. ECU's Dr. Muhammad Rizwan Azhar led the project which identified the advantages of zinc-air batteries, including their environmental friendliness, low cost, and safety. The university's breakthrough involved using new materials like carbon and cheaper minerals to enhance the zinc-air battery's efficiency, power density, and lifespan. The redesigned zinc-air batteries, utilizing abundant resources like zinc and air, offer a reliable energy storage solution, bringing Australia closer to its sustainability goals. https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Zinc-Air-Surpasses-Lithium-In-Major-Breakthrough-In-Battery-Tech.html
  22. Sleeper cell society? Maybe you should ask yourself how paranoia works. There are almost 4 million Muslims in the UK. If they were anything like what you believe, the bombs would be going off by now en masse.
  23. Your comments have no answer for the fact that the predictions have been remarkably accurate. Nor, that no one has come up with an explanation that actually predicts as well as does the current theory.
  24. Once again, when you have no specific rebuttal, you resort to unsubstantiated allegations. You previously made a silly comment comparing scientific research to widely shared erroneous beliefs. It doesn't matter what the scientists allegedly believe. If the research rests on earlier research and comes up with results that correspond to reality, that's enough. Let the critics come up with a theory that has better predictive power. So far, they've failed.
×
×
  • Create New...