placeholder

Here is a link to the original research on which the Guardian article is based.

Thank you for your insightful and revealing critique of the article.

I think his problem stems from a phenomenon noted by Stephen Colbert: "It's a well-known fact that reality has a liberal bias."

And this is a first generation battery. The second generation battery is projected to have a range of about 200 miles. That's not much different from the range afforded by an LFP battery. And work on improving sodium batteries continues. Right now researchers are working on a sodium sulfide battery that will be more energy dense than lithium batteries.

I hope it's the case that neither of you actually read the article. Otherwise you would know that your questions were accounted for in the article.

So what course of action do you suggest they pursue?

You're the one who made the simplistic claim that Rittenhouse ' comment was anti-semitic His comment was stupid and repugnant enough without bringing anti-Semitism into it.

You think the countries from which China is stealing land or to just stand by and let it happen?

This is the youth who had illegal possession of a fireman and took it to a zone of civil unrest. He had no business being there. He was a high school dropout and a wannabe police officer.

You can construe as much as you like. But there's no hard evidence to support your contention. On the other hand, there's plenty of evidence to support the fact that Rittenhouse's thought processes are seriously defective. And you did not at all address the fact that there are plenty of right wingers out there who are fans of Jewish demagogues like Mark Levin or of Jewish lowlifes like Steven Miller.

But not pitiful like someone who offers an arbitrary judgement without reasoning to back it up.

Given that China has engaged in bullying behavior over the possession of islands with the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwon, is it surprising that these countries might prefer having America on their side?

Well, to be literal, he claimed that his prosecutors were funded by George Soros. Not sure someone like him is even knowledgeable enough to know that Soros is Jewish. And it's crazy enough without invoking anti-Semitism. I'm not denying that anti-Semitism accounts for a sizeble number of people who subscribe to Soros hatred, but not all. After all, there are loons who hate Soros but adore Mark Levin.

Treating a general condition like "life" as analogous to the functioning of a legislative is obviously ridiculous. Does anyone really have to explain to you why that's the case?

Because the care in question is primarily about the fetus/baby. They're not claiming that the care is in regards to any condition of hers except pregnancy. You definitely need to look up the meaning of "obvious".

I believe that the style of Mad Mick's post could aptly be described as Tourettian.

Why go back that far? Just look at the fiasco that was the Durham investigation. Right wingers were sure that it would bust open the machinations of the DEEP STATE against the Trump administration. It failed utterly to do that.

////Quoted post deleted//// And yet you have failed to mention this: Former Israeli prime minister rebuts claim, boosted by Russia, that the US blocked a Ukraine peace agreement: 'It's unsure there was any deal to be made' "In the interview, Bennett himself notes that it was not the US, France, or Germany that put an end to any peace talks. Rather, it was Russia slaughtering hundreds of civilians in a town outside the Ukrainian capital, a war crime discovered just about a month after the full-scale invasion began. "The Bucha massacre, once that happened, I said: 'It's over,'" Bennett recalled." https://www.businessinsider.com/israel-bennett-walks-back-claim-west-blocked-ukraine-russia-peace-deal-2023-2

Thank you for your thoughtful analysis of the legal issues facing Donald Trump. Once again, you have conclusively demonstrated that you are definitely not an oblivious cheerleader for the former President.. At least, that's the view from Opposite World.

Do you understand that the reason Zelensky could barely speak Ukrainian is because he is a native Russian speaker? Most people would understand that only further strengthens the integrity of his stance against the Russians.

In his recent speech to the nation, Putin once again characterized the Ukrainian govt as being Nazis. And you think Zelensky calling Putin "sick" is objectionable compared to that?

Except the government that owns it open bans makes it a crime to call the War in Ukraine anything but a "special military operation." On the BBC, for example, I can read reports on harsh criticisms of the government. So much so that many Conservatives in the UK revile it for being liberal. In the USA, the staff of the VOA fought a long battle against the Trump administration to keep their editorial independence. Any evidence of RT battling against the Kremlin?

Please share with us any evidence that the Russian slaughter of civilians in Bucha is anywhere close to being universally disbelieved. Once again, you need reminding of the rule posted on the landing page. " Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source." You've made some foul posts in this forum. But this one is downright vile. Bucha killings: Satellite image of bodies site contradicts Russian claims A satellite image of Bucha in Ukraine appears to show bodies lying in the street nearly two weeks before the Russians left the town. The image from 19 March, first reported by the New York Times and confirmed by the BBC, directly contradicts Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov's claim that footage of bodies in Bucha, that has emerged in recent days, was "staged" after the Russians withdrew. The satellite image shows objects that appear to be bodies in the exact locations where they were subsequently found by Ukrainian forces when they regained control of the town north of Kyiv. https://aseannow.com/forum/158-world-news/

Anyway, as cited above, in the wake of the Russian massacre of civilians in Bucha, negotiations were no longer feasible.

Are you aware that RT is owned and funded by the Russian government?