ozimoron

If you don't then don't claim it. It's against the rules. I believe that it's entirely possible to research nearly anything. Only conspiracy theories afficionados would claim it isn't.

The OP has a high degree of confidence in the ineffectiveness of ivermectin along with a zillion other studies. There's about 2 zillion studies which demonstrate the effectiveness of masks but you have cherry picked one which claims not to know. Go figure. Masks are off topic in this thread about ivermectin.

Unless a fact is proven it simply isn't a fact.

There's no conclusion as to whether masks are effective or not. "There is uncertainty about the effects of face masks".

I don't care. I stopped reading the post you replied to when he implied that CM had better supermarkets than Pattaya. I love Pattaya. First came here 40 years ago and have not lost the excitement. I live in decent, quiet accommodation for a third of what I could rent back home and have a stunning girlfriend. Life's good.

We aren't interested in facts. It's against the rules to make a factual claim and only produce IMO as evidence.

The OP is facts. Perhaps try producing a link so we can fact check your anti vax claims? It's mandatory if you want to comment here.

Anybody who can point to reliable evidence. Usually qualified people and evidence produced by qualified people. In general it will be reproducible experiments and the like. Peer reviewed science.

Avoid salt and you will still be eating too much of it.

No hospital in Bangkok gave you ivermectin.

There was anecdotal evidence that vaccinations saved all their lives or at least didn't let them get very ill and hospitalised. Why do you reject that anecdotal evidence?

Giving a fraudster money doesn't make it legal. It's still fraud. I'm not suggesting that this case is fraud. That's up to the court to decide.

Fact checkers check fact checkers. Fact checkers can always be contested and in the end facts aren't facts until they are proven.

That's a great example fo fact checking. I would change my mind on every one of those notions.

Me too. Why are Thais unlikely to heed medical advice?

Nobody takes scientific advice to limit salt? Seriously?

Do you believe that LBGTQ is a perversion? Define perversion within the parameters of your usage of the word.

That is always a feature of fact checking. To be credible it must be supported.

Widely accepted and not credibly contested.

The point of my question was what if your opinion was contested and fact checking provided in support of that dissent?

Do you think he should have made that footage public for all news outlets? Was he entitled to decide which ones to give it to?

How likely are you to change your opinion on any matter when you see reasonably argued and credible fact checking indicating that your preconception was false?

Mike Lindell says he will sue Kevin McCarthy for sharing J6 footage with Fox News https://www.rawstory.com/mike-lindell-says-he-will-sue-kevin-mccarthy-for-sharing-j6-footage-with-fox-news/

In other news, another far right wing head explodes in outrage.

It just tells me they are drunk or not very good at picking the difference in gender. I never suggested there was any stigma, just being pedantic about what "straight" means in relation to sex.