ozimoron

What part of the entitled twit got her marching orders with a palace apology specifically citing racism are the forelock tuggers not getting here?

Yes, the well mannered Fulani offered her an off ramp but she was too dimwitted to take it and instead continued her racist attack.

Yes it was.

Is that relevant?

She didn't, try to stick to her actual words.

No, it depends on whether he could be fired or the public is stuck with him.

It seems public opinion is no doubt about her comments being racist but the usual suspects are rushing out here in denial.

The palace admitted it was racist.

Just like the racism against Markle?

Please go away and come back when you can learn to quote correctly, instead of incorrectly paraphrasing. She meant what she said.

Right, but she didn't ask about heritage, did she?

Racism was never in date.

Sadly we live in an age where people still think racism is acceptable.

It probably won't help but try clearing the cache and force stop / restart. https://appuals.com/facebook-messenger-not-showing-messages/

word of the day: recalcitrant.

Roger Stone is probably in focus now due to his close association with both Trump and the Oath Keepers at the time. I'm not sure but I think those convicted still get a chance to cooperate further in exchange for a lighter sentence.

It seems from anecdotal evidence here is that the most common policy is to not allow delivery drivers to enter the building unaccompanied. I can't see this changing so I think it's probably better dropped, you're flogging a dead horse at this point and getting a bit uncivil to boot.

Please, he used the word "forced" in capital letters.

Is it better than Twitter? You'll have to decide that for yourself, of course, but advocates say there are two major benefits over Twitter - a timeline that isn't reordered by algorithms like on Twitter and a decentralised network that isn't controlled by one company. "Your home feed should be filled with what matters to you most, not what a corporation thinks you should see," reads the mission statement on the Mastodon page. https://www.rawstory.com/from-tweeting-to-tooting-the-switch-from-twitter-to-mastodon/

Farangs is not a word.

Apple, like every public company in America, has a constitution. That constitution always says that its directors are required to protect the company's shareholder value. This is why they banned Twitter and why 50% of advertisers have recently boycotted Twitter.

Apple was quite clear about why they banned Twitter, covid misinformation.

Because truth doesn't matter to you?

I understand perfectly. I'm asking you where you stand on that issue. Now I know.

So, it isn't about truth seeking? Whatever the outcome you support free speech even when it's proved to be misinformation on public health issues?