If their policy change negatively affects joint accounts, and they don’t care, then what are we to think?
"...what are we to think?"
How about thinking that the bank's explanation that it is related to security is actually a good thing? To assume that they do not want joint accounts does not make any sense, why would the bank frown on joint accounts?
So you can have a joint account but can't both access it from different phones via their app.
So they don't want joint accounts.
Anyway, that was my logic.
That's right. You read it how you want to but, logically, though, it does not mean that BBL does not want joint accounts.
Silly post.
I prefer a normal jury that takes the jury instructions seriously and reaches a verdict based on the evidence provided.
It was less silly than yours! You'd prefer a jury with no (to use your inappropriately denigrating tone) "Maga" contingent?
You have a fully operational retail, current account in your name with BBL London and all the usual banking facilities, which is what the OP is asking about? Or do you mean that when you transfer from HSBC they use BBL London for the transfer?
Changing a battery does not require a "skilled watch smith", even for a decent watch. If it's a waterproof watch that you need re-sealing after opening, that's a different question.
How long do you hang around doing your surveys or do you just walk past the counters and not see anyone there for the five seconds it takes you to pass? If 90% of it didn't sell, it wouldn't be stocked.
You should have checked to see whether it was imported before being shocked by £6.76 if you're that concerned about a few baht for a non-Thai food item! Foie gras is a bit pricey per portion here also.