Liverpool Lou

Well reports of top secret documents being recovered. ...with no details of what the documents are, or what they contain.

Look at the thread title. We all know he hasn't been charged yet. I can read and I've seen the title, thanks. Some posters clearly don't know that he's not been charged.

There's an awful lot of evidence that's out in the public domain. The endless lying, the Mueller investigation evidence (which certainly did not exonerate Trump of wrongdoing), the January 6th committee evidence, tax and banking records in New York, Georgia election officials sworn testimony and recorded phone calls documenting Trump's behavior, the "top secret" documents seized during the execution of the search warrant at Mar-al-Lago. There's a clear pattern of conduct, more than enough evidence to draw conclusions about his character and integrity. And absolutely nothing that has led to any criminal charges. "The endless lying, the Mueller investigation evidence (which certainly did not exonerate Trump of wrongdoing), the January 6th committee evidence" What? Sarcasm, yes?

You wish. How do you know? Have you seen the retrieved documents? Have you? Have you seen anything that suggests that they have anything? Have you heard any reports of charges being made?

Didn't claim trump has been charged You said "if found guilty, hopefully the maximum sentence will be applied", clearly suggesting that you thought that he had been charged with something. A person who faces no charges cannot be found guilty.

So it's ok for him to say it and sweep up a crowd, but when people on here say the same, in a clear reference to his words, you're calling them out. Biased much? No, I'm not "calling them out", I'm just pointing out that he has not been charged with anything. "Biased much?" Hypocritical "much"? By "biased" I suppose you mean that I have an opinion that may not match yours, yes? I'm an individual and I do not have to be "unbiased", just as you, clearly, are not. Perhaps you're doing a "Thaivisa" and suggesting that I shouldn't be biased but it's ok for you to be?

"Of the 30,000 emails that the FBI examined..." In addition to those emails, the other 31,830 that she deemed "personal" that she deleted so they could not be examined by the authorities should not be forgotten.

Why?

Did'nt the same clown want to lock Hillary up without charge? No. That was a Presidential campaign "chant"; he, obviously, was in no position to lock up anyone.

Amazing how many keyboarders thought the FBI search would come up empty. Amazing how so many keyboard-bashers don't realise that. so far, it hasn't come up with anything much.

Amazing how some keyboard-bashers think that Trump has been charged with something!

He hasn't been charged with anything, never mind espionage.

Can't lock up someone who hasn't been charged with anything!

What's he been charged with? Oh, yes...nothing!

"...avoidable disasters continue to happen on a regular basis..." Nonsense. These incidents are not happening "on a regular basis". The last one was over 13 years ago and it was started by the use of pyrotechnics in the club.

Perhaps they've chosen not to use a dodgy lawyer?

the POA states (rough translation from google translate) that the seller (Australian Father) has the same power as the owner (Thai national -daughter) on the said chanote with the correct address and the building that occupies the land and that any act that the father performs about the land or house would be the same as if if it had been done by herself. So you have the answer to your question!

"Why Do Australians Come Long-time to Places Like Thailand?" Too many Australians in Australia, perhaps?

Sort of depends on what the PoA states!

As stated in the OP, Charlie, "Owner on Chanote is Seller’s daughter , Thai National". Why are some quotes, such as that above, automatically bolded by the forum when copy and pasted? The bolding isn't mine!

if he was insured ????!!!!! RTP force will have insurance coverage (but also access to compensation funds in the event that it didn't have insurance) that's who I was talking about, not the officer who was riding the bike.

She said "yes" anyway, then ran inside her home.

I feel sorry for the lad if he wanted to go with his school friends, more people don't have any problems on Thai roads than do. "...safety is a joke here inside school..." You won't let him go on a statistically safe school trip yet you still allow him to attend that "unsafe" school every day? I can't understand that kind of logic.

"...everything had been normal, she had been doing activities with school friends. Friends and teachers said that B was a lively young lady with no apparent stress problems or issues that anyone was aware of".

Very sad incident, but I wonder why was CPR performed on her if she was breathing and, presumably, had a pulse?