Liverpool Lou

I know, it's like saying "Carribbean British passport holder". ...or African American?

We rode Triumphs, not those fairy Nortons and BSAs.

Being Français?

"...a bunch of lazy sods". The RTP operate in a similar fashion to the "lazy sods" in your country where they also react to and rely on complaints from the public and don't do everything off their own bats in may cases, they cannot be everywhere.

What "scam" are you suggesting THAI is involved in...early debt rehabilitation, that's a scam?

Every airline in the world was not grounded entirely in 2021.

No reason that Thailand would do that.

if that is so i can call the police if i see someone smoking in public area of hotel? You sure could...if you think it's worth the bother.

Absolutely agree, same thing happened to me at The Old English a couple of weeks ago, weed smoke drifting in from an English t_wat on the outside terrace.

It is now I am missing the laughing emojis ????

You mean ridiculously good policy. No, I do not.

Sure do. https://www.takimag.com/article/dinner-bell-for-the-rights-last-supper/ You sure don't if that's your evidence! Did you read your own link, by any chance?

There already is.

Negligence, yes, but not murder.

That is so ridiculous.

So that's your response? My country is absolutely none of your business Yes, that was my response and it still is. You're right, of course, that, on the face of it, your nationality is none of my business but, when you are fatuously accusing another country's nationals of being responsible for any of their government's actions, it becomes a not unreasonable question in a discussion in order to establish which actions made by your government you have also to be held responsible for by your own logic. Judging by your defensive response, I'm guessing that your own government isn't exactly squeaky clean and for you to disclose which one it is would f'ck up your "Russian" theory.

Nonsense.... insurance companies accept premiums and do a very poor job of telling you in advance what is not covered, if they bother at all. Make a claim, then you find out how good or bad your policy is. they will retroactively pursue your medical records (withholding any payment) looking for a weasel opportunity. Policies can be modified in mid term. Take your agenda elsewhere. To quote your words, take your agenda elsewhere, I do not have an agenda. Every regulated insurer has to specify what their policies do and do not cover and they do so in the policy that every policy-holder is supplied with. Anyone who starts a policy without knowing what is covered is an idiot who just needs to ask the insurer or the broker before paying any premiums. Of course insurers check the policy holder's medical records before paying a related claim, that's to establish that the claim is covered by the policy and valid. Why would any rational person deny them that right? Insurance companies are not obligated to pay claims for conditions that are not covered and checking out that is not "weaseling" neither is it withholding payment unreasonably. Which insurance policy provisions have you had altered mid contract to your detriment?

Yes, it was but there's no need to be so critical of yourself.

The OP answers your question.

Isn't the ominous "B5,000 plus B2,000 per day" warning only if the person is arrested with the missed 90-day report? Last time I missed ( and that was a whole 90 days) I just got the usual B2,000 fine at Immigration when I did the next one and a stamp in the passport and a smile.

Probably every business uses cheques, as do banks. These were cashiers cheques/bank drafts which are, effectively, cash, but regardless of that cheques can be signed over to third parties, they're not all crossed "a/c payee only".

She has been charged with theft from the bank, not for "ripping-off customers" notes LL.

Ok, which country are you from, then? Let's see what actions you are responsible for using your own logic.

Reason might be something to do with 110 of the corrupt buggers just being arrested for corruption The other approximately 229,890 officers (99.95%) haven't been so what's so rational about bashing the police in general?