Liverpool Lou

That is 100% false.

It depends on whether your item is selected for examination, not the CO's mood, they cannot physically check every delivery into the country. As the venerable CharlieH wrote, "it's the luck of the draw".

It is an official figure... https://www.customs.go.th/list_strc_simple_neted.php?ini_content=individual_160503_03_160922_01&lang=en&left_menu=menu_individual_submenu_01_160421_02 Thai Customs estimate of the value is based on CIF, cost insurance and freight charges. The purchase price shown on a receipt is not necessarily the value it would not normally include Thai import duty (if any) or Thai VAT.

Your comment does not make a lot of sense, the girls are ages 12-14. "...for the most part are not menustrating..." What does "menustrating" [sic] mean, is that an indication of your grasp of the subject?

Yes, if it had been part of the Governor's election manifesto.

Perhaps those in the media and others would not have given their opinion about the case (that has since turned out to be wrong) if the authorities had moved, or made an announcement about the investigation into the perpetrator, before there was a few day's room to doubt the circumstances. This arrest only came a few days after the "hoax" hooha suggested that the absence of an investigation or arrest was decidedly odd. And it was.

Why would I assume that your only source of information was from the same article? So it turns out that you don't have any source for your claim that this is Joe biden's fault. Just you running an automatic pilot. Maybe it was Obama's fault, then?!

You think an illegal got his passport stamped or registered himself with the CBP?!

Jesus...

Better ask Thai Rath.

Wow, I bet they were devastated by that "loss".

Not quite as low as a couple of beers and a sandwich!

"More closures all the time" since the Chuwit closure? Such as?

Don't blame them, their "luxury" real guests pay a lot of money for the nice facilities and being invaded by a group non-paying guests buying a beer and a sandwich, for example, just to justify the use of the pool, beds, showers, toilets, etc., would p_iss off most people!

Restaurant/bar guests.

"They" didn't shut down the park, he did (the park that he donated the use of to the public free, from which he made nothing). Then he sold the lease for a lot of money for development. Nothing to do with the police. As far as "deadening people's lives on Sukhumvit" is concerned that garden has been closed to the public for 6 years.

Your taxi driver is lying, they all know where all those places are!

Why do you say that he's a moron?

Singaporean Chinese and mainland Chinese also.

Many Chinese (and other Asian) people have used western forenames as nicknames for donkey's years in place of their, sometimes difficult to pronounce, given names.

She could have washed the bowl, after all, the food wasn't in it, the food was in a new plastic bag!

it said old not chipped Read the post that I responded to! That poster referred to a chipped glass, I did not say that the bowl in the OP was chipped.

As you wrote, this is a forum and forums are a means to discuss subjects and to have differing opinions and observations. If something, very clearly, inaccurate is proposed on a forum as fact, is it not ok to dispute it? Your (1%) comment did not appear to be an accurate statement to me. I have not refuted "every single post on this forum" (your words) but if every post did contain inaccuracies proffered as fact, would it not be my (and other posters') privilege to dispute them? There appear to be many members here that do not like other posters having opinions opposing theirs...or disputing their "facts". If you don't approve of my comments there is the option to report them but, don't forget, this is a forum.

It's not my reading skills that need practice, far from it. You wrote that only 1% of your calls had an international prefix. In order to know that you must have answered at least 100 calls to get to the 1% (one call) statistic. If you had answered, say, only 25 calls, your 1% stat would mean that only ¼ of a call had the international prefix ((0.25%, impossible, obviously). The lowest number of calls that you must have answered to get 1% had to be 100. That's how you suggested that you had answered at least 100 calls.

This thread is about SPAM CALLS, because scam call are not made through automated PBX machines, as they can't talk and answer questions the recipient has. No, it is about scam calls... "Seized were 101 IP BPX machines, wi-fi routers and one arrest was made of a manager who was charged with fraud and computer crime that would likely result in the public being defrauded ... This latest move followed eight earlier raids in Bangkok on July 6th in Bang Na, Huay Khwang and Ladprao where IP PBX devices used to defraud the public were also seized ... We advise you to put the phone down immediately" See those rather relevant words, "fraud" and "defraud" and Thaivisa's advice to immediately hang up? That's because the OP is about scam calls.