Saanim

Suppose that the population will appreciate it all, forgetting their own sorrows...

Obviously. Anyway, can somebody enlighten me, what will get changed for the population when ones or the other will be at helm? -Will the inflation be lower? -Will the prices get down? -Will the mortgages be lower? -Will the taxes be lower? -Will be less homeless? -Will be less food stamp dependants? -Will the neighborhood be more safer? -Will be less fighting among parties? And what will get changed for the world? -Will the energy prices be lower? -Will the environment problems be better handled? -Will the world be more safer? -Will be less wars around the world?

That's what I had on mind that the other countries - who manage it over weekend - are not so developed.

I have liked his reply how the strong dollar is a good help to population, minding the high inflation...

It would be quite boring to get the business finished just over weekend as other - not so developed - countries do. After so many time and money invested in, the population needs to be further entertained.

The power input should be calculated not in Amps but in kW, separately for lights/heaters and for motors. This will be supplied by 3-phase source, while the Amps for motors will be increased by dividing by power factor ca. 0.7. As per the character of the consumers the sum of the installed power demands will hardly be always needed. An estimation of the worst case what can run together in a given time will reduce the figures substantially.

What I read: I am making a small wall. Whether a single or double skin the wall is surely made from more blocks placing each above other. In that case the hollow opening always downwards onto the mortar.

Actually, exactly the opposite. Otherwise the mortar placed on the next layer drops inside the cavity, not much left over for bonding the connection. If properly made and in double cladding with a cavity in-between, strengthened by inserting horizontally into the mortar a 3mm steel wire at each 2nd - 3rd layer, it can serve as a load bearing structure for the whole house. Then, no need for the usual concrete poles (sau) - protruding the walls, disturbing the furniture placing inside. And no need for the horizontal beams poured into extensive wooden formwork suported by thousand of bamboo poles, thus saving a lot of money and lot of time.

Oh sorry, I did not know that when the dollar is now worth more, Walmart and the others have reduced their prices, as well as the gasoline, electricity, etc. Hence, people are happy, no longer spending so much. Then, I am puzzled why they speak about high inflation?

Please enlighten us, how these figures have increased the buying power of the population when shopping today in their local Wallmart? Or did you mean your buying power at 7/11? In that case I agree. Of course, the inflation - even if not so high as at Wallmart - has reduced the buying power somehow.

Thai exporters: khop khun maag krap Mr. Biden. US exporters: ??? (start with e.g. US hardwood exporters trying to fill up empty containers returning to Asia)

Any idea how it's done in praxis? e.g.: -hacking the sophisticated (state-of-art) voting machine? -a call to voters, telling them how to vote? -mailing ballots? -bribing Musk? -bribing DT? -bribing Brandon (JB)? -bribing Fox? any other ideas?

But somewhere I read (in already closed debate) that: However the increased use of vote-by-mail, early voting and voter drop boxes has so far resulted in a trivial amount of fraud. Perhaps it was meant with tongue-in-cheek or the meaning of the "trivial" was misinterpreted?

It hasn't taken so long to change their views (while deceiving the masses in one way or the other) as had the media twenty years ago (in deceiving the masses in one way or the other)...

Do you truly believe everything what you read on internet?

Do you have a plausible attribution to your statement? Do you have a plausible attribution to your statement?

Do you have a plausible attribution to your statement? Do you have a plausible attribution to your statement?

It seems that you did not understand (your?) president. The president, the leader of the nation governing party, has said if you do not vote as I tell you you are threatening the democracy. Hmhm... (voting is a threat to the democracy?)

Is it really true that the president said that? He is the leader of a party that has the democracy in its name. And the democracy is a free choice and a free vote , isn't it? But if you want to vote for the other, that's a threat to democracy. Didn't he meant the threat to the D party? Anyway, it seems it's placing some principles upside down. Or all is a misinformation? Something like some other recent issues excitedly discussed...

Deleting of those words is surely not the biggest problem, as obviously was not the meaning of the OP. There are other much frequent deletions, aren't they? Does this "care" have also an impact on the Google's Family classification?

Exactly. A debate? Seeing a definition: A discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal Should it be a debate then it should also heed a democratic principle of a debate somebody had expressed many years ago: I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. However, who cares nowadays what is a "democratic principle"?

I am sorry that you cannot read my remarks from my "little corner". I do not spread tediously any shameful misinformation (why do you attack ad hominem?), just mentioning what I see and read. And it is no from RT news. Unfortunately, it's often classified unattributed or similar, so unworthy for you to read it. It seems that you are not well informed. I have added something what somebody above reported from Sky News (without any attribution link). Unfortunately, I too did not have immediately a link, so you could not read it. Now seeing it: Russian ambassador has 'evidence' UK special forces involved in attack on Black Sea fleet https://news.sky.com/story/britain-too-deep-into-ukraine-war-russian-ambassador-says-12737416 But perhaps it is a lie, I cannot know whether it is, can you?

According to other Sky News the Russian ambassador said that the evidence about the involvement of British special forces was handed over to the British ambassador and military attache in Moscow. And that the evidence will be made public soon.

Is it more clearer than this? Liz Truss asked about nuclear weapons: 'I'm ready to do it'

What a sacrifice of those suffering who decided to spend here rest of their life instead of in their perfect home country...