Skipalongcassidy

Disrespected the "plumbing" they were born with... now want it to work properly...

Your posts are quickly becoming more and more unintelligible... have you considered getting help? At least take a remedial English composition class.

Hopefully this gets rid of 2 bad apples at the same time... one dead one in prison. Hundreds more before you rest!

And you are not... HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

And a well earned loathing it is...

Right on... zoning out is the answer to the messed up world... whether it be alcohol... cannabis... or hard drugs... it's happening more now than in any time in history.

See... that's the problem right there in a nut shell... you have no idea who said it and in what context but you have TDS so bad that you assume it was trump... hahahaha... if you were half as smart as you think that you are... you would know who said it... where and when.

Why do you make that sound like a bad thing?

And your mundane point is what?

I've never been arrested if that's what you mean...

NOBODY MENTIONED TRUMP... until your TDS fueled rant... HAHAHAHA

Looks like one of the best systems ever created... what's your point???

Thank god or whatever you pray to that the forefathers of the USA established a republic that did not involve going along with "mob" rule... go back and study why the electoral college was formulated.

You mean like almost every other country in the world where drug use by the young is the go to behavior more than any time in history... ???

Yet the youth tend to squander al the vastness of those opportunities on drugs and social media in order to feel good... name one good accounting of the youth brigade in today's world that is bettering the world.

Here is a good argument against your claim as the most dishonest man in history... he is being surpassed by merchan... I was inside the court when the judge closed the Trump trial, what I saw shocked me: Alan Dershowitz The trial's judge was 'an absolute tyrant' By Alan Dershowitz New York Post Published May 21, 2024 7:00pm EDT CNN legal analyst Elie Honig said Monday that Michael Cohen's admission to stealing from Donald Trump was "more serious" than what Trump is alleged to have done. I have observed and participated in trials throughout the world. I have seen justice and injustice in China, Russia, Ukraine, England, France, Italy, Israel, as well as in nearly 40 of our 50 states. But in my 60 years as a lawyer and law professor, I have never seen a spectacle such as the one I observed sitting in the front row of the courthouse yesterday. The judge in Donald Trump’s trial was an absolute tyrant, though he appeared to the jury to be a benevolent despot. He seemed automatically to be ruling against the defendant at every turn. Many experienced lawyers raised their eyebrows when the judge excluded obviously relevant evidence when offered by the defense, while including irrelevant evidence offered by the prosecution. KEY TRUMP WITNESS, 'ROLLS-ROYCE' OF EXPERTS NIXED AFTER JUDGE 'RESTRICTS' TESTIMONY But when the defense’s only substantive witness, the experienced attorney Robert Costello, raised his eyebrows at one of New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan’s rulings, the court went berserk. Losing his cool and showing his thin skin, the judge cleared the courtroom of everyone including the media. For some reason, I was allowed to stay, and I observed one of the most remarkable wrong-headed biases I have ever seen. The judge actually threatened to strike all of Costello’s testimony if he raised his eyebrows again. That of course would have been unconstitutional because it would have denied the defendant his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses and to raise a defense. It would have punished the defendant for something a witness was accused of doing. Even if what Costello did was wrong, and it was not, it would be utterly improper and unlawful to strike his testimony — testimony that undercut and contradicted the government’s star witness. The judge’s threat was absolutely outrageous, unethical, unlawful and petty. Moreover, his affect while issuing that unconstitutional threat revealed his utter contempt for the defense and anyone who testified for the defendant. The public should have been able to see the judge in action, but because the case is not being televised, the public has to rely on the biased reporting of partisan journalists. But the public was even denied the opportunity to hear from journalists who saw the judge in action because he cleared the courtroom. I am one of the few witnesses to his improper conduct who remained behind to observe his deep failings. Even when journalists do report on courtroom proceedings, their accounts must be taken with a grain of salt. When you watch CNN or MSNBC, you generally see an account of a trial that never took place. They spin the events so much that reality is totally distorted. I experienced that distortion firsthand yesterday, when I saw one of my former students and research assistants, a CNN legal analyst named Norman Eisen, during a break and went over to him and asked him about his family. We chatted for a few minutes in the most friendly way. But NBC, the Daily Beast and other media decided to make up a story about the event. They claimed that I had a spat with my nemesis, rather than a friendly conversation with a former student. Their account was made up, yet it was circulated through the media. To his credit, Eisen wrote to the media to correct the account, saying that the person sitting next to him would confirm the media’s false reporting. I doubt we will see a retraction. This minor incident is simply the tip of a very large and deep iceberg of false reporting about the trial that can only occur because the proceedings are not being televised. There are television cameras in the courtroom, and they record and transmit every word, but not to the public; only select reporters in the overflow room see what the cameras transmit. There is absolutely no good reason why a trial of this importance, or any trial, should not be televised live and in real time. Allowing the public to see their courts in action is the best guarantee of fairness. As Justice Louis Brandeis wisely said a century ago, "Sunlight is the best disinfectant."

This just in from the leading democrap pundit... "Why are we forgiving student loans for people that go to Harvard?" Carville said, before referencing Scott Galloway. "Which, according to Scott Galloway, quite accurately, is nothing but a hedge fund that has classrooms, well, they got a $52 billion f------ surplus! Why are taxpayers going to bail these people out?!"

HAHAHAHA... not really

How to Get a Residence Certificate in Thailand - Easy Guide (thethailandlife.com)

What are you... a racist... I see plenty of Hispanic and black persons in those pictures... its actually a good cross section of the population of the Bronx.

The news: Aviation estimated about 3,500 people were at the MAGA rally... in the Bronx that is significant... PS... RAWSTORY is rated at -4 bias rating... that's as far left as the ratings go and they have no source quoted... they made it up.

And unfortunately there are supposedly mature men who take advantage of that fact... and blame the victim... OMF

Where do you draw the line... what age is too young for you? Sex trafficking involves some form of forced or coerced sexual exploitation that is not limited to prostitution, and has become a significant and growing problem in both the United States and the larger global community. The costs to society include the degradation of human and women’s rights, poor public health, disrupted communities, and diminished social development. Victims of sex trafficking acquire adverse physical and psychological health conditions and social disadvantages. Thus, sex trafficking is a critical health issue with broader social implications that requires both medical and legal attention. Healthcare professionals can work to improve the screening, identification, and assistance of victims of sex trafficking in a clinical setting and help these women and girls access legal and social services.

Ya think...