Cameroni

Better that than banging a 59 year old who goes to work, lol. I'll take syphilis please.

Even by the level of your idiotic posts, number 1 is exceptionally dumb. If she has a full time job she will be out of the house, interacting with other guys, and the risk she will get to know a nice Thai or Farang guy increases exponentially. You're basically inviting her to cheat. Plus she can't tend to your needs or manage the house while she's out. To send her to work is the most stupid advice one could possibly give. No kids, of course, that's more than obvious. Number 3 only applies to ugly poor and impotent men, if you are still nice to look at, can perform in the bedroom and pay for her boat noodles, you're already way ahead of the competition in Thailand and you can easily have rel with a 24 year old no problem.

Brits are a naturally offensive people, as British hooliganism proves. Something in their confrontational and offensive nature can often be funny. But in terms of comedy, since the Russel Brand, who was never funny, or Ricky Gervais, who just takes offensive obnoxiousness to the max without being actually funny, David Baddiel etc, you have to conclude British comedy has lost its touch. The only funny comedian in the UK at the moment is a Sri Lankan, Jonathan Ranganathan.

What are you talking about, there is a massive trail of statements by the West going back to 1989 where the West lies to Russia that it would not expand NATO. Russia repeatedly tells the West clearly that it feels threatened by NATO expansion and that Ukraine joining NATO is a red line, that it concerns their national security. In 2008 at the Bucharest conference NATO reveals Ukraine will become a member. So it was, very clearly, the West that lied to Russia. There have been endless rounds of negotiation with Ukraine. When Ukraine tried to stiff Russia over gas, before that the Russo - Ukrainian friendship Treaty, endless rounds from 2014 to 2022. https://www.declassifieduk.org/lets-just-fight-how-britain-prefers-war-over-peace-in-ukraine/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_negotiations_in_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine Of course it's very hard to negotiate when the British prime minister flies in and tells Ukraine "Don't sign, if you do the West will not support Ukraine. We will send you billions and arms, let's just fight". Though of course, it was a miracle that Russia would negotiate at all, since Ukraine had repeatedly ignored the provisions of any treaty with Russia it agreed to and taken military and other steps, such as banning Russian social media in Ukraine, to provoke Russians in Ukraine. Russia did not "forment" any insurrection in the Donbass, the civil unrest in the majority Russian Donbass region was a result of the pro West demonstrations in the Western parts of Ukraine, which were gainst the interests of the Russian majority in Donbass. And of course the Crimean invasion was the result of the NATO disclosure in 2008 that Ukraine would join NATO, and the constant provocations of Russia by Ukraine before that, not paying their gas bill, prohibiting Russian websites and social media, etc. The Donbass is 90% Russian, Kiev had neglected the region so badly that they voted to rejoin the CIS again for the Russian language to be the main language, 90% voted in favour of this. The people of the Donbass wanted to rid themselves of the neglectful and incompetent Ukrainian government. This is total nonsense on stilts, the Russian economy is NOT a war economy, it is very much a majority civil economy at the moment and the Russian economy is blooming at the moment. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-68823399 If you are so completely ignorant on basically everything, rickudon, it would be better you don't comment on things you have no information or do not understand at all.

I really can't be bothered, it's just total nonsense.

My pleasure.

This post is almost 100 per cent wrong in everything. Literally almost every sentence is dripping with ignorance and ill-informed nonsense. One would correct it, but it would take so long.

Why, oh why, would the head of the Ukrainian delegation lie to say something like this? What you are suggesting does not even make sense. You are being completely ridiculous and just sticking your head in the sand because this Ukrainian witness report does not fit your view on the war. Lol. I almost feel sorry for you.

Yes, I am sure Boris Johnson flying in unexpectedly and delivering the message "The West will not support Ukraine if you sign this peace deal with Russia, and btw, let us just fight, we will send you billions and weapons" had absolutely no bearing on the decision whatsoever. Do you also have a bridge in Brooklyn you would care to sell?

The Financial Times can be reliable, but it is still no guarantee of truthfulness.

I was not talking about Boris Liar Johnson. I was talking about that Ukrainian bloke who headed the Ukrainian delegation and said that Johnson came, said the West would not support Ukraine if they signed and that Johnson said "let us just fight".

You are wrong. It was not.

She also prosecuted this innocent man. Her conviction was overturned, but the man had his life ruined thanks to Kamala Harris. Her record as a prosectuor is litany of failures and ruined lives. https://abcnews.go.com/2020/years-anthony-harris-conviction-overturned-murder-girl-remains/story?id=84376442

That is certainly more likely than nuclear response by the US. However, if the US were to do a repeat of the bombings of the Serbians, we should remember in that campaign it took NATO 10,000 plus sorties to make any impact on the conflict. And Serbia does not have the airfoce Russia has. In addition such a conventional warfare response would certianly be a hot war and escalation into a nuclear conflict would always be a possibillity. I strongly suspect both parties would negotiate before risking mutual nuclear annihiliation.

Obviously when they do not have a reason to lie and gain nothing by the statement you can consider if the statement could be true. Nobody lies 100 per cent of the time. Not even Boris Liar Johnson. What he said about Trump is absolutely true. With Trump in the white house, the Ukraine war would not have happened.

Because he reported on a meeting with a Brit, this was not an election issue. It was not a reputation issue for him. That account is obviously the truth. They do not lie 100 per cent of the time.

So Karl Ottfried Müller was right. The Dorians came from the north. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorian_invasion

What are you on about? I said the Ukrainian politicians are liars as well. Can it be any clearer?

Yah, but sadly all the talk of increased voter registration due to Swift is not materialising. Democrats have been losing voters in Pennsylvania over the past four years, and Republicans are salivating over the prospect of former President Donald Trump recapturing the biggest swing state in the Nov. 5 election. Nearly 300,000 registered Democrats have dropped off the rolls since 2020, and Republicans have netted about 50,000 new registered voters in a state that President Biden won by roughly 80,000 votes. In Luzerne County, near Mr. Biden’s hometown of Scranton, Democrats held a 20,000 registered voter advantage in 2020. As of last week, they trail Republicans by a few hundred votes. Mr. Trump won the county in 2020 and is expected to steamroll it this year. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/oct/3/voter-registration-gains-provide-good-omen-for-tru/ Musk and Trump, united in harmony. Could it get any better?

It's not actually. Project 2025 just says all should be done to make abortion more difficult, but it does not support an outright ban on abortion.

You think Zelensky going to the US talking up his "victory plan" as his city of Vuhledar fell to the Russians was not a master class in lies and deception? You think they don't know they can't win this war? They know.

And the Democrats have been losing registered voters in Pennsylvania for a long time, the number of their registered voters went down. It's like all the stars are lining up for Trump.

Trump just needs Pennsylvania. And it's in the bag! Democrats have been losing voters in Pennsylvania over the past four years, and Republicans are salivating over the prospect of former President Donald Trump recapturing the biggest swing state in the Nov. 5 election. Nearly 300,000 registered Democrats have dropped off the rolls since 2020, and Republicans have netted about 50,000 new registered voters in a state that President Biden won by roughly 80,000 votes. In Luzerne County, near Mr. Biden’s hometown of Scranton, Democrats held a 20,000 registered voter advantage in 2020. As of last week, they trail Republicans by a few hundred votes. Mr. Trump won the county in 2020 and is expected to steamroll it this year. “We have flipped the county red,” said Gene Ziemba, the county’s Republican Party chairman. “So not only are we going to win, we’re going to smoke them.” The change in registration is almost all on the Democratic side. Luzerne County had about 106,000 Democratic voters in 2020 and about 86,000 in the latest tally on Sept 23. Republican registration rose from 86,000 to 87,000. Independent and other third-party voters stayed roughly the same. Democrats’ numbers slid from about 4.2 million to 3.9 million statewide. Republicans gained about 50,000 voters to reach nearly 3.6 million. Independents showed the biggest movement, with about 95,000 new voters, climbing past 1.4 million. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/oct/3/voter-registration-gains-provide-good-omen-for-tru/ So much for the Taylor Swift voter registration efffect, lol. Democrats are losing registered voters, the number of their registered voters actually went down signficantly. Lol.

It is remarkable isn't it. Yah, politicians are liars across the board, who are we kidding.

He certainly denied what the head of the Ukraine delegation was saying, that he flew in to say the West won't support Ukraine if the sign the peace deal and they should just fight. Johnson is a world class liar of course, though I don't know why he denies reports from the Ukrainians themselves, as if that were believable.