Cameroni

Could the delectable and highly intelligent Candace be right? Could Brigitte be a man? Imagine.

Absolutely shocking story. I can well believe that a Filipina would become aggressive and nasty, especiallly one from Mindanao. I have seen it myself. However, of course you can also be falsely accused in Thailand, but Thai girls are not that nasty as a general rule.

My gf is better looking than her.

No you do not. You are just guaranteed a visa waiver stamp.

So you want to gloss over the fact that the head of the Ukrainian delegation is on record for stating that Boris Johnson flew to Kiev to tell Zelensky not to sign a peace treaty, but to fight instead, by quoting AI? Very disingenous, as everyone knows you can make AI say anything based on the question. One should never trust anyone arguing with AI, see below Did Davyd Arakhamia state that Boris Johnson told Ukraine not to sign a peace treaty ChatGPT said: Yes, Davyd Arakhamia, a prominent Ukrainian lawmaker and ally of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, has stated that former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson advised Ukraine against signing a peace agreement with Russia during negotiations in early 2022.The Guardian In a November 2023 interview with Ukrainian journalist Natalia Moseychuk, Arakhamia revealed that after returning from Istanbul, where preliminary peace talks were held, Johnson visited Kyiv and urged Ukrainian leaders not to sign any agreement with Russia, instead advising them to continue fighting. Arakhamia emphasized that Johnson's advice was not an order but rather a recommendation, and that Western allies, including the UK, had consistently advised against entering into security guarantees with Russia that were not credible at the time .Reddit+5Express+5Reddit+5Voice of America Fact is, 3 days after Johnson flew to Kiev, the peace treaty was binned. Johnson, Biden and Co never had any intention to provide any security guarantees. They preferred to sacrifice Ukrainian soldiers and civilians, rather than put their own nations at risk.

Sae khalloh to ma liddle friend Avangard: Hypersonic glide vehicle. 9M730 Burevestnik: Nuclear-powered cruise missile. 3M22 Zircon: Scramjet-powered hypersonic anti-ship missile. Kh-47M2 Kinzhal: Hypersonic air-launched ballistic missile. Poseidon: Nuclear-capable unmanned underwater drone. RS-28 Sarmat: Super-heavy, MIRV-equipped intercontinental ballistic missile. https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/world/will-putin-respond-to-ukraine-s-drone-strikes-with-super-weapon-list-of-weapons-not-used-by-russia-2025-06-02-992919

Lol, yes, I'm sure the Ukrainians carefully calculated depreciation of these Soviet era aircraft when they presented the figure. The toothfairy says "Hello". Russia will replace these planes quicker than you can say "Hypersonic missile". But 7 billion. Sure. Not at all Ukrainian propaganda.

Vladimir Putin is poised to strike back at Ukraine after Kyiv delivered a devastating blow to the Russian air force on Sunday, with European defence officials warning that Moscow is stockpiling a massive contingent of battle tanks and ammunition. Germany's defence chief warned that Putin has fostered a massive increase in battle tanks - as many as 1,500 each year - and artillery, to be used against Ukraine Chris Cavoli, NATO's top commander, echoed the concerns in recent comments, telling the Senate Armed Services Committee that Russia was replacing troops, tanks and munitions at an 'unprecedented pace', on course to 'build a stockpile three times greater than the United States and Europe combined'. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14771383/putin-revenge-spymasters-nuclear-bombers.html So much for tanks being "obsolete".

Please. Some cowardly drones. Cause a few fires. Very underhand. But hardly effective. It will have zero impact on the beating the Ukrainians are getting on every front.

No. In the fourth round: "By 16 March, Mykhailo Podoliak was assigned as the chief negotiator for the Ukrainian peace delegation, who indicated that peace negotiations of a 15-point plan would involve the retraction of Russian forces from their advanced positions in Ukraine, along with international guarantees for military support and alliance in case of renewed Russian military action, in return for Ukraine not pursuing further affiliation with NATO." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_negotiations_in_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine That's what Ukraine wanted. "Security Guarantees". Biden, Kamala and Johnson knew this. They had zero intention to provide these. It's not that they couldn't. They simply were not prepared to go to war with Russia and risk nuclear annihilation over Ukraine NATO membership. So Biden sent Johnson to deliver the message to Zelensky: "Sign and you will not have the support of the US or UK". Just fight. With those "security guarantees" the talks become meaningless. Zelensky then had to fight. This is what happened.

But how is it a Hiroshima "of" drones a Drone Hiroshima? What is that supposed to mean?

I still don't get it? Are you overstretching the Hiroshima analogy maybe a tad? How are a few drones comparable to Hiroshima? Do explain.

I did several times, by showing how the head of the Ukrainian delegation reported that Johnson came to visit Kiev to tell Zelensky not to sign and to fight, corroborated by several sources both from the US and Ukraine. Three days later the protracted peace talks were binned. I note you have nothing further than word theatre.

Hardly, Hiroshima was massive destruction on an impresssive scale, here a few planes caught a bit of fire. How is this in any way resembling Hiroshima?

Poor man's Pearl Harbour.

No, it's not. But if you take a train to Paris, as I have, it will strike you how dystopian and miserable, downright ugly and repulsive the outskirts of Paris are, the Balieus, where the French confine their North African and middle Eastern migrants. There must be a lot of pent-up anger and frustration living in those awful places. They make the projects look like paradise.

On 24 June 2010 the Ukrainian Cabinet of Ministers approved an action plan to implement an annual national program of cooperation with NATO that year.[82] This included:[82] Involvement of Ukrainian aviation and transport material in the transportation of cargo and personnel of the armed forces of NATO's member states and partners participating in NATO-led peacekeeping missions and operations; The continuation of Ukraine's participation in a peacekeeping operation in Kosovo; Possible reinforcing of Ukraine's peacekeeping contingents in Afghanistan and Iraq; Ukraine's participation in a number of international events organized by NATO; Training of Ukrainian troops in the structures of NATO members. Ukraine and NATO continued to hold joint seminars and joint tactical and strategical exercises and operations during the Yanukovych Presidency. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine–NATO_relations So whilst Ukraine was briefly non-aligned, this came to a swift end when Yanukovych was ousted in the CIA formented Maidan uprising. And even during this "non-alignment" Ukraine was co-operating closely with and aiding NATO. But all that is irrelevant, Ukraine had shown it was receptive to switching sides to Europe and NATO. NATO had shown that it had lied, and deceived Russia that it would not expand eastwards. When NATO brazenly announced in Bucharest that Ukraine would become a NATO member, it was only THEN that Russia understood it was lied to and the danger of Ukraine becoming more friendly with the West than Russia was very real. Only THEN did Russia resolved to take military action, when years and years of making clear that Ukraine was a red line, when years of diplomatic efforts were shown to be fruitless. The only language the West understands, sadly is force.

Which is why Ukraine insisted on "security guarantees". However, when Johnson flew in to tell Zelensky that the West would not support any deal with Russia it was clear that there would be no security guarantees, so Zelensky had no choice but to fight as Johnson asked him to.. Of course Johnson ended the peace deal. Massive, and very prolongued peace negotiations that had gone into four rounds were abruptly ended 3 days after Zelensky welcomed Boris Johnson. You have to read the evidence like an adult. Very obviously Johnson ended the peace deal. Without security guarantees he knew Ukraine could not sign. Without Western backing it was impossible for Ukraine to sign. Of course Zelensky has to make it look like a principled decision, Russia were war criminals, etc etc, but the crux of the matter obviously was that Johnson flew in precisely with the aim to abort the peace talks and to exhort Zelensky to fight Russia instead. Zelensky's denials are not worth the paper they're written on. He just wants to make himself look good. He can hardly admit that he was railroaded by the West into war, can he? The fact is there were long peace negotiations at the start of the war, when Russia offered to end the war if Ukraine would become neutral and forego NATIO, as well some territories Russia considered hers. Ukraine would have signed if they had received security guarantees, ie had the West backed the deal, but Johnson made clear the West would not. So Ukraine had no option but to fight. For obvious reasons Zelensky would not admit that is was happened, but the head of the Ukrainian delegation has admitted it. "Elsewhere in the interview, Arakhamia brought up former U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson's surprise visit to Kyiv in April 2022. He said Johnson encouraged Ukraine to not "sign anything" with Russia and "just fight. https://www.newsweek.com/russia-offered-end-war-if-ukraine-dropped-nato-bid-kyiv-official-1847373

The French president was filmed being face-shoved by a woman, so the French have lost all respect for their president. In the absence of respect, there is no fear, so they do as they please.

You can keep posting misinformation if you want, but the historical record is very clear. Davyd Arakhamia, the head of the Ukrainian delegation, has said publicly that Johnson flew in to tell Zelensky to fight. "According to the lawmaker, while another round of talks was underway in Istanbul, Boris Johnson unexpectedly came to Kyiv on April 9 and said that Ukraine "shouldn't sign anything with them at all – and let's just fight." Three days after Johnson's departure from Kyiv, Putin publicly stated that talks with Ukraine had “turned into a dead end. https://www.kyivpost.com/post/24645 So it was pure coincidence then that the Ukraine/Russia peace talks that went into four rounds ended abruptly 3 days after Boris Johnson flew to Kiev?

Please. NATO grandly announced Ukraine was on track to become a member. Ukraine has enshrined the goal of NATO membership in its very constitution. in February 1994, Ukraine was the first post-Soviet country to conclude a framework agreement with NATO in the framework of the Partnership for Peace initiative, supporting the initiative of Central and Eastern European countries to join NATO. During President Viktor Yushchenko's first official visit to the United States, President George W. Bush declared: "I am a supporter of the idea of Ukraine's membership in NATO. On 27 April 2006 at a meeting of NATO foreign ministers, the representative of the NATO Secretary General, James Appathurai, stated that all members of the alliance support the speedy integration of Ukraine into NATO. At the NATO summit in Bucharest in April 2008, NATO decided it would not yet offer membership to Georgia and Ukraine; nevertheless, NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said that those two countries would eventually become members. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine–NATO_relations

More lies, before the terrorist attack in Russia the Ukrainian forces were retreating and the Russians were advancing in Ukraine.

Liar! "According to a Foreign Affairs article from October 2022, multiple former senior U.S. officials said that “Russian and Ukrainian negotiators appeared to have tentatively agreed on the outlines of a negotiated interim settlement Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett played a large role in those April 2022 negotiations. In an interview, he also claimed that Russia and Ukraine were willing to make major concessions and end the conflict, until pressure from then UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson convinced Zelensky to back down from such a deal. Davyd Arakhamia, a Ukrainian parliamentary representative at the talks, made a similar claim. “They were hoping almost to the end to put pressure on us to sign such a document and accept neutrality. It was a big deal for them,” he said in November 2023, referring to the Russians. “They were ready to end the war if we, like Finland once did, would accept neutrality and pledge not to join NATO. In fact, that was the main point. All the rest are cosmetic and political ‘additions. https://responsiblestatecraft.org/ukraine-russia-2669196351/

That would just leave cheatin' Ukraine free to gangbang with hansum man USA and the EU. We both know that would not resolve any problems.

Actually there was. Zelensky was about to sign, when Boris Johnson flew in and told him that if Zelensky signed he would have no backing from the US or Britain. But that they should fight instead. Russia gave a last chance for peace. But Biden, Kamala and Johnson made sure Zelensky could not take it.