Jingthing

Yes, born a female. She does have an abnormality. Such cases have nothing to do with issues around TRANSGENDER athletes. She is not a transgender person.

My information does not indicate that she was born intersex.

Funny. The anti woke fanatics are always saying its about genitals at birth. Khelif born a girl with a vagina, NOT at transgender person, has her gender at birth ID on her passport -- FEMALE. This isn't black and white folks. Don't act like it is for political game playing.

The IOC in charge of the Olympics questions the test done by that other body which they don't recognize. People want to make this black and white and milk it as culture wars type thing. There is more to it than that. Be fair.

You never know.

She has a womb, right?

It ain't the Ritz, folks.

The article leaves out a key fact. Khelif is a woman. She is not a transgender person. It's funny to me that right wingers are always mocking people that can't define a woman. Khelif has a womb. A woman, yes or no? Is it her fault that she has genetics that make her athletically superior any more than was it Mark Spitz's fault that he had a body perfectly designed to be an elite swimmer? If you have a chess match and one player is a super genius are you going to ban him?

More like willful ignorance. The same kind of knuckleheads who insist the US isn't a democracy.

Welcome to Thailand where everything is great. Or else.

They are not trans. They are women. They cleared to compete by the IOC. They are now victims of a right wing culture wars just because of their looks.

No evidence they have or ever had penises.

No evidence they have or ever had penises.

But you haven't proven they're males!!!!!

Great point. No way they would change the gender for a trans person. Maybe she's a freak but she's a female freak.

I want it to be looked at but I reject witch hunts based on superficial appearances. I'm seeing this as different than about transgender athletes. If it was proven they were transgender I would understand saying they shouldn't be allowed to compete. But I've seen zero evidence that they are transgender. Back to what I said about Mark Spitz. Look at his body and if you know about swimming you know he had an "unfair" advantage. So again just looking too manly is no grounds for disqualification.

Ad hominem garbage. You lose.

I haven't read a single thing saying the two controversial looking too manly athletes are transgender. Have you? If so, please post the proof

Many people are scared of their own shadows. Trump vs. Harris no contest. Fascism vs. Democracy. Simple.

I would tend to give credibility to the IOC in matters related to athlete eligibility for the Olympics.

By not enacting Project 2025 for one. Especially the part where skilled and experienced civil servants are fired and replaced by people only qualified by loyalty to dear leader Donald Trump. That's fascism.

Spooky. Interesting choice of words.

The forces of all the allies were needed. I'm not buying the Kremlin propaganda that it was only because of the Russians.

Prove that with a source.

The IOC has rejected the validity of those tests. So stop acting like this is a clear black and white situation. It is not. Again by your logic Mark Spitz should have been disqualified because he was born with genetic advantages. If the athletes were born females, they are females, right? Or do you have a problem defining what is a woman?