WDSmart

I support what Al Green did, but I also believe he should be censored. Many protest movements break the law or rules when protesting and are arrested or face some actions. The protestors just have to believe their protest is more important than the punishment.

Sounds like a great idea to me. I wish my home country, the USA, would do the same.

I assume then that Trump will also suspend aid to any country that discriminates against Blacks, Asians, Arabs, Jews, etc...

Although non-citizens are not guaranteed all the rights citizens are, isn't this discrimination based on their political choices? In other words, wouldn't this violate their freedom of speech if they were citizens?

Okay, I misread it. It's not 7 CE; it's the 7th Century CE. But 1,400 years, or even just 1,000 years, by the time it reached the Palestinians, is still a long time. In any event, this Forum is about Trump cutting funding for schools that don't punish people who demonstrate against Israel. That, IMO, violates the First Amendment (not the Second). If the demonstrators are breaking any other school rules or public laws, they should be subject to whatever penalties those carry. The schools themselves should not be the victims of Federal punishments.

The link I found said Islam began in 7 CE. That would have been about 2,018 years ago. History of Islam - Wikipedia That was the source for my post. Now the religion might not have spread to the area that is now called Palestine for many years after that, maybe even 600 as you suggest. In any event, the Palestinians have bee Arab Muslims for a long, long time.

They were Jews back then, and they are Israelis now. Most of them, I agree, are Jewish. The current Palestinians have been Muslims for well over 2,000 years.

No, you are so pro-Israeli that you won't even entertain the idea that they have ever done anything wrong in this 70-year conflict. Even if you don't want to look at the historical facts, Israel is now killing innocent civilians in both Gaza and the West Bank. Calling that some kind of legitiment "revenge" is despicable.

Yes, I am a citizen of the USA. "Americans" could refer to anyone in North, Central, or South America. I mistyped the number of the Ammendment in my comment, but corrected it after that was brought to my attention.

The Israelis were not around then, either. They were Hebrews then. The Canonites were around 3,000 years ago when the Hebrews took over their land (with force) after fleeing Egypt (according to the Old Testament and the Koran). Today's Palestinians are descendants of the Cananites. Seventy years ago, when the UK (which claimed it "owned" Palestine) first gave part of that land to the Jews, and then a couple of years later, the UN formalized that, there were a lot more Palestinians there than Jews. Also, since then, Israel has, over time, taken over more and more of the land assigned to the Palestinians. I'm not anti-Israel. I am for a two-state solution so that both Israelis and Palestinians can share that land in peace. But I doubt that will ever happen.

I don't deny that Hamas has committed acts of terrorism, but so has Israel, both now in the bombing of Gaza and historically. You seem to ignore that.

Lock him up!

Yes, I agree...

Being a far-left socialist myself, I realize that the next four years will be a miserable time for me. My most bitter disappointment is not Trump himself, but the knowledge that so many of my fellow countrymen support him. 🥹

I am a far-left liberal and vehemently oppose Trump and almost all of his policies. My biggest disappointment is that so many of my fellow countrymen support him. 🥹

Yes, it does, unless you are doing more than criticizing them.

We've had this discussion many times, so I don't think I'll convince you of it now, but I will again state that October 7 did not just happen for no reason. This deadly conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians has been going on for at least 70 years, and you could even say 3,000 years. I support the Palestinians, and you support the Israelis. I know that won't change.

"Accused" does not guarantee a conviction, but calling someone something does not make that true, either. No, I don't consider everyone who disagrees with me stupid, but I often consider them misinformed. And, on occasion, I, too, have been misinformed.

They were justifying Hama's attack on Israel and the taking of hostages. That has already happened. That is free speech. It is not inciting violence. Celebrating the IDF's continuing devastation of Gaza and the attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank is inciting violence. Wouldn't you call any military organization accused of war crimes "terrorists"?

You are correct that free speech does not give you the right to attack anyone. It does, however, give you the right to criticize them.

Barricading themselves in private property and stopping classes is not free speech. Criticizing IDF terrorists for their continuing attacks on civilians in Gaza and the West Bank and attempts at driving all Palestinians off their land is.

I thought it(freedom of speech) is in the 1st Amendment. The 2nd, is the People's Right to Keep and Bear Arms. us constitution first and second amendment - Google Search Thanks for the correction. I have now changed it.

This law, as described above, would not be as audacious as some would think. For example, right now, if two or three people with guns were to come into a bank's branch and rob the bank, or someone would dig their way into a bank's vault and steal money, the bank wouldn't charge their customers for that loss, would they? So, why should they not accept the risk of doing their business on websites or apps?

Unfortunately, I wholeheartedly agree with this article... 🥹

Oops! So much for Trump's promise to defend free speech as granted in our 1st Amendment.... 😮