WDSmart

I can't be a "true socialist" as long as I live in a country with at least some capitalism. I can only advocate for a greater emphasis on socialistic features and a diminishing reliance on capitalism, which I do in my personal life, here online, and in my writing. I have written and published ten books, all reflecting my views on this in various ways.

Your "one person in a million" comment is probably very close. On the news yesterday, I heard that the leader of the NCAA was asked how many transgender athletes they have. His answer was 10. There are about 500,000 athletes in the NCAA. That's .002%. That begs the question of just how big a problem this is that we have to discuss it multiple times every day.

Which I assume you or your friends/family bought? Ot like a good commie did you just take them over? I bought and created them. Of course, being from the USA, I grew up in and participated in a capitalistic economy. I would much prefer the society I live in now to be socialist. "Commies" don't need to take over anything. In a communist economy, all resources are equally shared. No one "owns" anything, or you could say everyone "owns" everything.

Both of those things will happen as a result of democrat leadership. With trump there would have been no wars I agree with you that, unfortunately, that will be the outcome of both of these conflicts. But I disagree with your label of Trump as "democratic leadership." The federal government is not a result of democracy. It's the result of a republic. And even if the majority of my fellow citizens (USA) are for one thing or the other, that does not make it a "good thing." And right now, I am definitely not in favor of what I think the majority, or at least a plurality of my fellow citizens, want.

I don't know the answer to that, but I'd assume these genital/chromosome deformations could be separate or together, but probably often together.

That explanation is so 2023. They've moved on. What Trump and his sycophants are trying to do is move us backward to when even LGs were treated as outcasts, and denying the existence of any such thing as BTQIA+s...

Ending the war in Ukraine (or in Gaza) by giving part of Ukraine to the Russians (or giving Gaza to Israel) is a "good thing."

Yes, I agree with you on the deformed genital issue. And yes. Just as genitals can be deformed at birth, so can their chromosomes. Instead of being either XX or XY, they could be XXY or some variation of that.

No, I didn't say that. I was just correcting your accusation that all transgender people are only "pretending." I don't think a transgender people should always be treated as the gender they believe they are. I have, time after time, only said that I think the rules as to how people are designated as one gender or the other should be stated, not just left to anyone to decide as they see fit.

I live as a socialist as best I can. It's easier to do that here in the rural areas of Thailand than in my home country, the USA. I have a lot of land and resources, and I share them with my community. I do not charge them for anything. I will continue to champion the ideals of socialism and bring to everyone's attention the failures of capitalism.

The acronym is not "LGBT." It's "LGBTQIA+" LGBTQIA+ Meaning of Each Letter & Acronym Breakdown | SFGMC

And how then do you classify a person who is deformed or has mixed-up chromosomes?

I don't know what Marx has to do with this, but... I don't think "men pretending to be women should be allowed in girls' and women's showers and sports," I do think that a person who believes they are a girl or woman should not be prevented from going in women's showers or sports without have a rule that explicitly states how you determine if a person is a man or woman. And, I think all of that should be applicable vice-versa, that is women "pretending" or believing that are men.

I have no guilt. I don't know how you ever thought that. I'm very happy with who I have been, who I am now, and who I will be.

Yes, society does have to change to embrace my ideals (not moral code). I know that, especially after the last presidential election. But that doesn't mean I'll change my ideals. That just means I have to wait a little longer.

Thanks for this, but just how do you determine d or e above unless you are observing this at conception? The rule and determination has to be made many years later, after the person has been born, and maybe not until they are mature.

Yes, I do mean to be right in all my posts...

Trump would not save anyone from a burning building unless it resulted in a profit for him. Yes, my hate runs deep. And, yes, I'm sure much of that is because of the anti-capitalist/socialist part of me that I do add to my posts from time to time.

Yes! You are correct in this last statement, except for calling them "good things." Nothing Trump does or says he'll do is a "good thing."

I think if there are showers and sports leagues designated as only men's and women's, the men's should only be open to men and the women's only to women. The problem lies in how to determine if a person is a man or a woman. That determination should be set and made into law. Then, it will be the law and I will respect it, even if I disagree with it.

Why? he is paying for it, very generous There are three reasons I can think of right now: 1. Trump is not generous, and any money he pays will not be his. 2. The White House doesn't need a ballroom. That's for frivolous activities. 3. Trump. Anything he does or says is despicable to me.

I'm sorry to hear this... 🥹

😁😁 😁😁 😁😁 😁😁 !

Despicable! 😡

I'm not necessarily in favor of this, but again, I have to ask: why is this proposal only for banning transgender athletes out of women's sports? What about transgender athletes in men's sports? Why is Trump being so discriminatory (as if that surprises anyone).