JonnyF

The point was very clear in the original post. If you are not sure, please re-read it. In the meantime, quit with the strawman nonsense.

Where did I defend him? Oh that's right, I didn't. 😆

Serving? Screwing might be more accurate.

I'd fully support Keir having a break. May I suggest 3 decades as a suitable period?

The ECHR is a joke. It's a shame it's so difficult to leave.

Ummmmm, OK Joe, makes perfect sense. 😆

What an idiot. 😆 I didn't see any racist language there though. Did they miss that part from the report?

Claiming to be gay or Christian is a common tactic for people from Islamic countries looking for refugee status in gullible Western countries. Let's judge him by his actions not his words.

Whilst Dianne's motives are questionable (pining for her ex lover Corbyn) she is correct for once. Starmer is a dangerous fool.

Aussies never let the truth get in the way of a good yarn.

Yep. Muslims are advised by the police to hide the weapons in the mosque. Non Muslims get 10 years for possession. 2 tier Britain.

Starmer is a complete fool for appointing an idiot like Mandelson with a history of insulting Trump for this position. The relationship between the UK and the US is over until the next UK election.

Shame on the Democrats and the gaslighters arguing on their behalf.

Brewer is great. Talks the truth. Very honest. But it's 2024 in Starmer's Britain so I hope she has a good lawyer.

I bet he's Islamaphobic like the German Christian market attacker.

It's a shame they can't be so thorough and motivated for potential attacks from the cultural enrichers. But i guess that would be racist or [chooseaword]phobic.

Terrible. I hope the survivors can pull through. Pretty disgusting that they are trying to blame Islamaphobia for attacks on a Christian Christmas market. At least they've named him this time as opposed to "a man from Berlin" followed by pictures of him as a 10 year old.

Another meaningless deflection.

It doesn't matter what the Daily Mail/Telegraph said about it. It matters what Abbott said about Starmer. The video of the actual interview was in the link, but I know you refuse to watch (or more accurately refuse to acknowledge watching) videos because it removes your ability to deflect with inane comments about the source that posted it, as you did in the very post I am quoting. 😆 I guess you can't teach an old dog new tricks. 😏

Yes I'd take a wild guess that would be his angle. Him and his spendidly sultry "Spanish" wife Hilaria doing her wonderful "I am 'ilaria and I speaka da Englith with da Spanith accent" impersonation, formerly known as Hillary Thomas from Boston. What a couple of weirdos. 😆

Not if they're on a terrorist watchlist. They could quite easily be apprehended at customs. Of course, given that it's Britain it might be better to arrive by dinghy, therefore avoiding all that pesky customs stuff with the added benefit of a free stay in a 5 star hotel.

"Tough choices" is politician speak for poor decisions. Starmer makes plenty of them.

Are you suggesting the "rightwing press" created the video of the interview with AI? Desperate stuff. 😆 Abbott said it. It is irrelevant who reported it, although your continued dodging of the subject is well noted.

Whether or not I like Abbott is completely irrelevant. The point that you choose to deliberately ignore is that Starmer is losing support within his own party. He's that bad. He's on very thin ice.

Even Dianne Abbott has turned on him. 😆 Didn't you get the memo? He's losing the party. Maybe time for you to change course? https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/waspi-women-pensions-starmer-diane-abbott-b2667031.html