JonnyF

The evidence speaks for itself. As does your continued gaslighting.

The government pressured The Met in exchange for free tickets. Clown show.

Russia can relax. We've got Starmer to do all that. Far more effectively than Russia ever could.

You mean, apart from all the other American citizens held by Russia for a much longer period that were overlooked in order to free Briner.

Typical copy/paste reply when faced with the cold, hard facts (that you requested).

Exactly, and people are noticing. Question ; What is your policy on transport? Harris ; Well let me start by saying that my father bought me my first bicycle when I was 7. It had 2 wheels, and pedals, and blah blah blah. It's laughable at this point. And it will only become more obvious in the final 4 weeks as the pressure ramps up. Put a fork in her, she's done.

Even The Guardian have turned on him. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/08/keir-starmer-unforced-error-machine-squandered-electoral-capital Tick tock for 2 tier, free gear Keir.

It's evidence. There were loads of US prisoners that could have been exchanged but they didn't fit the profile, so they were ignored. That you choose to ignore it is no surprise.

Mis-spoke? Just like Walz I guess. What a "knucklehead". But no, I have plenty more. Turns out the free Swift tickets were in exchange for a VVIP police escort. What a clown show. https://surgeradio.cl/opiniones/how-top-labour-politicians-pressed-police-to-give-taylor-swift-vvip-protection-that-prince-harry-cant-get-and-enjoyed-free-concert-tickets/135944/

Not just her race. Also her celebrity status. Here's a list of other US prisoners ignored by the Dems as they went for the high profile release of Briner. It's all the evidence you need. https://apnews.com/article/russia-putin-us-prisoners-spying-gershkovich-9d8260f09233d2385856b85d26d3954b

See. I only had to mention race baiting and here you are. Like a fly to sxxx 😃 Her race was always a massive part of the story. Here is one example, in case you forgot again. So yes, it is part of the story and worthy of mention even if you'd prefer it was brushed under the table. https://www.msnbc.com/know-your-value/out-of-office/brittney-griner-s-peril-black-women-america-n1296905

He's been caught lying about his families military service now. What is it with these Liberals and lies. They can't help themselves. https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1959777/keir-Starmer-Falklands-war-uncle-torpedoed-claims

Thought you were being serious for a moment, you never know with some of the race baiters on here 😄.

Come on Dick, even you can do better than that.

Good to see Harris facing all the tough, serious journalists 😃.

Yep, that's the main thing. Let's not worry about all those killed by Houthi militants using weapons bought from Bout. As long as Brittney doesn't have to suffer any consequences.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-67085625

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3767108-why-the-us-was-able-to-bring-home-brittney-griner-but-not-paul-whelan/

More justification of violence against those with whom you disagree. But at least you are being honest for once.

I wouldn't be at all surprised for Victoria to change that signal for refs in the next few months, just in case it offends anyone. Maybe they could use this instead.

So why Briner and not "some other American"? There were plenty of other Americans who had been imprisoned far longer that were worthy of attention. She got special treatment due to her immutable characteristics, her fame and how the Biden administration perceived helping her to be "good optics". I believe your ilk refer to special treatment for certain demographics as "positive discrimination" and "equity". I'll ignore the petty Brit bashing. Beneath me.

In other words, it was "only" 97 women raped, and who cares if they were immigrants as long as they have the correct paperwork. Shocking stuff.

Spoken like a true "Liberal". Violence for all those who disagree with the prescribed view. 😃 PS don't try your strawman "you must be a Nazi as well" nonsense on me. To answer your next post, I will state clearly that I disagree with people with pro Nazi views, but I also defend their right to have them. And I defend their right to put their own right arm wherever they like, as long it does not physically harm anyone else.

Of course. Leftists always wish to silence those with whom they disagree. It's leftism 101. Why would you be any different? Neither do I. I defend freedom of speech.

Exactly like that Chomps, and you know it. He has my sympathy for having his freedom of speech restricted. Unlike you, I will defend peoples freedom of speech even if I disagree with what they are saying.