JonnyF

I guess Britain doesn't need to be a global charity any more. All the "Asylum Seekers" are already here, so we can just be a domestic charity. Same Same.

Freaky Deaky. Diddy do it? Sure looks that way. But if OJ can get off, so can Combs.

Stop gaslighting.

Good news if true. However, if Labour told me it was raining in Manchester in October I'd go outside to check. They say a lot of things but actually do very few of them.

Yep, it would have been absolutely astounding if he DIDN'T have a trans kid. Megan Fox has got 3. 😄 It's like a competition.

If Carlsberg did Presidents... Trump is unstoppabale.

Agree. The FA is as Woke as they come. Remember all the "taking a knee" for BLM under Southgate while all other political posturing was banned? The rainbow laces? The only reason that loser Southgate was kept in the job was because he's another virtue signalling lefty Lineker wannabee who had no backbone to stand up to them. A "Yes" man. The FA needs to focus on winning something, something England hasn't done for almost 6 decades, not on proving their Woke credentials. They are an embarrassment.

There are many listed in the OP. The proportion of celebs with trans children is far greater than the general population. This is also an interesting read. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-latest-celebrity-must-have-a-trans-child/

There must be enormous pressure on the children of celebrities to come out as trans. Every lefty celeb wants a trans kid, it highlights their Woke credentials. Look how many have them, it's uncanny. There must be lots of difficult conversations around Hollywood right now. "Mum, Dad, I'm so sorry to disappoint you, but I'm straight and I feel I was born into the right body". 😄

That's because Thais are smarter than Western Liberals, and haven't been infected with the Woke mind virus. I've seen some Ladyboy kickboxers fighting blokes in Thailand. They're very skilled, and vicious, they put up a great fight. And why wouldn't they? They are biologically male. Put one of them in with a woman of the same weight and the woman would be in danger of very serious injury. Only a Western Lib would be dumb enough to consider such a thing.

Wasn't much of a challenge Ray. You asked for a number, I gave you it in my reply... It seems your attempt to "challenge me" fell pretty flat. 😄

Very loud. Nearly spilled my beer.

I wonder why they would cover for this woman, Kuldeep Stohr?

Well Ray, when the bath is overflowing with water I believe it's prudent to turn off the tap before trying to make the sides higher. Obviously it's difficult to put a specific number on it (which is precisely why you asked the question) but I will humour your attempts to be "clever". Given the ridiculously high numbers over the last decade and the social issues that has caused in terms of housing, crime, the NHS, education, increased taxes etc. I (personally) would set an absolute maximum of 4,999 per year. But every single one would need to be thoroughly verified as a genuine asylum seeker, with a clean criminal record who is in real danger if we send him back to his home country. With those checks in place, you'd probably end up with less than 1,000 genuine cases, all of which I would be happy to help.

I have seen no evidence of any veteran. All I have seen is an unnamed source whose alleged words were read by a voice over actor on a TV show. Who/Where is this veteran you speak of?

But we don't know if UK soldiers said it. They are "unnamed sources" played by voice-over actors on a TV program.

Right wingers like Douglas Murray? Your attempts to conflate being right wing with being homophobic are not only inane, but futile. Maybe time to do less writing, and more reading? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_conservatism

Well done Cerys for standing up for women's rights. You have a right to play against other women on a level playing field without being injured by a man with pigtails. We need more brave young women like this, and less plastic feminists who roll over to support men in women's changing rooms because it happens to be the latest fad.

Exactly. Many soldiers come back mentally damaged or hold a grudge against the armed forces for whetever reason. The idea that it must be true because it allegedly came from an unnamed "former soldier" is ridiculous. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the unnamed source turned out to have links to The Taliban and was paid by The BBC for the interview, not unlike the kid in that bleeding heart Gaza documentary (who had family links to Hamas) that they ended up having to apologize for - again.

Maybe you should relax your grip on those pearls until there is?

You mean there is no trial scheduled based on these allegations by unnamed sources?

When is the trial?

Nonsense. Allegations by unnamed sources. Excuse me if I don't cry myself to sleep about something that most likely never happened. If proven true in a court of law, let's discuss again - once we know all the facts. Until then, I will leave the pearl clutching to the experts, you and Chomps.

Not one of the sources has been named. So we have vague allegations by unnamed sources. Excuse me if I don't hang the SAS out to dry. 😄 The story is here to be discussed. I do not find it credible. Others may. But running to the teacher to try and get me banned because I do not believe the allegations seems a little silly Chomps.

Alleged actions. Nothing has been proved. It's just a story. Even if partially true (highly unlikely), they wouldn't come close to what The Taliban has done. Don't see you criticizing them though. Keep bashing Britain and it's armed forces though..