What are you talking about Chomhpherh?
Do you not know the difference between canceling/deplatforming someone and suing them for libel? They are 2 completely different things.
But you already knew that...
Not worth your time and yet you wrote a whole paragraph on it.????
You can't answer without conceding I am correct. Maybe best you just stop drawing attention to that fact...
So if he creates his own version of YouTube and posts a video, that is proof that he hasn't been cancelled? ????????
You're on top form today Chohmpherh. Good stuff ????
Is that the best you've got? ???? I wasn't looking for a quote from one of your fridge magnets.
You won't answer because you know I am correct. Answering truthfully would highlight that. The BBC, Channel 4 and YouTube are cancelling him. They are all left leaning.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/evangerstmann/2021/03/22/what-is-cancel-culture/?sh=18e7a4c9bd55
Possibly, but that's not how I read it.
When a girl inists I wear a condom I'm thinking sex is on the cards. As would most men.
Here's a crazy idea. Maybe a trial would be helpful to establish what happened before we ruin his life by canceling his life's work?
No to what? To sex without a condom?
When a girl insists on a condom, it suggests she is consenting to sex. Or was she insisting on a condom before they started doing the laundry?
Sounds like an argument over a condom. Like she asked him to wear one and he refused, or maybe secretly took it off during the act.
This is why it's a good idea to have a trial in a court, rather than by social media.
Let's add the BBC and Channel 4 to YouTube.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12535315/Russell-Brand-removed-BBC-iPlayer-sex-assault-claims.html
Funny how the cancellers are always left leaning.
Nonsense.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/01/13/reaching-net-zero-would-cost-taxpayers-twice-much-no-10s-estimates/
Support? How does one support a policy without voting for them? Are you implying I stand outside Number 10 Waving a Tory scarf and chanting "There's only one Rishi Sunak"?
Wait until they see how much it's going to cost them. You think Sunak is rolling back on this because he thinks it's a vote loser?
https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/public-support-majority-net-zero-policies-unless-there-is-a-personal-cost
PS I don't vote Tory, but nice Strawman. Bravo.
He's certainly not wasting any time trying to extract every last Baht from the population.
I'm guessing he had a bit of a shock when he was allowed to have a look at the books and saw how much has been stolen from the country since 2014. Now he's in a panic trying to make sure the place doesn't go down the pan. After 9 years with the snouts in the trough, the carcass has been stripped to the bone and tax payers are going to be fleeced to pay for it.
An excellent article on the absurdity of Big Tech deplatforming him.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/09/19/big-tech-must-not-be-judge-jury-and-executioner/
This will form part of his next manifesto. At least I hope it does, because it will be very popular with the electorate who are sick of the green agenda and being forced to accept a lower standard of living at a higher cost to appease the doomsday cult of climate alarmism.
They voted for the Conservative party Chomhpherh. We don't vote for "the president" in Britain. You're not in Kansas anymore.
Heat pumps are extremely ineffecient at very low temperates typical of a British winter. Plus they cost thousands to install.
Same as EV's reduce petrol bills. As long as you have 20 grand to buy one. OK for you sat in your ivory tower preaching about the cult of climate alarmism, many people don't have that kind of money to waste on the folly of net zero.
Good job Rishi.
Of course not.
The issue is having your ability to support yourself and your family removed before you've even BEEN investigated.
But you already knew that...