Jump to content

JonnyF

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    17,012
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by JonnyF

  1. Don't worry, your gammon defense should hold up ????.
  2. Links to the evidence please.
  3. Oh dear. Someone has upset Antifa. Let the cancellation begin. ???? #believeallwomen
  4. Why? Because the left love a bit of cancel culture when it takes out someone they disagree with. I would have thought that was obvious ????. You glee is seeping through your posts. I think I'm going to have to wipe my screen down.
  5. You think he's guilty huh? Like Spacey was? Oh wait a minute...
  6. I see. Cancellation has begun and he hasn't even had a chance to defend himself yet. You must be delighted.
  7. Nothing will come of this. It will be a case of "he said she said" since I believe in these cases Brand was in a relationship with the women so any physical evidence that remains after a decade or two can be explained away as consensual. It will certainly keep him busy though. And maybe he will re-consider whether he wishes to keep unearthing the issues he has been unearthing. Isn't that the whole point?
  8. Glad you're finally starting to get it.
  9. Yes I am starting to think this might be aimed at powerful figures who have been sending ill gotten gains overseas since 2014 and now wish to start bringing it back now their time at the trough has been limited.
  10. 2003. Only 20 years ago then. Presumably the alleged victim has a busy diary.
  11. The accusations against Brand stem from as long as 18 years ago. A few women have come out of the woodwork at the same time after all these years. A co-ordinated attack which he has strongly denied and stood tall, much like Dan Wooton did. I am not too sure of Brand's politics in terms of being left or right (seems like a lovey lefty to me) but I know he talks a lot about controversial issues like vaccines. I have seen absolutely no evidence to support the accusations. Edwards accusations were far more recent and as soon as they surfaced he played the mental health card, made no denial and swiftly disappeared to a mental health facility. The BBC confirmed it had seen the messages between the two. There has still been no denial fro, him and his wife basically admitted it. To me, that implies there is truth to them. I am not too sure of his politics, but as a BBC presenter I'd assume he's a lefty Remainer who pretends to be impartial but I never really looked into it. We should wait for the evidence to emerge for both, but the nature of the attack on Brand appears well co-ordinated, random and viscous whereas with Edwards it seems like a concerned relative of the alleged victim. The time it took for Brand's victims to come forward (all at the same time) is also HIGHLY suspicious to me. Seems like a way to stain his character and shut him up as he has clearly gone after some powerful entities. Nobody needs to shut up Edwards, because he is basically a puppet who reads from a teleprompter provided by his mainstream, establishment masters in exchange for cash extorted from the general public. Hope that clears things up.
  12. I don't agree with everything he says, but I'd say he's right about 90% of the time. A very intelligent individual. I loved the way he owned Cathy Newman here.. Hilarious. Seriously - watch it.
  13. "Liberal" Americans hate Britain. They loved seeing the EU lording over us. They can't stand the fact we ditched the technocrats, became independent again and are doing fine without them. It boils their blood. ????
  14. Of course not.???? The CPTPP is essentially a trade agreement, not a corrupt federalist project. Had the EU not massively over-reached politically and instead remained a common market we'd still be in it.
  15. A great example of EU hypocrisy.
  16. Every country that sells to the EU follows their standards. We have to follow China's standards when we sell to China. Doesn't mean I want to be ruled by Xi.
  17. The UK bans more than a few carcinogens and poisons from food. They now decide for themselves instead of being dictated to by EU technocrats.
  18. The EU allows carcinogens in food. Every country decides which carcinogens they allow and which ones they ban. Well, except EU countries of course.
  19. Germany is not relevant during a Brexit topic? You do realize Germany is the largest EU economy? You do realize Brexit has hugely impacted German exports to the UK?
  20. All countries have carcinogens in their food. Including EU countries. It's an inane point. Barely worthy of a response.
  21. By higher standards, you mean they ban more things? Yes, of course that is the raison d'etre of the EU. Ban, regulate, restrict. It's how they justify their existence. A corrupt, protectionist racket. Thank god we left.
  22. Just as the US does.
  23. Same as they have to follow our rules and regulations when they sell to UK businesses. That's how trade works. Unfortunately for them, German exports to the UK have plummeted since Brexit. One of the factors leading Germany to enter recession. https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/gloomy-ifo-fuels-fears-second-german-recession-year-2023-08-25/ Lucky for the EU that the German economy is not vital to the financial health of the bloc. Oh, wait a minute...
  24. Oh, so that's why Labour haven't won an election since 2005 ????. I'll stick to general elections and referendums to see what the British voters want. You can keep relying on people with clipboards getting minimum wage to ask 500 people what they think on a rainy afternoon outside Tesco. Opinion polls... ????
  25. We had very little influence in the Franco/German led EU when we were in it. Now we have left, we follow the rules we wish to follow. Since we voted in a Democratic referendum to leave the EU, the British do what we want (despite Remainer anti-Democratic attempts to deny the will of the people).
×
×
  • Create New...