billd766

And possibly be far more expensive IMO as well.

Talking of armchair warriors thousand of miles away, have you put yourself into he conflict yet?

send the scammers to the very front line and use them as mk1 mine detectors, unarmed of course.

But not surprising from him. Yes you are blaming her as you blame most victims especially young girls who have been raped and have babies. I have seen d more empathy from a rock. The next thing is that you are misunderstood, and didn't really mean it to come out that way. What case is that? You have no case. Yes it is. Nobody else on this thread agrees with you.

Never say never.

Nothing is inevitable in politics, especially things that are years into the future. Several quotes for you. A week is a long time in politics. Harold Wilson https://oupacademic.tumblr.com/post/66321507640/misquotation-a-week-is-a-long-time-in The Liberal politician Joseph Chamberlain is recorded in 1886 as having said: ‘In politics, there is no use in looking beyond the next fortnight.’ Both were correct.

IMHO, Trump truly believes in his own words.

IF the EU 'generously' allows the UK back the BBC News website commented A put down https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66872827 Mr Starmer's European trip coincided on Tuesday with the publication, commissioned by the French and the German governments, of a think tank paper on EU reform. It included mention of the UK as a possible future "associate member", making financial contributions in exchange for a closer economic relationship. BANG! Suddenly MPs were arguing once again about whether Brexit was the right or wrong choice for Britain and what the EU associate membership "offer" from the EU meant. Newspaper headlines sounded the alarm. One proclaimed a Franco-German "plot", while another suggested it was Brussels' attempt to entice the Labour Party to get closer to the EU again. "To think this paper is in any way connected with Keir Starmer's visit or even King Charles' visit to France is fanciful," one high-level diplomat told me. "Nothing to do with reality. We're having a completely different conversation." "It's deja vu - like the old days of Brexit negotiations," said another. "UK politicians are talking to themselves, ignoring what we're actually saying in the EU."

Who says that the UK will Change back? All that has changed is that the labour party has said some words, Michael Heseltine, who at 90 years old is a member of the house of lords and may not even be alive when any referendum votes are taken, has said some words, the EU, Germany and France have said some words. None of them even bothered to mention the fact that there has to be another referendum and the results of that will be decided by the British voters. It is all simply pie in the sky until the next UK general election results come in and may or may not change depending on that. Keir Starmer is only saying what he hopes will happen, IF labour wins the next UK election. Michael Heseltine is irrelevant anyway and the EU, France and Germany have their hands full holding the EU together as more countries want to join an unequal cabal.

So do I.

Not at all. A better punishment would be to beat him with a piece of 4 x 2 with long, blunt rusty nails, until he collapses and then let him recover without medication. Repeat over a year or 2 at odd intervals day or night then sometimes drag him in and do nothing. Perhaps 3 or 4 times in a single night. Terrorise the slimy piece of <deleted by me> ...t, just to give him the same sort of helpless feeling that the innocent children had. To make it worse for both him and his latest 'wife', make her do the punishment. IMHO no punishment is good (or bad) enough for slime like that.

Whilst that may well be true of chemical castration, it is certainly not true of physical castration. Especially if a blunt, rusty, broken hacksaw blade is used.

This is the best i could come up with. https://www.google.com/search?q=Doxes&rlz=1C1CHBF_enTH1026TH1026&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 "hackers and online vigilantes routinely dox both public and private figures" Alternatively "early 21st century: alteration of docs, plural of doc1 (short for document)", or "to publicly identify or publish private information about (someone) especially as a form of punishment or revenge". https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dox#:~:text=transitive verb,or otherwise targeted for harassment … "Doxxing is a form of online harassment that means publicly exposing someone's real name, address, job, or other identifying info without a victim's consent. The aim of doxxing is to humiliate, bully, harass, or otherwise harm a victim".

Ib used to fly a glider in Singapore in the late 1960's and early 1970's but gave it up when I came back to the UK. I was never very good at it anyway.

But if you turn the device off, what use is it then? If it can disable IFF interrogation replies, then it has already shown up on a radar set somewhere.

Then what is the use for the device? If it is so easy, even for first year electronics students, then why is there no sign of such a device? It would have immense use it the aviation industry. Just think how many would be needed for every medium and long range commercial aircraft would have to be fitted and retrofitted with one. Every large military aircraft and helicopters would have to be fitted and retrofitted in every major countries armed forces. That in itself would be a major gain for the defence and avionics industries world wide. I wonder why it hasn't been thought about or invented, even by first year electronics students yet? Perhaps it has, and it is a highly kept top secret device and of course, as you say it will be as cheap as chips. Have you any ideas?

And have they been tested on a stealth aircraft? Any tracking device transmits all the time it is switched on. Commercial tracking devices use a known frequency band and a different specific code is used to identify each device so that multiple devices can be used per frequency. A computer scanning device can scan every frequency looking for a tracking device and then lock on to it. We used to use something similar in New Zealand back in 2008, some 15 years ago. What is probably needed is a passive tracking device that is only activated when it is called, and even then it can be tracked. It also needs to have a separate internal power supply that works for at least 6 weeks, to work underwater, be built into a crashproof container that can survive a 20G crash and still work 24/7 for at least 6 weeks. IF there are any items like that, they are unlikely to be commercially available, and certainly won't be cheap. If it transmits it uses a radio frequency. If it uses a frequency it can be tracked. If it can be tracked, why would you fit it to an aircraft the has been designed to be stealthy?

KBank at 14:47 today. here are 2 for you. TRAVELLERS' CHEQUES EXPORT SIGHT BILL TELEX TRANSFER BANK NOTES TT&DRAFT T/CHEQUES BANK NOTES USD 1 USD : 1 35.89 35.89 35.99 34.98919 36.29 36.42656 USD 5-20 USD : 5-20 35.89 35.89 35.99 35.19661 36.29 36.42656 USD 50-100 USD : 50-100 35.89 35.89 35.99 35.71516 36.29 36.46113 Bangkok Bank at 14:49 today Currency Description Bank Notes Buying Rates Bank Notes Selling Rates Sight Bill Buying Rates TT Buying Rates Bill - DD - TT Selling Rates USD1 USD: 1-2 34.84 36.39 USD5 USD: 5-20 35.19 36.39 USD50 USD: 50-100 35.66 36.39 35.89 35.99 36.29

So you are claiming that Thaksin set up the election on his own, made sure that the MFP would win, and then lose, that he arranged for ALL the generals to throw the election badly, that he convinced ALL the political parties, even those that hate him far more than any farang could, arranged for the only person who could could commute his prison sentence and grant him a pardon, just so that he could return and run Thailand? I don't believe he has that much money or power, not when the politicians' in Thailand and the police/military can make sure that he has an "accident" at any time since 2006. If you believe that then you need a whole stack of tinfoil conspiracy hats to wear. Do you have any idea how many ordinary people, let alone police, military, civil servants etc would be needed, not to mention the press,msm and social media let alone from the person at the very top? And all of this without a single leak from anybody of any kind at any time?

It is also one of the truest things you may have read. How many military people have EVER been punished for making/supporting any military coup going back to 1932? They don't even get a slap on the wrist, pay a 500 baht fine, or give a wai. They steal the entire country from the Thai people, loot it AND grant themselves an amnesty.

Would you be happy for anybody at all to release all the details of your medical treatment to all and sundry, because THEY don't believe you? It is nobody else's business, especially that of a gaggle of mouth flappers such can be found here.

Thank you for trying to bring some common sense into the post. Sadly it will fail, as all the doctors and surgeons on ANN/TVF are self taught and can diagnose patients with a few clicks on their keyboard, without the need to even see the patient or even know the patient's history. Yhr problem is that as you grow older your medical problems increase. There are few people in their 70's and older who are perfectly fit.

I didn't really want to down that Nancy Mace road.

From the BBC World news site. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66850422 quote "The request led to mockery online and criticism from lawmakers. Nancy Mace, a Republican congresswoman for South Carolina, asked on X, formerly Twitter: "How in the hell do you lose an F-35? "How is there not a tracking device and we're asking the public to what, find a jet and turn it in?" The aircraft is a stealth jet - meaning its airframe, sensors and systems are designed to operate undetected by enemy radar. My question is a simple one. Why would you put a tracking device on an aircraft which has been designed to be stealth? It is supposed to operate undetected by enemy radar.. If you put a tracking device on it that is continuously transmitting, then it becomes stealthy no longer. With modern technology, it would not take long to scan all the frequencies and find the tracking transmitter which renders the aircraft stealthy no longer, and in fact would make it easier to track and shoot down.

Just another days lies from the liar in chief. No change there.