thaibeachlovers

Apparently you are easily scared.

I don't know how long you have been on here, but I've been on it a long time and with a short lived exception it has always had a world news subforum.

and perhaps people that resort to insults instead of posting something intelligent are just exposing themselves as being an <deleted><deleted>.

LOL. Quite a few posters on here that only have dumb childish personal attacks. I have a lot of them on ignore.

IMO Trump would do well to ignore the cackling Harris, and carry on with his rallies. It'll be good to compare the size of his as against hers. He has zero to gain from debating her and if it annoys her that's all to the good.

All of which makes no difference to his eligibility to become POTUS. If one wants to talk about criminality, IMO putting Biden up as capable of being POTUS again was fraud, and his minders should be prosecuted for it. At the very least it was false advertising.

Lets pick that apart and analyse it He is scared of Harris. No doubt. He hates smart and accomplished women. You have no proof of that. But he will pretend otherwise. He is the great pretender. In your opinion And he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed. and yet he was able to be elected POTUS. So for many of us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief. and yet he was able to be elected POTUS. Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever. I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. Unless you have every word Trump ever spoke on record you have no idea if that is true or not. You are just making that up. Soooo. IMO your post is a mish mash of unproven opinions and allegations masquerading as some sort of wisdom, LOL.

You have stated as a fact that my opinions are looney, therefore you are required to prove that they are, or you are lying.

No, I never look at that. Anyone posting what they claim to be a fact is required to include proof, but you know that. Says it top of page on the world news subforum

Exactly, which is why we had a POTUS that had to be told what to say for the past 3 1/2 years.

Explain. It's not a problem IMO. It's actually a good thing as he's less likely to have turned into a war monger like his opponents.

You are required to prove posted "facts". If you can't prove that it's not true.

Just as well you are not comparing yourself to a psychologist. Far as I can tell, he's basically the same person he was in 2016. At least he doesn't talk to dead people or fall over all the time, Doesn't need a teleprompter to tell him what to say either.

Explain. I do not consider him to witty, intelligent, analytical, or eloquent, so just what did he "fool me" on? I support him because he wasn't Clinton or Biden and he's certainly not Harris. IMO the 3 worst of the worst of US politics.

Did you support Adhern too?

Mine is for what she did to the women that accused Bill of bad things, and for abandoning US men in harm's way in Libya. Beyond the pale IMO.

The tragedy is that it didn't have to happen. Had wiser heads been in charge they might have heeded Eisenhower's warning about the military industrial complex and invested in peace instead of war.

I've never been fond of the very rich, but I made an exception for Trump as his opponents were and are so much worse, IMO.

I was about to take umbrage with your post, and then I read the second sentence. Indeed I agree with that. IMO the US loves tame dictators. They supported quite a lot of them.

and we have never had either system in reality, IMO. Socialists love the unemployable and Communism has been usurped by dictators

Taxes.

IMO the plan has always been to install a woman in the W H. Perhaps the Bene Gesserit exists in reality. That was supposed to happen with Clinton, but Trump derailed the plan which is why they hate him so much. IMO if Harris wins, it's all over for the world as we knew it, and it'll be a Brave New World our descendants live in. I'm not at all sorry to be checking out, hopefully sometime before the end of the decade.

Agree with most of that except I'd rather eat cow poo than support Haley. De Santis is my preferred alternative.

Congratulations on posting an interesting, informative and entirely relevant comment. I'll recommend you for POTY.

and what are you going to do about it, other than posting insults about Trump? The more posts I read like yours, the more I want him to win.