thaibeachlovers

Given they have not even announced officially that they will try to eliminate the investigation, perhaps we should wait and see if you or I are correct.

Your reply to my post that you quoted has absolutely nothing at all to do with my post. Deflecting much?

The problem with non medical people making non informed opinions about things like "heavy bleeding" is that they don't actually know how much is dangerous, and claims by the woman that the bottom of the bathtub was full is subjective. As I learned on a first aid course, one can lose what seems to be a lot of blood without it being a threat to life. Medical people don't willingly send people away to die, so as non of us were in the ER perhaps we can wait for the outcome of the investigation/ court case before casting stones. BTW, had she opted for the D & C likely none of the problem would have occurred.

LOL. One could substitute Democrat for GOP and it would be equally true.

If Garland has such, why has he not yet prosecuted Trump? LOL.

Most reasonable people have an issue with biased law enforcement.

One does not have to be "pro Trump" to recognise that some of his claims of persecution have merit. The "persecution" didn't stop from the time he announced his candidacy till now.

To spite the Dems enough may do so. The Dems have been saying some bad things about the GOP which may come back to bite them.

I don't envy Garland. Even IF the report says Trump is guilty it is still his responsibility to actually prosecute or not. Now that Trump has said he is running again, if Garland prosecutes the right will say it's political to prevent Trump winning, and if he doesn't, the left will criticize him for not doing so. IMO he is in a lose/ lose situation.

I have to agree with that, including the reference to being insulted. It's become especially "interesting" since 6 years ago.

POTUS don't have access to the "money". Congress ( the house ) control the money supply.

LOL. A hypothesis is just a supposition. If it were a fact it wouldn't be a hypothesis.

You are correct, and it works as a method of stopping people paying large to risk their lives on a boat hoping to jump the q to enter Australia.

Ah yes, the kids from university that know sod all about life as it really is, but claim that a piece of paper makes them experts. Yet some on this very forum have claimed that any that have not got a uni education are not as good as those that have. LOL. I'll take any that learned on the job ( with sufficient educational input from technical colleges etc ) over someone that spent 18 or so years in school anytime. Not referring to actual professionals such as doctors though. There are many reasons why Britain is struggling and IMO more to do with management as I experienced it when working there, than Brexit or any such.

Nevertheless, if the UK was as bad as some posters on this forum claim in a different thread, why would any want to risk drowning to get to Britain's shores?

To believe it was a deliberate attack by Russia on Poland one has to ask why Russia would risk war with NATO to blow up a grain silo? Whatever the truth, NATO not getting involved in a war with Russia is a good thing, IMO.

What are you on about? Did I say anything about when Trump was in power? I agree that lobbyists should be banned as should be politicians taking jobs with companies that benefited during their time in Congress.

Just like a previous POTUS. Oh, the irony!

I agree, but look what happened to the last guy that got elected on a platform of draining the swamp- got destroyed, by both sides.

I think you will find the Crown got some sort of guarantee that they could keep the goodies if they gave up total power. Why would they give up the power if they lost the lifestyle as well? As for the church- don't they own the land? Do you expect them to just give it away, or are you advocating state theft? However, I'm with you on the 10 million max, and up to me would be 2 million ( except for farmers ).

Rubbish. Not all poor people are as you claim. I'm poor because I was stupid enough to believe 2 women in my life that claimed to love me. Both times the money ( and in the first case my house and my nice car ) went to them during our time together and after they revealed themselves for what they really were. I also lost a great deal to a "friend" of 30 years that took the money ( a loan ) and ran. It's all just luck IMO. Had either of the women been what they appeared to be I'd be living a great life; same as the guys that marry a decent Thai woman.

When even rich people get scammed by "great investment opportunities" I'll pass. IMO investing is gambling for rich people.

ALL politicians, whatever gender or party they are. That includes local politicians as well, The lot of them. 3 terms sounds good to me. One as a newbie, one as someone that is beginning to know stuff, one as an opportunity to do the job the people pay them to do.

It's not a question of where I live, it's a question of how many people are using the same wi fi and as soon as too many it stops working. I used to go on it after midnight to be sure, till the gamer moved in next door and it's hit and miss now. Don't expect me to understand the technicalities, but a tv expert told me that was the problem. To be certain of getting on the internet I'd have to pay for my own private access, and I don't do enough on line to make that worthwhile. Certainly not going to pay for something I'd only use a couple of hours or so a day. The wifi is good enough for what I do, as long as I can wait. BTW, I'm not in Thailand and internet costs way more than what you are paying.

B & W tv was ok. The Avengers was great till it went colour, then they must have changed the writer or something as I didn't like it any more. Dr Who was better with Patrick Troughton when it was B & W. Many of the greatest British movies were in B & W, IMO.