nauseus

There were plenty of complaints about irregularities before, during and after the vote, especially in swing states. Vote count monitoring was one of these problems mentioned, where Republican observers were allegedly denied close access to the counting by (Democratic) poll center "officials". So bipartisan and careful monitoring was, reportedly, not always possible. Some of these complaints were heard in subsequent state senate hearings but it seems that was as far as they got. Some of those hearings were accessible on the internet at the time but it's hard to find much of anything like that anymore - just like everything else. Swamp Rules. OK?

You guys have been so quiet recently but now the bin is open. Of course it couldn't last.

This great trump witch hunt was instigated by so-called Democrats, who have had to resort to enrolling RINOS for help, because their cases are so weak otherwise.

Uh oh! And all those rate hikes too.

I got to the "bringing stability to the world order" bit and lost some coffee down my shirt. Yes, that's enough.

Lowest inflation in G7 - a comparison - is this figure so wonderful when it is still double the target according to The Fed? record low unemployment level - it is not at a record low and now starting to rise. highest GDP growth in G7 compared to pre-pandemic level - you have to compare everything to a troubled G7! record energy production and exports - only just and there is a panic on.

These 'incredible' Biden results are what? The only crack team regular I've heard of is Hunter.

Sadly, it looks like Joe's cognitive faculties left the building with Elvis.

Decoy. My dog said so.

Same old carp. Your link doesn't even support your silly claim.

That's not what I said, although they are used more and more for super soups these days.

Yes. The main issues are time and practicality. One previous story said this land bridge (not canal) would save 6-9 days but that doesn't fit. The time saved for trans-shipments (goods that do not originate or terminate in Thailand) would vary according to the geographical origin and final destination of same. Something like 5-6 days (minimum) would be required to unload and load container ships of medium size at the two ports, including loading/unloading on/off rolling stock and rail travel time. That's not even counting paperwork and customs checks. Most large ships from, say, China to India or Europe, need only about 3 days to cover the extra distance past Singapore. I can't see any economic advantage but I can see the environmental impact.

That depends on all of the ingredients being well blended.

Hard to say without having access to the report.

No, I'm not suggesting that the ESS is an EU project. But why does is the ESS needed? I've been to the site - that's where I couldn't find the poll report - useless.

I already did.

Exactly. Why does this European Social Survey even count? I can't even find the relevant report.

Neither of the above are formal statistical "classes" taught by a respected educational institution and science certainly does not 'depend' on statistics alone. But both are liable to bias (political, economic, or both) or other error. Major businesses use statistical data but, judging by some recent expensive losses, if stats have been sought and used to determine marketing strategies, there seems to be plenty of backfiring recently. Perhaps these methods are flawed?

Yes, must have. Where is it? And why should I believe it? What have expats in Thailand got to do with it?

The topic mentions "most British people" so a broad, nationwide poll is necessary, with many more than 1100 bods.

Brussels?

Not when I was there.

Not this time of year you won't. But no harm in being early. Bon voyage then.

He might bludgeon you with his hard on.

And so ended up as Bottom.