nauseus

What a patronizing, pompous pile! Grab a couple of scientific articles, cut, paste, edit and then instantly become an "educator" in earth sciences! Nope.

That's 3 in a row. What a turkey!

I see. The per capita qualifier is OK to use now.

And I think to myself What a wonderful world. Oh yeah!

There's an echo somewhere.

If that is true do you really think that's out of concern for the planet?

We all fart, even if some do not admit it. Methane is a GG which produces far more warming than CO2, So, think about the consequences next time you're about to let one rip!

Wow, that must mean I responded to an off-topic post! Forgive me....pleeeaase.

I said temporarily. Nag nag.

Self contradictory or what? Strong eruptions can temporarily reverse warming: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/1510/global-effects-of-mount-pinatubo And it's sulfur dioxide not silicon dioxide.

Not that much? What do you think drove the increase in hydrocarbon usage - therefore emissions? I was talking about the world from 1950, not individual regions. And China - low population growth? Are you kidding? Below chart from your own source - more than doubled from 1950 - 2000!

You are quite right to point out the population and resource aspects. The world population has tripled since 1950 but these extra 5.4 billion people use up more than three times the amount of resources, far more wastefully in many cases, than was possible right after the end of WWII. Real needs, plus many less vital demands, from all these extra people have prompted much more farming, which has resulted in massive land clearance and deforestation, so that (previously) large carbon sinks around the world are now much smaller. Not the whole issue but very significant.

Trump! Ha ha! You just can't help yourself, can you?

Looks like most of the interest comes from Gammagodulin.

Encore, Compte du Cuttenpaste.

Or, "I understand I'm underpowered".

You see? You're doing it again!

The bottom line is that after changing your story so often you don't realize that you're out of excuses.

Scaling is a bit better if you use the link without compressing the chart. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality

Wrong again! https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

I can - you didn't "define" anything. US Covid deaths were "high" mainly because 330 million live there. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Wrong. Per capita, the USA was 15th "hardest" hit by Covid deaths.

From that I can see that you didn't really read what I said. Never mind.

I regret to inform you that 50% does not qualify as a pass here.

I thought he was a country and western singer.